Jonathan Ericsson Watch Thread
#21
Posted 23 November 2011 - 08:54 PM
#22
Posted 23 November 2011 - 09:14 PM
- haroldsnepsts likes this
#23
Posted 24 November 2011 - 01:30 AM
Good thing he's a defenseman.Worst offensive player on the team.
Seriously, if that's your knock against Ericsson, you're scraping the bottom of the barrel for things to ***** about. I mean, he may not be Kyle Quincey, but he's not as bad as you make him out to be.
Who has ever argued that? He's got a good first pass, but he's not an offensive defenseman.Anyone who tries to argue that Ericsson has any offensive upside is wrong. Tonight is just an example of how awful his shot and instincts are. As a #6 big body who fights I don't mind him, but that kind of player isn't worth 3.25 mil.
- Hockeymom1960 and Motown4013 like this
#24
Posted 24 November 2011 - 04:18 AM
Bad news is that he is. Good news is that he is progressing, albeit significantly slower than his first stints with the Wings led most of us to expect. He was better last year than in 09-10, and better again so far this year. This year, his offensive instincts (in terms of when and how to jump in) aren't really that far behind Kronwall or White....
but he's not an offensive defenseman.
If he could fix his horrendous shot accuracy and laughably slow wind-up on his slapper he could be a 40+ point defenseman. If he can't fix those problems, he'll likely never grow into his contract because he's never shown any signs that his positioning, shot blocking, anticipation, physicality, or reaction time are (or could be) any better than 3rd-pair level.
#25
Posted 24 November 2011 - 01:20 PM
According to who?Bad news is that he is. Good news is that he is progressing, albeit significantly slower than his first stints with the Wings led most of us to expect. He was better last year than in 09-10, and better again so far this year. This year, his offensive instincts (in terms of when and how to jump in) aren't really that far behind Kronwall or White.
If he could fix his horrendous shot accuracy and laughably slow wind-up on his slapper he could be a 40+ point defenseman. If he can't fix those problems, he'll likely never grow into his contract because he's never shown any signs that his positioning, shot blocking, anticipation, physicality, or reaction time are (or could be) any better than 3rd-pair level.
Ericsson has never scored 40 points in his career, let alone doing it in the NHL. He's a converted forward, but I've not heard or seen any real expectations of him to be an offensive producer for the Wings. His potential is to be a big physical puck moving defenseman who can kill penalties and clear the crease. Ideally sort of like Stuart but with a better first pass.
Edited by haroldsnepsts, 24 November 2011 - 01:21 PM.
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
#26
Posted 24 November 2011 - 02:25 PM
#27
Posted 24 November 2011 - 03:23 PM
Acoording to the way he plays the game. Just because he isn't very good at it doesn't mean that's not what he is. (Well, two-way defenseman would be more accurate, but his play definitely leans more toward offense.) Likewise, just because he's big and we all want him to be a Stuart-type doesn't mean that's what he is.According to who?
Ericsson has never scored 40 points in his career, let alone doing it in the NHL. He's a converted forward, but I've not heard or seen any real expectations of him to be an offensive producer for the Wings. His potential is to be a big physical puck moving defenseman who can kill penalties and clear the crease. Ideally sort of like Stuart but with a better first pass.
He probably should be, and getting him to change his style would probably be easier than fixing his shooting issues. That's just not how he plays right now.
#28
Posted 24 November 2011 - 05:27 PM
I don't follow.Acoording to the way he plays the game. Just because he isn't very good at it doesn't mean that's not what he is. (Well, two-way defenseman would be more accurate, but his play definitely leans more toward offense.) Likewise, just because he's big and we all want him to be a Stuart-type doesn't mean that's what he is.
He probably should be, and getting him to change his style would probably be easier than fixing his shooting issues. That's just not how he plays right now.
He's got some pretty good passing skills, but no shot to speak of really. Doesn't pinch much. Plays more of a stay at home style. Gets zero time on the power play but is 3rd on the team in PK TOI. What about the way he plays the game makes him an offensive defenseman? The only thing that really fits is his first pass.
To me a guy like Lebda fits that description much more than Ericsson. Lebda had good speed, decent puckhandling and would jump into the play and rush the puck up ice, usually only to panic and turn it over. He was an offensive defenseman who wasn't very good at it, and had weak defensive skills.
