• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Cajanek_Spielmacher

Realignment dropped for now

Rate this topic

41 posts in this topic

I understand that this is probably posturing leading up to the CBA but this needs to go through. http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/news?slug=ap-gmsmeetings All hockey fans need to see this nipped in the bud as soon as possible. We can not afford another bloodletting any time in the future for this sports sake. I have loved this game since 1968 and strongly feel that we can never compare financially with baseball or football. The NBA did not learn from the NHLs last lockout but I can pray that the NHL HAS learned from this past falls NBA lunacy. RANT OVER, Sorry!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screw the CBA talks. They need to be sitting down with the NHLPA and saying, "hey, we're just going to discuss the re-alignment right now. The other stuff can wait, but this has to happen so they can plan the schedule."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as I said in the other thread, if they lose a season or even half a season, Bettman needs to be canned. It would be the third time the league has lost games under his reign in less than 20 years.

And even back in 94 his big battle was about the cap. After basically breaking the union and getting a cap, they damn well better be able to work this out without a lockout. I know it's not all his fault but Bettman sets a very combative tone publicly that everyone gets their hackles up before negotiations even begin.

heikks86, edicius and sleepwalker like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is another lock out the NHL will be done as we know it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why does the PA not like the idea? From what I've heard fans and owners love it

That is probably the reason right there.

Owners love it. It gives them something to shovel into the collective anus of the league during "negotiations" this summer.

Anything that they can come up with that will hold back progress will be used to get what they want, and the guys who actually sign the paychecks and give them their contracts will have to bend over or lose another season.

Welcome to "negotiations".

Frozen-Man likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not news. Realignment was ruled out as soon at the PA voted against it in what, January? It's already a forgone conclusion realignment will not happen by next season. Assuming there is a season at all. Bettman was also on Costas a week or two ago and made it very clear that CBA negotiations have not and will not begin until the off-season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why does the PA not like the idea? From what I've heard fans and owners love it

I believe it was the travel for the teams. I can't really remember what came out when they turned it down but Nik was one of the voters and he said he agreed with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it was the travel for the teams. I can't really remember what came out when they turned it down but Nik was one of the voters and he said he agreed with it.

To me the NHL are a bunch of idiots for not involving the players union in the realignment before that. It starts things off with a very exclusionary tone.

It's like they sometimes forget who people pay to see. And that the players will be the ones doing the traveling and playing the actual games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me the NHL are a bunch of idiots for not involving the players union in the realignment before that. It starts things off with a very exclusionary tone.

It's like they sometimes forget who people pay to see. And that the players will be the ones doing the traveling and playing the actual games.

At the same time, I actually agree with what Bettman had to say about that. The PA was never previously involved in any other schedule change or realignment (according to Bettman), why should they be now? Because CBA 'negotiations' are coming up. Case in point, posturing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not news. Realignment was ruled out as soon at the PA voted against it in what, January? It's already a forgone conclusion realignment will not happen by next season. Assuming there is a season at all. Bettman was also on Costas a week or two ago and made it very clear that CBA negotiations have not and will not begin until the off-season.

I want to know why negotiations can't begin now. I don't know any of the rules for this but they don't need to publicize that they are working on it...only those that should be informed like teams, managers, players(?)if necessary.

My thinking is start talking about it now because you know they aren't going to agree on items, this way they can work on a compromise and be ready for the season to start in September!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the same time, I actually agree with what Bettman had to say about that. The PA was never previously involved in any other schedule change or realignment (according to Bettman), why should they be now? Because CBA 'negotiations' are coming up. Case in point, posturing.

I don't agree with his logic. because they hadn't been in the past that means they shouldn't now?

The league never had a salary cap before either.

I think it would've gone a long way to set a better tone had they involved the NHLPA. Instead Bettman basically came off saying "we don't even need to ask them at all." The players are the talent. The league could at least pretend to treat them with respect on occasion.

WizardOfOz30 likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get what you're saying, harold; but it would be for show only. I think the players having any real say in this is much like being an employee at *insert huge corporation name here* and having the temerity to tell the COO that they can't open a plant in New Mexico and transfer the employees there. While that would suck, and I agree workers need to be protected, but they're workers, not owners. They have no real right to tell them how to run the business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get what you're saying, harold; but it would be for show only. I think the players having any real say in this is much like being an employee at *insert huge corporation name here* and having the temerity to tell the COO that they can't open a plant in New Mexico and transfer the employees there. While that would suck, and I agree workers need to be protected, but they're workers, not owners. They have no real right to tell them how to run the business.

Honestly though I don't think that's the best analogy because we're talking about entertainment, and the players are the talent. And elite talent at that.

It's like making major changes to a very popular tv show without getting any input from the stars on it.

The Datsyuk's of the league are why people buy tickets. I think the league forgets that sometime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to know why negotiations can't begin now. I don't know any of the rules for this but they don't need to publicize that they are working on it...only those that should be informed like teams, managers, players(?)if necessary.

My thinking is start talking about it now because you know they aren't going to agree on items, this way they can work on a compromise and be ready for the season to start in September!

