Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Lidstrom or Orr


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 Aznknight

Aznknight

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 201 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 04:31 AM

If you could sign one of them during this off season which one would you take? They're asking for a 10 year/ $95 million deal.

A little twist. Orr is 30 and Lidstrom is 25. Orr did not have his career ending injuries. Datsyuk has not been signed yet either.
You have the current Wings team with the current cap space.

I pick Lidstrom. He provides a sense of confidence in the back end during momentum swings and when it counts. Orr is number 2 to Gretzky in dominating a game but I believe Lidstrom trumps that by cancelling out their performance with his defensive prowess.

Edited by Aznknight, 24 June 2013 - 04:32 AM.


#2 Kronstantinov

Kronstantinov

    Top Prospect

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 61 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 05:06 AM

Orr is the greatest hockey player ever.



#3 wingedominance13

wingedominance13

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 384 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 07:36 AM

Both. And id only play 2 defenseman the entire game. As for salary cap issues I suppose I would have to go with a series of cheap young talent to fill out the forwards. Like 12 entry level co tracts. But think about that d pairing...

#4 unsaddleddonald

unsaddleddonald

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 748 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 08:43 AM

Serious question: what were Orr's actual defensive abilities like?

 

My impression of him as always been he was a forward who played defense (Sergei Fedorov). Was he a Karlsson/Letang?



#5 achildr1

achildr1

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,021 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 09:17 AM

Serious question: what were Orr's actual defensive abilities like?
 
My impression of him as always been he was a forward who played defense (Sergei Fedorov). Was he a Karlsson/Letang?


I'm a little curious of that too but I don't remember ever hearing anything even remotely bad about his defence.

#6 Dave

Dave

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,194 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake, Virginia

Posted 24 June 2013 - 09:23 AM

Am I the only person here who thinks that Orr would not be able to score at all in today's game? Seriously, most of his goals were garbage. He was allowed to just skate around the O zone without anyone laying a body on him. Nobody blocked shots back then like they do today. Finally, goalies have improved a s*** ton since the '70s.



#7 achildr1

achildr1

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,021 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 09:33 AM

Am I the only person here who thinks that Orr would not be able to score at all in today's game? Seriously, most of his goals were garbage. He was allowed to just skate around the O zone without anyone laying a body on him. Nobody blocked shots back then like they do today. Finally, goalies have improved a s*** ton since the '70s.

Its stuff like this that makes comparing players from different eras very hard. I think Orr would still be good but not otherworldly dominating good. Orr revolutionalized hockey for defenseman, he was a great skater, scorer, and he would fight. He was Wayne Gretzky on defense.

Your right though. The game has become incredibly more refined, coached, and defended. I think its starting to settle into the zone where it won't change much anymore without large rule changes because they've really exploited out the games deficiencies. That said, Lidstrom played during the end of the freewheeling era, the dead puck era, and the post cap era. His most clear dominance though was during the dead puck era when some teams top scorer would have 55 points. This guy was putting up 70 from defence without rushing the puck like Orr. He did all this while being the best defensive defenseman in the game with little to no physical game...I believe he was the best ever during the most refined era of hockey to date.

Edited by achildr1, 24 June 2013 - 09:34 AM.


#8 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 10:14 AM

Serious question: what were Orr's actual defensive abilities like?
 
My impression of him as always been he was a forward who played defense (Sergei Fedorov). Was he a Karlsson/Letang?


Orr was fantastic in his own end. Picture a blend between Paul Coffey at his finest and Nick Lidstrom at his finest. That's Bobby Orr at his finest.

#9 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,086 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 24 June 2013 - 10:18 AM

Orr was fantastic in his own end. Picture a blend between Paul Coffey at his finest and Nick Lidstrom at his finest. That's Bobby Orr at his finest.


Couldn't Orr not skate backwards?

Edited by number9, 24 June 2013 - 10:19 AM.


#10 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 12:08 PM

Orr was fantastic in his own end. Picture a blend between Paul Coffey at his finest and Nick Lidstrom at his finest. That's Bobby Orr at his finest.

Throw in some  Girrardi, Carkner  and Konstantinov because he blocked shots, he fought and hit with the best of them.
In the 72 Summit Series Canada had to cheat to win. Bobby Orr was injured. The Canadians easily won the 76 Canada Cup and Orr dominated the tournament.



Am I the only person here who thinks that Orr would not be able to score at all in today's game? Seriously, most of his goals were garbage. He was allowed to just skate around the O zone without anyone laying a body on him. Nobody blocked shots back then like they do today. Finally, goalies have improved a s*** ton since the '70s.

Goalie Equipment has become so much bigger since Bettman became commissioner.



#11 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    Part 3: Return of the Hammer Hands

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,219 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 24 June 2013 - 12:21 PM

Different eras....too loaded a question.  It would be better to have a comparison question in same eras, like Lidstrom vs Niedermayer and Konstantinov vs Stevens.  Things like that with similar styles.  Not just which of the 2 best Dmen of all time would you rather have questions, cause their careers had an ending and beginning gap of 15+ years.  The game changed too much to compare them.  Would you like Maurice Richard or Wayne Gretzky?  Same deal.


