398 replies to this topic

[MasterPavel]

Ugh, Pav and his wrist shots with a guy in front of him...

Oh you wanted him to set up a play with 7 seconds left? Lol

[Dave]

17 shots should be a goal on the board. Decent period of hockey

 

 

They did pick up the pressure in the tail end of the period. If they come out in the 2nd with the same intensity then things will be good.

[beachwing]

We carried play and it should be 1-1...happy with first. Danny and Mule both with a little energy thus far.

[Marty Barry]

Reunite the Twins.  Give the opponent at least 1 line to fear and hopefully the other guys will have something to aspire to.

[kipwinger]

Mr. Overripe is starting to remind me of Eric Cairns with his offensive productivity.  

 

And to think I had high hopes wanting him to be a starter all these years.  

 

No s***, can we please just get Tatar back up already?  I'd really love it if every time I said, "man he's got good hands" about a rookie it was immediately before or after a goal. 

[sleepwalker]

So, uh...

 

After that period, I am sure a lot of you guys and gals are reconsidering your stance on allowing coaches a challenge each game, eh? 

 

In the thread a few weeks back, I remember the vast majority, pretty much everyone here, was against allowing coaches a challenge each game.

 

This is the EXACT situation, which I pointed out in that thread, why we DO need to allow coaches a challenge.  Because when a good goal is called back due to a refs bad/wrong on ice call, it is non-reviewable.  Seems even the commentators forgot about that, as they kept talking about how it would be counted as Tootoos good goal, despite the ref calling it off...

Edited by sleepwalker, 20 March 2013 - 07:21 PM.

[unsaddleddonald]

Oh you wanted him to set up a play with 7 seconds left? Lol

 

Hah no, but that guy can never seem to miss a guy's stick/leg when he has one standing in front of him.

[Hockeymom1960]

Milbury likes the drama.  He wouldn't have liked it if he was the coach. 

[Vladifan]

That was an awful call.  Wings got screwed.  That should have been a goal.  War room should review. 

They just explained why they "couldn't" review it.  And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART  in touching the puck.  I hope the Wings get really really ticked.

[Yeti]

i hate these announcers...  they like wrong calls.  right

[evilmrt]

Watching Lafs blow out TB 4-0 and the game is not even half over. LOL poor Steve. 

[sleepwalker]

They just explained why they "couldn't" review it.  And from what I understand, the ref STILL screwed up, because Miller HAD NO PART  in touching the puck.  I hope the Wings get really really ticked.

 

Well, almost everyone here, as evidenced by the thread the other week about allowing challenges, is in favor of this blown refs call and disallowing the good goal.  I was one of the only people pointing out that this exact situation is why we need to allow coaches to challenge a refs call.  For "non-reviewable" calls like this... 

[GMRwings1983]

No s***, can we please just get Tatar back up already?  I'd really love it if every time I said, "man he's got good hands" about a rookie it was immediately before or after a goal. 

 

I'm not talking about Nyquist.  

[Hockeymom1960]

Pierre how in the hell were you able to see whether it hit Miller's stick you stupid dweeb.

[Travis]

KRONWAAAAAALLL

[Carman]

And that's why Kronwall doesn't try to hit anymore.

[Z Winged Dangler]

that was a good hit.  keep yourf****** head up Jr.  nice cryfest from the announcers

[GoWings1905]

Oh my, they called that high sticking?

[Jusek]

Finally someone got Kronwalled.

[GMRwings1983]

Dammit Kronwall.  

 

Out of all the people you could pick to lay out, you pick on some kid no one here cares about.  Do that to Parise or Heatley .