Hockey News sees us finishing 7th
#1
Posted 17 August 2012 - 09:28 AM
http://www.thehockey...tions-No-7.html
"Why: Welcome to the Twilight Zone. Detroit, on the playoff bubble? It feels odd to even type those words, but the Red Wings’ off-season was disastrous. They lost their best defenseman ever, Nicklas Lidstrom, to retirement, and traded Brad Stuart. The assumption was they’d land a big free agent fish or two to replace them, but GM Ken Holland swung and missed. Even if rookie Brendan Smith shines, the Wings can’t possibly replace what they’ve lost on the back end. That said, Detroit still boasts one of the league’s deepest forward corps, led by Pavel Datsyuk and Henrik Zetterberg, and newcomer Jordin Tootoo gives them sorely needed sandpaper. The Wings remain a playoff team, but aren’t a serious Cup threat anymore."
#2
Posted 17 August 2012 - 09:42 AM
Sincerely,
Optimism
- hillbillywingsfan, Dave, St. Michael (the Red Wing) and 1 other like this
#3
Posted 17 August 2012 - 09:54 AM
#4
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:07 AM
- Z Winged Dangler and Winterberg like this
#5
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:15 AM
There are no serious contenders in the league anymore. You make the playoffs, you have a 1/16 chance of winning the cup. These playoffs proved that when the Coyotes of all teams advanced to the WCF with Detroit, Vancouver and Chicago losing in first round.
- hillbillywingsfan, Z Winged Dangler, Byorski and 1 other like this

#6
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:31 AM
Wings aren't a serious cup contender?
There are no serious contenders in the league anymore. You make the playoffs, you have a 1/16 chance of winning the cup. These playoffs proved that when the Coyotes of all teams advanced to the WCF with Detroit, Vancouver and Chicago losing in first round.
Although it's true once the playoffs start I think there are still legit cup contenders. With how well NYR did last year and now adding Nash and having a healthy Marc Staal they have to be considered legit cup contenders/favorites. I'm not even the biggest Nash fan in the world but when you combine Lundqvist, their stacked D and a forward corps that should be able to score pretty well I'd say they're legit contenders.
#7
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:34 AM
The nail has been hit on the head.Wings aren't a serious cup contender?
There are no serious contenders in the league anymore. You make the playoffs, you have a 1/16 chance of winning the cup. These playoffs proved that when the Coyotes of all teams advanced to the WCF with Detroit, Vancouver and Chicago losing in first round.
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
#8
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:14 AM
Well it's a damn good thing the game is played on the ice and not decided by sport writers. The Red Wings have a new look, players will step up, everything's going to be just fine. I personally think it will be better than fine and we will surprise a lot of sport writers and fans this year. I can't wait until puck drop to see what we really have.
Sincerely,
Optimism
Agree 100%
I think the Wings are going to surprise a lot of people this year.
- LidsFan likes this
#9
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:17 AM
Would you of called L.A. a serious cup contender before last season?Although it's true once the playoffs start I think there are still legit cup contenders. With how well NYR did last year and now adding Nash and having a healthy Marc Staal they have to be considered legit cup contenders/favorites. I'm not even the biggest Nash fan in the world but when you combine Lundqvist, their stacked D and a forward corps that should be able to score pretty well I'd say they're legit contenders.
- MabusIncarnate likes this

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#10
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:30 AM
I would've called them to contend for the conference finals.Would you of called L.A. a serious cup contender before last season?
It wasn't until the season started and they couldn't manage to score that them being a contender looked less and less likely. But on paper at the beginning of the season, absolutely.
#11
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:37 AM
on paper?? which "star" and their star numbers on the team had you convinced that they would win a cup?I would've called them to contend for the conference finals.
It wasn't until the season started and they couldn't manage to score that them being a contender looked less and less likely. But on paper at the beginning of the season, absolutely.
And another team to talk about look at the Florida Panthers....They were ranked dead last in the pre-season rankings and what spot did they end up with at the end of the season in the 1st round of the playoffs? I just don't see that we are that bad that we are going to just barely make the playoffs even. And I never pay attention to what writers or who ever have to say. How many years now have they been writing us as too old to make the playoffs and how many times have we proven that wrong?
Edited by hillbillywingsfan, 17 August 2012 - 11:44 AM.

