Jump to content

joshy207's Photo


Member Since 19 Jun 2002
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 09:22 PM

#2469421 World Juniors Tourney Thread

Posted by joshy207 on 01 January 2014 - 04:03 AM


it is toronto in 2015, then montreal in 2017




"In 2015, Montreal will host the preliminary round group including Canada’s National Junior Team, as well as two quarter-finals, for a total of 12 tournament games. Toronto will host the other preliminary round group, plus two quarter-finals, the relegation series, fifth-place game, both semifinals and both medal games, for a total of 19 games. Canada will move from Montreal to Toronto for the medal round.

Everything will be reversed in 2017 – Canada’s preliminary round group will play in Toronto, while Montreal will host the medal round. The number of games in each market for 2017 will be finalized at a later date."

#2468453 World Juniors Tourney Thread

Posted by joshy207 on 30 December 2013 - 01:00 PM

Could be a huge swing here, Mantha goal and a PP right after.

Mantha definitely knows how to find the back of the net.  You can't teach that.


As we've seen SO many times with the Wings, it's quality of shots, not quantity, that really matters...

#2468009 Drop the announcer and "Light the lamp goal"

Posted by joshy207 on 28 December 2013 - 07:30 PM

Obviously, DTE is shelling out money for that.  No different than a "Belle Tire Power Play" or the "Call Sam Studios" on TV.  I agree though, it's annoying.

#2467799 I'd like to talk about this off-season/next season

Posted by joshy207 on 27 December 2013 - 01:33 AM

Supposedly, Sheahan, Ferraro, Callahan, and Almquist are out of options next year and would have to clear waivers to be sent down.  Depending on who Holland can (and actually WOULD) move this summer, most, if not all, of those guys might be here.  I can see Ferraro being let go, he hasn't even gotten a sniff of NHL action yet... Callahan and Almquist could stay or go, depending on roster limitations, and Sheahan should be up next year.  Glendening could beat out Callahan and Ferraro, but I believe he is still waiver-exempt.  Ouellet (and Sproul) still have waiver exemptions, and I'd venture a guess that Holland will use those and let them develop in GR for another year.


I'd let every UFA walk, with the possible exception of Alfredsson.  I'd try and move Kindl for a mid-round pick (3rd/4th).  I would explore moving Franzen, maybe see if Vancouver is interested in trading Edler for him... Edler and a F prospect (Cole Cassels?) for Franzen and a D prospect (Sproul?)  Explore the veteran backup goalie market, but strongly consider the fact that Mrazek might be the backup next year.  Howard gets 55-60 starts, Mrazek the rest.  Then explore the UFA market, see if there are any good fits at top-6 F and mid-level D.  DO NOT "OVERBUILD" THE ROSTER.  This season's roster management has been nothing short of an embarrassment.  Sticking NHL-caliber forwards in the AHL because you can't trade them and don't have room for them is NOT a good look.  Especially when you re-signed a washed-up returning veteran after training camp opened and you did not have the room to do so.  I think Holland has made a lot of miscalculations since 2009, and I think he has THIS SUMMER to make up for them.  If he can't, then it's time for someone else to step in.  This club is ripe for some change... I think too many guys are content here.

#2465172 Can't remember the last time we were this pathetic

Posted by joshy207 on 15 December 2013 - 11:19 PM

Sheahan, Ferraro, and Callahan are 4th liners, too.  No better than what is already here.  Just younger.  I think a strong dose of fresh blood is needed... this team is stale.  Too many guys who have been here for too long, too comfortable.  That includes management and coaching.  Status quo has become acceptable.  For a team that says they expect to win, not winning seems to be OK.  You can't have it both ways...

#2461874 I'd like to talk about this off-season/next season

Posted by joshy207 on 07 December 2013 - 12:03 PM

The reason you seriously explore buying out Franzen isn't his streakiness, perceived laziness, or cap hit... it's the length of his contract and his age.  He will turn 34 in a couple weeks, and he is signed for SIX more seasons after this.  Do you honestly see him playing until age 40?  I don't.  If he does retire before the end of his contract, the Wings are subject to a cap-recapture penalty.  Depending on when he hypothetically retires, that penalty could be almost $3M per year.  This calls for an open and honest discussion between Franzen, his agent, and Wings' management.  If Franzen doesn't want to play until he's 40, they should buy him out.