"I play hockey, but I am not very good.  Can someone please tell me what it would take to sign with the Wings ? I can use a million or two."  ~ arag

 

Dan Cleary is an Xbox 360.  While good for a while, it's time for the new generation to take over.


#12 Dave

Dave

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,194 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake, Virginia

Posted 24 June 2013 - 12:21 PM

Goalie Equipment has become so much bigger since Bettman became commissioner.

 

That's part of it, but they're also much more athletic. Lateral movement is an actual thing now, not just standing around until it's time to stack the pads.



#13 achildr1

achildr1

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,021 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 12:42 PM

 
That's part of it, but they're also much more athletic. Lateral movement is an actual thing now, not just standing around until it's time to stack the pads.


Butterfly goaltending basically didn't exist in the 70's, pads were very heavy and small, and goalies were ENCOURAGED to stay standing and not to go down. Couple that with a near complete lack of defensive and positioning structure at the time and you have a recipe for the unheard of point production of the 70's and 80's. Simply put...Lidstrom putting up 70 plus points in 2000 is like Orr putting up 115 or more in the early 70's. Except Lidstrom did it without rushing the puck like a forward...even if Orr was better, I don't think its near as far apart as some people will tell you.

#14 martinezsvsu

martinezsvsu

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 546 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 12:44 PM

to young to have watched orr so how the hell should i know



#15 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 01:48 PM

 

That's part of it, but they're also much more athletic. Lateral movement is an actual thing now, not just standing around until it's time to stack the pads.

They used to actually have to make a lot of saves rather than just play the angles and let the puck hit them or fall into their huge cavernous gloves. They used to have to challenge shooters, poke check actually make great glove saves. The goalie equipment was less flexible and much heavier back then too.


Edited by Johnz96, 24 June 2013 - 02:33 PM.


#16 Dave

Dave

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,194 posts
  • Location:Chesapeake, Virginia

Posted 24 June 2013 - 01:56 PM

They used to actually have to make a lot of saves rather than just play the angles and let the puck hit them or follow into their huge cavernous gloves. They used to have to challenge shooters, poke check actually make great glove saves. The goalie equipment was less flexible and much heavier back then too.

 

Goalies these days actually know how to go down and get back up in a timely fashion. They don't just lay on their back flailing their legs around hoping to miracle a save.

 

It seems like 50% of the highlights from that era involve the goalie comically over-committing, and not being able to recover.



#17 Uncle Danny

Uncle Danny

    2nd Line Scorer

  • HoF Booster
  • 683 posts
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 24 June 2013 - 02:03 PM

to young to have watched orr so how the hell should i know

 

Came here to post something similar.  The number of people here who are qualified to answer this question is likely incredibly low.  I'm 40 and have been watching hockey most of my life, and there is no way I can give an informed opinion based on firsthand experience.  I'm guessing that I skew older than most posters here, to boot.


If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:
THE ONLY PROOF HE NEEDED
FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS MUSIC
-- Kurt Vonnegut

#18 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,510 posts
  • Location:Washington, District of Columbia

Posted 24 June 2013 - 03:35 PM


Goalie Equipment has become so much bigger since Bettman became commissioner.

 

Oh here we go again.  Here's three pictures, one from a goalie today (2013), the next from a goalie the year before Bettman took over (1992), and one from twenty years before that (1972).  To me it seems like the size of goalie equipment has changed less in the last twenty years than it did in the twenty before that.  So I'm guessing this argument of yours is simply another attempt to blame Gary Bettman for something that you don't happen to like, whether he's at fault or not. 

 

 

Pekka%20Rinne.jpg

 

 

tumblr_m1idj8TTkm1qm9rypo1_1280.jpg

 

 

plante.jpg


Edited by kipwinger, 24 June 2013 - 03:49 PM.

GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#19 Hockeymom1960

Hockeymom1960

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,837 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 04:19 PM

 

Goalies these days actually know how to go down and get back up in a timely fashion. They don't just lay on their back flailing their legs around hoping to miracle a save.

 

It seems like 50% of the highlights from that era involve the goalie comically over-committing, and not being able to recover.

 

Hey now, tell that to Hasek ;)



#20 Johnz96

Johnz96

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,423 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 05:16 PM

 

Oh here we go again.  Here's three pictures, one from a goalie today (2013), the next from a goalie the year before Bettman took over (1992), and one from twenty years before that (1972).  To me it seems like the size of goalie equipment has changed less in the last twenty years than it did in the twenty before that.  So I'm guessing this argument of yours is simply another attempt to blame Gary Bettman for something that you don't happen to like, whether he's at fault or not. 

 

 

Pekka%20Rinne.jpg

 

 

tumblr_m1idj8TTkm1qm9rypo1_1280.jpg

 

 

plante.jpg

 

 

essensa.jpg

Bob Essensa circa 93-94

essensa.jpg

A few years later with the Oilers. The net (and he is deeper in it even) and even the stick look so much smaller than in the pic above.


Edited by Johnz96, 24 June 2013 - 05:32 PM.






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users