Rick Nash "available for the right team/price"
#121
Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:33 PM
#122
Posted 15 February 2012 - 12:59 PM
Honestly it's not much better than a lot of the trades offered up here.I love HFboards when trades like this come up. My favorite offer so far
To Philadelphia
Rick Nash
To Columbus
Michael Leighton
Andreas Lilja
Jody Shelley
5rd round pick.
Lol
As fans we're not really wanting to part with key players, so many of the suggestions aren't really based on a realistic trade value as they are a list of players we're willing to part with.
Which is why Hudler, Kindl, Ericsson and a couple lesser prospects often end up on the list. Nevermind that Ericsson has a NMC. Some people apparently think he'd be willing to forgo that to play in a historic powerhouse franchise like Columbus.
#123
Posted 15 February 2012 - 02:58 PM
Money on the board: $40
Thanks for a great season, guys. You exceeded expectations and have given us something to look forward to as the long summer approaches.
And next year we get to start in October, like hockey is SUPPOSED to.
#124
Posted 15 February 2012 - 03:19 PM
I forgot who posted it but someone Saying bout giving up a star which I disagree about.... I don't see stars getting swapped much. Besides Heatley for Havlat.... Look at the bigger names. Kovalchuk, Richards, Carter, thornton heck even Burns it's usually up and comers plus prospects picks.... Especially from a team that's in the "Fail for Nail" process
Side note.... I would never do it for loyalty reason but... Id be willing to move Z for Nash and let Filppula have second line center lol.... But I love Z too much but he is slowly decreasing in production...
#125
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:34 PM
Even ignoring loyalty, I'd never do that. Nash has surpassed the point-per-game mark ONCE in the NHL with 79 points in 78 games in 08-09.Side note.... I would never do it for loyalty reason but... Id be willing to move Z for Nash and let Filppula have second line center lol.... But I love Z too much but he is slowly decreasing in production...
Zetterberg (who's considered to be having a terrible year): 44 points in 58 games - 0.759 points/game
Nash: 39 points in 57 games - 0.684 points/game
Admittedly, Nash hasn't exactly had amazing players in Columbus, but he's not quite the offensive juggernaut that he's sometimes made out to be. In Detroit he'd play with better players for sure, but he would no longer be the go-to guy in all offensive situations...there are several factors. Even playing with Datsyuk, my guess is he'd never pass much more than 80 point seasons.
Add to this that Zetterberg is better defensively and a playoff beast, whereas Nash is a fairly unknown commodity come playoff time (3 pts and minus 4 in 4 playoff games) and I'd take Z in a heartbeat.
Also, great play for Team Canada is not the same as playing on the Wings/in the NHL.
Edited by Zetts, 15 February 2012 - 05:35 PM.
#126
Posted 15 February 2012 - 05:51 PM
sucks real bad that Detroit isnt on his short list...but i do understand him perhaps not wanting to entirely screw his would-be former team by going to a Cup contender within the division.
I have been paying attention to this situation... I haven't heard any official list. Where is there a reputable source?
- ace76 likes this
Tootoo does NOT belong on this team. He is classless and I would rather see the Wings be bad than classless. I feel the same way about Bertuzzi as well, but he at least CAN make the team better. With Tootoo the team becomes worse and in danger of being classless. Would you have liked Claude on the team? Or Roy? No. So why would you be okay with that POS.
This thread has been closed due to emotions being higher than people's ability to read, interpret, and properly respond to simple posts.
#127
Posted 15 February 2012 - 08:37 PM
We can say "please" Kenny do it.
Jokes on the side that would be great to have him as a Red Wing. We have seen Kenny making unexpected moves. Let's hope this one would be too.
Go Wings !
#128
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:06 PM
esteef
#129
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:27 PM
Nash is Lazy and He Sucks.
esteef
Can't blame Nash for being lazy. It is the team he is playing for. Put anybody in his position and they will loose interest in playing competitive Hockey instantly. Need motivation. Red Wings is as good as it gets for being motivated and being competitive.
Try that !
#130
Posted 15 February 2012 - 09:33 PM
Datsyukian
Dat·syu·ki·an [dat-soo-kee-uh n]
adjective
1. When your moves are so amazing and beyond reason, the only way to describe them is "datsyukian."
#131
Posted 16 February 2012 - 05:13 AM
Can't blame Nash for being lazy. It is the team he is playing for. Put anybody in his position and they will loose interest in playing competitive Hockey instantly. Need motivation. Red Wings is as good as it gets for being motivated and being competitive.
Try that !
You can always blame a professional athlete for being lazy. It's their choice as to whether or not they give their all every night. If everyone followed your philosophy, no bad team would ever stand a chance of getting better.