The one fly in the ointment is Weiss.  If he continues to struggle all season, he's the top candidate for the last compliance buyout.

#2451489 Tootoo Waived

Posted by joshy207 on 06 November 2013 - 10:02 PM

Yes re-entry waivers should be gone. I was referring to if we sent him back down to grr once he came back up to the NHL. If we wanted to send him down once more, that's where I was confused if he would be exempt from passing waivers again and technically on a two way contract from that point on.

 This would have nothing to do with a one-way or two-way contract.  A two-way (NHL/AHL) contract means a player gets paid one salary in the NHL and another (smaller) in the AHL.  Players in the AHL on a one-way NHL contract get paid the same salary they would make in the NHL.

#2451246 A story about Chelios

Posted by joshy207 on 05 November 2013 - 04:23 PM

I find it amazing how close his career came to NEVER HAPPENING AT ALL.  Talk about being down to your last chance...

#2450226 Helm in, Franzen out against the Oil tonight!

Posted by joshy207 on 02 November 2013 - 09:25 PM

If Helm was really back to form, he would have missed on that breakaway...  lol

#2450209 Franzen believes hes playing well.

Posted by joshy207 on 02 November 2013 - 09:22 PM

Someone (Alfredsson?  Zetterberg?  Kronwall?) needs to tell Franzen to keep his stinkin' mouth SHUT.

#2447901 John Tortorella's other side (wow)

Posted by joshy207 on 26 October 2013 - 01:44 PM

It's really amazing how many NHL guys (players, former players, coaches, etc) do things like this.  Maybe not quite as much as Tortorella in this case, but it happens way more frequently than we hear about.  Most hockey guys are pretty grounded, they are generally good guys, even the ones you love to hate.

#2447685 What's Killing Our Offense?

Posted by joshy207 on 24 October 2013 - 08:59 PM

We've drafted really well at forward, IMHO. Names:















That's an extraordinarily good group, considering we haven't picked in the top twenty since, what, Marty Lapointe? And our D group is nothing to sneeze at.


All of which is to say: I believe drafting is one thing we've been getting very right.


True, there's been a bit of a dry spell lately, but in the coming years that will change. My only worry is, of course, the clock that's ticking on Z and D's careers. I want as many of our young guys to learn as much as they can from those two.


All enticing prospects, yes, but for now they are just prospects.  We can grade the drafting in 5 or so years after we see how many of these guys make the NHL.

#2443593 Mantha signed to ELC

Posted by joshy207 on 12 October 2013 - 06:01 PM

This contract is subject to the Slide Rule, where it will not officially start until Mantha plays* (see below) for Detroit or Grand Rapids (or any other pro team)... so if he stays in the Q all year, the three years of his deal will be 14/15, 15/16, and 16/17.  It will not count against the 50-man limit this year as long as he is not called up.


Mantha can stay in the Q with a pro contract.  This happens all the time.  Frk and Nedomlel were signed last year but stayed in junior.


This situation is precisely why players lose NCAA eligibility if they play in the CHL.  The NCAA isn't so much concerned with the (small) pay the CHLers receive, but with the fact that amateur players are playing against players already signed to pro contracts.


*The Wings could call up Mantha and have him play up to 9 games, then send him back to junior and not have his contract officially start.  Recently, the Jets did this with Mark Scheifele.  The Flames are contemplating keeping Sean Monahan or returning him to junior.  The last Wing I can remember who was in that situation was Martin Lapointe.

#2443307 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by joshy207 on 11 October 2013 - 03:15 AM


Somethings you were unaware of or simply forgot in your rant:


Tatar was in the AHL (tearing it up mind you) during the push for the playoffs at the end of the season. His last game with the Wings was 3/10.


The Wings offered Brunner basically the same offer he signed, but they offered it to him before Free Agency even began, and BRUNNER TURNED IT DOWN. Him not being here has nothing to do with Holland and Babcock!