I agree his slapshot is awful. It's something he could and should be working on, but has had zero improvement. Other than now at least he seems to realize how long it takes to get his slapshot off, so he takes it less.He's got a decent pass and a hard slapshot. He's just horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE at using it. The average defensive defenseman can wind up a slapshot and have it hit somewhere near the net. Ericsson can't.
Edited by haroldsnepsts, 24 November 2011 - 05:25 PM.
#29
Posted 24 November 2011 - 10:14 PM
#30
Posted 26 November 2011 - 01:41 PM
- haroldsnepsts, Hockeymom1960, P. Marlowe and 3 others like this
#31
Posted 26 November 2011 - 07:47 PM
He doesn't really make use of his size, and he always looks like he's completely discombobulated.
I agree. It's like a boy going through puberty that grew 8 inches over the summer, and when he comes back to school he barely knows how to walk.
Ericsson doesn't use his size at all.
Although, I will give him credit, he's the only guy on the team willing to drop the gloves for his team.
#32
Posted 26 November 2011 - 11:05 PM
I think he has been solid. Everytime I look at Wisneiwski, who everone wanted here, I an F$#$#@! happy that we signed E!Am I the only one who thinks E hasn't been that bad? Sure he still makes some boneheaded plays but it looks like he is playing a much safer game out there and not taking as many risks. He is also stepping up the physical game as i've seen him step up for some big hits and has had a couple good ones recently. All he needs to do now is not stand around with his **** in his hand in front of the net and clear the crease better.
- P. Marlowe likes this
Money on the board-SCP 2013
I'm going with the 22 special. 2 bucks for every 22 goal. 2 bucks for every 22 fight
5 bucks for every series win....another 5 for every shut out! LETS GO RED WINGS!!
ADDENDUM: Since it looks like Toots may not reinserted in the series, I would like to offer Bert his money on the board. So, 2 bucks for every Bert fight, 2 bucks for every Bert goal AND since OT has been a pattern, I want to add 5 bucks for any RED WINGS OT winner. LET'S GO RED WINGS!!!!
#33
Posted 27 November 2011 - 12:16 AM
#34
Posted 27 November 2011 - 03:43 AM
Although, I will give him credit, he's the only guy on the team willing to drop the gloves for his team.
Abdelkader?
#35
Posted 27 November 2011 - 04:34 AM
I figured we'd see Abdelkader tilt with Tootoo tonight, especially when he started going after Stuart, of all people.Abdelkader?
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#36
Posted 27 November 2011 - 08:13 AM
Kindl? (note, they didn't say fight wellAbdelkader?
Ken Holland: He’s (Mursak) a young guy, provides energy, can skate, he’s a puck hound.
#37
Posted 27 November 2011 - 08:22 AM
I figured we'd see Abdelkader tilt with Tootoo tonight, especially when he started going after Stuart, of all people.
that would be a disaster.
#38
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:39 AM
They would also know, however, that a player's positioning, tactics, and ultimate playing style (as in what they do with the puck/their body, not necessarily the way they carry themselves), has an awful lot to do with doing what their coach tells them or risk getting benched for not listening. E has been pretty solid and has obviously warrented his place in the line-up according to the staff as he's not too big a 'star' to be sitting in the press box. If he was playing that bad, or was constantly out of position, he would be seeing less time. I think he's actually doing what he's told, rather than taking his initiative that may not as of yet have enough experience to be effective. Once he learns solid play by doing as he's told, it'll come more naturally. I'm ok with that.
If anyone knows hockey and actually watches Ericsson they would notice that he never is in position. His awareness is terrible. People can be parked in front of the net and you would think he doesn't know they exist. The biggest problem is how much he is being paid to do what he does. He doesn't contribute anything offensively and is mediocre at best defensively. I wouldn't have a problem if he was getting paid in the 1-2 mil range, but he is getting paid too much money to not contribute offensively. I think when we get to the trade deadline we should consider packaging him instead of Kindl in a trade. Kindl is cheaper and has been much more solid.
- haroldsnepsts likes this

Check out my blog -The Heid-Out- a cynical mans take on everyday life
#39
Posted 27 November 2011 - 09:14 PM
#40
Posted 01 December 2011 - 08:40 AM
He did take a penalty last night that Tampa converted on, but I was at the game so I couldn't tell if the penalty was BS or not.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official 2013 MLB Thread |
Other Sports | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
Do Maple Leaf fans deserve better?
or are you content to watch them suffer? |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
General Playoff Thread |
General Discussion | wingsfan4795 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