Oh, I agree 100%. Bettman said something along the lines of having a good season so far, why ruin that now. Makes me think he knows there is going to be a battle royal.

I don't agree with his logic. because they hadn't been in the past that means they shouldn't now?

The league never had a salary cap before either.

I think it would've gone a long way to set a better tone had they involved the NHLPA. Instead Bettman basically came off saying "we don't even need to ask them at all." The players are the talent. The league could at least pretend to treat them with respect on occasion.

True, but I think it had more to do with that they were never involved before, why would they automatically expect to be now? I agree changes do happen (e.g. salary cap) but there was is precedence that the PA was never involved before, so again, why all of a sudden? Not to mention they can't just come up with a mock schedule overnight, which is what the PA was supposedly asking for. Rumor has it they intentionally requested something that could not realistically be fulfilled pertaining to an issue they had historically never been involved with before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly though I don't think that's the best analogy because we're talking about entertainment, and the players are the talent. And elite talent at that.

It's like making major changes to a very popular tv show without getting any input from the stars on it.

The Datsyuk's of the league are why people buy tickets. I think the league forgets that sometime.

Which is why they probably should have at least made a gesture of including the NHLPA, but ultimately it's the owner's decision. The entertainment business is still a business. It's not like they're trying to move the NHL to Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I agree 100%. Bettman said something along the lines of having a good season so far, why ruin that now. Makes me think he knows there is going to be a battle royal.

True, but I think it had more to do with that they were never involved before, why would they automatically expect to be now? I agree changes do happen (e.g. salary cap) but there was is precedence that the PA was never involved before, so again, why all of a sudden? Not to mention they can't just come up with a mock schedule overnight, which is what the PA was supposedly asking for. Rumor has it they intentionally requested something that could not realistically be fulfilled pertaining to an issue they had historically never been involved with before.

That would take a long time to produce, but I also find it hard to believe the league didn't work up a mock schedule for their own purposes when debating this issue. When concocting this plan, they must've at least done a rough workup of the travel consequences and schedule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What the players seem to forget is that they are not a finite commodity. Most people don't go to a game to see *just* Datsyuk. They go to see the Red Wings as a whole. I'm sure if the owners wanted to, they could find a whole league's worth of players that maybe haven't gotten a shot at the NHL level to fill out their teams. It's got to be a give and take, and with the NBA and NFL lockouts showing, both sides overhype their importance. If everyone takes a hardline stance, which they are showing classic signs of even now, next season will be cancelled or shortened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That would take a long time to produce, but I also find it hard to believe the league didn't work up a mock schedule for their own purposes when debating this issue. When concocting this plan, they must've at least done a rough workup of the travel consequences and schedule.

Quite possibly. I think the biggest problem is this is like Democrats VS Republican, there are really no innocent parties. We the fans are citizens held hostage by the decisions and posturing both sides are willing to display and expect us to ultimately live by the outcome. In this case, the possibility of no season.

What the players seem to forget is that they are not a finite commodity. Most people don't go to a game to see *just* Datsyuk. They go to see the Red Wings as a whole. I'm sure if the owners wanted to, they could find a whole league's worth of players that maybe haven't gotten a shot at the NHL level to fill out their teams. It's got to be a give and take, and with the NBA and NFL lockouts showing, both sides overhype their importance. If everyone takes a hardline stance, which they are showing classic signs of even now, next season will be cancelled or shortened.

Ever watch the movie The Replacements?

Edited by rrasco

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I maintain that the realignment was not the best solution. I'm glad it got dropped. Lets face it, everyone would be bitching about those teams in the east making the playoffs easier as soon as western teams started missing the playoffs by a few points. Its a tight race as it is so it makes the advantage that much greater for the east. It was a garbage realignment and the NHL knows it, otherwise they'd push it through anyway.

Edited by AceInTheSleeve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anything should happen the year the Wings are to host the winter classic and presumably participate in 24/7, heads are gonna fly.

That's all I'm saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please, somebody explain what purpose this fuching (trade/labour/labor) union (PA) serves?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

please, somebody explain what purpose this fuching (trade/labour/labor) union (PA) serves?

To protect the players so they aren't individuals but instead a group. Otherwise the general managers could just do what they want without the players and their families and lives in mind.

Majsheppard likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To protect the players so they aren't individuals but instead a group. Otherwise the general managers could just do what they want without the players and their families and lives in mind.

funny...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why does the PA not like the idea? From what I've heard fans and owners love it

The owners love it because they can raise ticket prices. Any game outside our Division, or League, whatever they want to call the 4 Divisions/Leagues, can be considered an elite game, and up go the prices.

as I said in the other thread, if they lose a season or even half a season, Bettman needs to be canned. It would be the third time the league has lost games under his reign in less than 20 years.

And even back in 94 his big battle was about the cap. After basically breaking the union and getting a cap, they damn well better be able to work this out without a lockout. I know it's not all his fault but Bettman sets a very combative tone publicly that everyone gets their hackles up before negotiations even begin.

If another lockout gets Bettman canned, then bring on another lockout!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0