Also the biggest reasons the Wings still made the playoffs was the TWO WAY play (yes offense and defense) of guys like Dats and Z, you know vets, and the other was the play of Howard.


Brunner scored 5 points in the month of April, you know the stretch run, in which a vet by the name of Dan Cleary had the same Point Total?


Nyquist put up 4 points in the month of April, the same as Flip, a vet who plays a two way game, yet was just let go for under performing and the money he wanted.


For contrast purposes Z had 13 points in April and Dats had 14.


So other than stating facts that are simply not facts and/or ignoring the contributions of the Vets,  your post was spot on!

Your points are valid, so please don't think I'm upset, but I can answer them:

-I know Tatar was in the AHL from March on.  I was disappointed when he was sent back down.  I thought when he was here, he was the 2nd best forward in the lineup behind Datsyuk.  Tatar made something happen on most of his shifts.  Few other guys were doing that at that time.

-Brunner did turn down a decent offer, yes.  That's on him and his agent.  I was disappointed that Holland didn't do more to keep Brunner, but giving away the farm would not have been a smart move.

-I said ONE OF the biggest reasons the Wings made the playoffs was the play of the young guys.  One of.  But a big one.  Had they come up and not performed, this team would not have made the post-season.  As it is, they made it on the last day, by one point.  The #1 reason they made it was Jimmy Howard's play.  He was rock-solid from about 3 weeks in until the very end.  Team MVP, no question.  Datsyuk's and Zetterberg's play and leadership were also huge.

-As for the points in April, that's fine.  I'll still argue that the third line of Andersson, Brunner, and Nyquist was an important part of the Wings' making the playoffs and advancing as far as they did.

-Filppula DID underperform.  He has every season but 2011-12.  For all his talent, he should produce more than he does.  I see he's off to a good start in Tampa... it'll be interesting to see how his season goes.

-Dan Cleary has been brutal for the last two years.  Brutal.  He had a good, productive playoffs, yes... but he's back to being brutal so far this year.

-I did not "ignore" the contributions of veteran players, my post was not meant to be a complete and total summary of last season.  I was simply pointing out how some important parts of last year's team are being pushed aside at this time for players that I feel have less to offer.

#2442974 Will young talent ever speak out against Wings philosophy?

Posted by joshy207 on 10 October 2013 - 12:41 PM

I agree I thought last year was the perfect mix of veterans and youngsters with the forward group.
Youngsters together on the third line playing against other teams third pairing D makes a lot of sense to me and it seemed to work out well.

Maybe too many youngsters on the defensive corps

It's kind of strange. I think we would benefit from more youngsters on offense, like the third line of Nyquist Andy and Tatar, but last year I think we would have benefited in the playoffs with the veteran experience of Ian White over the inexperience of young Smith.
Yes Babcock chooses opposite. Hmm.


I agree.  One of the reasons the Wings even made the playoffs was because of the play of Brunner, Andersson, Nyquist, and Tatar.  But it wasn't the Wings' plan to have them in the lineup (except Brunner, who was a low-risk gamble).  So, as a thank-you to those players, Andersson gets saddled with 2 corpses for linemates, Tatar gets a seat in the press box, Brunner gets some black added to his uniform (NJ, where he has 3G/1A in 4GP but is a -3), and Nyquist isn't even in the league right now.  Nice reward, eh?

At some point, leaving a player in the AHL becomes counterproductive.  The AHL game is noticeably slower than the NHL game.  There's only so much you can learn there.  You cannot adjust to NHL play in the AHL.  Andersson, Nyquist, and Tatar all showed very well in the NHL last year, showed they were ready for regular NHL duty.  Brunner also proved he can play in the league.  Why was that not good enough for Holland and Babcock?

Are there better defensive players than Brunner, Tatar, and Nyquist?  Yes.  But defensive awareness comes with experience, which you can only get with experience.  You have to play.  In the NHL.  Was Yzerman a good defensive player in the first half of his career?  NO.  The vast majority of NHLers aren't.  It's not fair to expect that from rookies.

If anyone can explain to me the benefits (short-term and long-term) of playing Samuelsson, Cleary, and Bertuzzi over Nyquist and Tatar, please, go for it!