- Travis and sleepwalker like this
#132
Posted 16 February 2012 - 07:28 AM
I agree that Nash and everyone should show up to work every day. However some professionals: scientist, doctors , hockey players require encouragement and or motivation.You can always blame a professional athlete for being lazy. It's their choice as to whether or not they give their all every night. If everyone followed your philosophy, no bad team would ever stand a chance of getting better.
Nash gets none in Columbus. Sometimes you have to squeeze it out of them, sometimes they need a change to get motivated. By that I don't mean bigger paycheck.
That is what I ment.
On a personal note my understanding of professionalism is far greater than you may think.
Go Wings!
Edited by arag, 16 February 2012 - 07:39 AM.
- Jasper84 and stinky fish taco like this
#133
Posted 16 February 2012 - 09:10 AM
#134
Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:19 AM
Edited by kipwinger, 16 February 2012 - 11:24 AM.
"I don't care how fast a skater you are, if you don't play this game with a big heart and a big bag of knuckles in front of the net, you don't got dinky-do."
#135
Posted 16 February 2012 - 11:45 AM
We need someone like Parise that can penetrate the box.-blueadams
#136
Posted 16 February 2012 - 02:44 PM
Sound crazy? Well Schneider is outperforming Luongo (consistently) and is a younger, cheaper player who's not signed to an enormous contract. Nash's enormous contract is more palatable if you're switching it for Luongo's bigger contract (even if the cap hit is larger for Nash).
Luongo's playoff struggles are an unnecessary distraction for the Canucks (in my opinion) considering how good Schneider's been for them over the last two years.
Right now the Canucks have a younger guy in Schneider who looks like he can be a legit #1 goaltender, so why not shed Luongo's contract and enormous baggage? Luongo, on the other hand, gets to escape the constant pressure of playing in a Canadian market with extremely high expectations and he gets to 'start over'. The Canucks probably hope Luongo can return to being a dominant postseason player like he was the year he had that epic series against Turco/Dallas, but if even if he can, how much better is that Luongo over Schneider + Nash? Both teams would be taking a risk but at least it's a star player for star player trade where the financial baggage is relatively equal (as is the talent).

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#137
Posted 16 February 2012 - 02:51 PM
luongo has a no trade clause.If I'm the Canucks I'd offer Luongo in some sort of package involving Nash.
Sound crazy? Well Schneider is outperforming Luongo (consistently) and is a younger, cheaper player who's not signed to an enormous contract. Nash's enormous contract is more palatable if you're switching it for Luongo's bigger contract (even if the cap hit is larger for Nash).
Luongo's playoff struggles are an unnecessary distraction for the Canucks (in my opinion) considering how good Schneider's been for them over the last two years.
Right now the Canucks have a younger guy in Schneider who looks like he can be a legit #1 goaltender, so why not shed Luongo's contract and enormous baggage? Luongo, on the other hand, gets to escape the constant pressure of playing in a Canadian market with extremely high expectations and he gets to 'start over'. The Canucks probably hope Luongo can return to being a dominant postseason player like he was the year he had that epic series against Turco/Dallas, but if even if he can, how much better is that Luongo over Schneider + Nash? Both teams would be taking a risk but at least it's a star player for star player trade where the financial baggage is relatively equal (as is the talent).
LOLHelm is a perennial Selke candidate
#138
Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:01 PM
Honestly it's not much better than a lot of the trades offered up here.
As fans we're not really wanting to part with key players, so many of the suggestions aren't really based on a realistic trade value as they are a list of players we're willing to part with.
Which is why Hudler, Kindl, Ericsson and a couple lesser prospects often end up on the list. Nevermind that Ericsson has a NMC. Some people apparently think he'd be willing to forgo that to play in a historic powerhouse franchise like Columbus.
A) Hudler's better than anyone on that Philly list by a huge margin.
B) No one (publicly) knows the details of Ericsson's NMC, although it's presumed to be one of those "pick x teams you refuse to be moved to" ones.
luongo has a no trade clause.
Is it an ironcald clause or one of the looser ones? NTC's haven't been too tough to work around for teams in recent years (the Campbell to Florida trade comes to mind).

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#139
Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:10 PM
the canucks can initiate a trade in the 7th year of his contract.Is it an ironcald clause or one of the looser ones? NTC's haven't been too tough to work around for teams in recent years (the Campbell to Florida trade comes to mind).
LOLHelm is a perennial Selke candidate
#140
Posted 16 February 2012 - 03:19 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Songs That Pump You Up at the Rink |
General Discussion | The Axe |
|
|
|
3 1sts for 1st Overall? |
General Discussion | Johnz96 |
|
|
|
Coyotes file for Bankruptcy/City pays 25mil to keep them
Atlanta on the move |
General Discussion | MacK_Attack |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