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#12
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:46 AM
- hillbillywingsfan and Z Winged Dangler like this
#13
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:52 AM
I said contender, not win the Cup.on paper?? which "star" and their star numbers on the team had you convinced that they would win a cup?
And another team to talk about look at the Florida Panthers....They were ranked dead last in the pre-season rankings and what spot did they end up with at the end of the season in the 1st round of the playoffs? I just don't see that we are that bad that we are going to just barely make the playoffs even. And I never pay attention to what writers or who ever have to say. How many years now have they been writing us as too old to make the playoffs and how many times have we proven that wrong?
The Kings were a great defensive team the season before last but had problems scoring consistently (sound familiar?) the addition of Richards was a huge step in giving them another offensive threat so they wouldn't just key on Kopitar and Brown. So you add scoring to a team that's got a great defensive system, good young goaltending, and maturing star players (doughty and Kopitar).
It's not like I was alone in that prediction. Again, not really as a Cup winner because they're such a young team, but I expected them to take a big step forward in the playoffs.
The Hockey News had them picked 4th in the west, above the Wings. Several "experts" on ESPN had them picked to win their division.
My main point is that people keep using the Kings as if they came out of nowhere at the end of the season, which isn't true. They were a very good team that underachieved all season and got their act together just in time. Before the season started they were expected to be a good team and contend for their division. It's just when they struggled to score and were on the verge of missing the playoffs that their change in play was so surprising.
#14
Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:56 AM
ok what about the panthers? They were ranked dead last and some how magically became 3rd seed. Who would of called that? Thats why you don't know until the playing starts and that's why these predictions are bogus.I said contender, not win the Cup.
The Kings were a great defensive team the season before last but had problems scoring consistently (sound familiar?) the addition of Richards was a huge step in giving them another offensive threat so they wouldn't just key on Kopitar and Brown. So you add scoring to a team that's got a great defensive system, good young goaltending, and maturing star players (doughty and Kopitar).
It's not like I was alone in that prediction. Again, not really as a Cup winner because they're such a young team, but I expected them to take a big step forward in the playoffs.
My main point is that people keep using the Kings as if they came out of nowhere at the end of the season, which isn't true. They were a very good team that underachieved all season and got their act together just in time. Before the season started they were expected to be a good team and contend for their division. It's just when they struggled to score and were on the verge of missing the playoffs that their change in play was so surprising.
Edited by hillbillywingsfan, 17 August 2012 - 11:57 AM.

I LIVE IN TEXAS SO I DON'T DESERVE HOCKEY
#15
Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:06 PM
I'm not disagreeing with that at all. It's always such a surprise the teams that are great on paper that don't live up to expectations, and the teams that seem to come out of nowhere.ok what about the panthers? They were ranked dead last and some how magically became 3rd seed. Who would of called that? Thats why you don't know until the playing starts and that's why these predictions are bogus.
Even the first half the season, some fans start planning parade routes because their team has played great for 30 games. Then they come back down to earth and don't even make the playoffs.
Like I said people just keep using the Kings as some team no one ever would've predicted to do well. Many people did, they just didn't live up to expectations.
#16
Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:36 PM

#17
Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:38 PM
#18
Posted 17 August 2012 - 12:41 PM
LA was 1 of those teams who underachieved these past few seasons...With the firing of Murray, and hiring of Sutter brought accountability.Would you of called L.A. a serious cup contender before last season?
I would say the Kings have a fair chance at repeating.

#19
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:53 PM
The West will be very competitive as usual, except for the first time in forever, I don't see the Red Wings as a playoff lock.

#20
Posted 17 August 2012 - 01:59 PM
im not surprised the kings won the cup. they had the players, they just needed to put it together and get the puck in the net
i agree.....and i add the same can be said of the Wings last season.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russian Youth Hockey Brawl |
General Discussion | GMRwings1983 |
|
|
|
Alberta Peewee Hockey Bans Body Checking |
General Discussion | thegerkin |
|
|
|
Mr. Hockey: The Gordie Howe Story |
General Discussion | Richdg |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














