Buppy 1,720 Report post Posted February 27, 2016 The Avs were a stronger team. Their players as whole were better than ours specially in goals. I was sure we were going to lose this match. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Not sure about "players as a whole", but damn, Sakic's wrist shot would still be one of the best in the league. We still would've won if we'd had Sergei, Kozlov, Ozzie, and Vernon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kickazz 5,459 Report post Posted February 27, 2016 We would have won if we had Fedorov for sure. Feds can still play very well. The last game at The Big House he looked like he hadn't missed a beat. Everyone else on our roster yesterday looked slowwwwwwwwwww. 1 NerveDamage reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
puckloo39 5,686 Report post Posted February 28, 2016 Was FSD broadcasting this game, or only the Avs network? I would have loved to hear Darrin and Kenny, or someone who actually mentioned the Wings. Draper said the pre-game highlights confused him. He was pretty sure the Wings had scored quite a few goals, especially in 2002. But all they showed was Avs scoring and running the Wings. Homers much, Colorado? 1 NerveDamage reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
toby91_ca 620 Report post Posted February 28, 2016 I totally forgot about this and missed the game, but read something funny in an article recapping the game. They mentioned Stevie's goal and then they said the best #19 (Sakic) to play scored after the 3rd best (Yzerman)....they mentioned Toews is the 2nd best. Of course, there was a note that was put in there to say that was just to anger Wings fans. Thought is was funny with all the overrated discussion regarding Toews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeymom1960 5,107 Report post Posted February 28, 2016 (edited) I totally forgot about this and missed the game, but read something funny in an article recapping the game. They mentioned Stevie's goal and then they said the best #19 (Sakic) to play scored after the 3rd best (Yzerman)....they mentioned Toews is the 2nd best. Of course, there was a note that was put in there to say that was just to anger Wings fans. Thought is was funny with all the overrated discussion regarding Toews. I thought it was funny they had to try so hard to make the Avs seem the better team all around. If you have to do that then you definitely aren't the better team Edited February 28, 2016 by Hockeymom1960 2 puckloo39 and Barrie reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted February 29, 2016 The Avs were a stronger team. Their players as whole were better than ours specially in goals. I was sure we were going to lose this match. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk My comments had to do with being the better team from 1996-2002. We won the rivalry in 2002 with blow out in Game 7, and winning a 3rd Cup. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
