NerveDamage 4,176 Report post Posted April 1, 2016 Caption this 1 Jacksoni reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 1, 2016 I'm usually pro Ericsson just because of how negative everyone is towards him I don't think he's that bad but switching him and Smith could be a pivotal moment for the defense. They have been completely awful down the stretch and with Marchenko up as a shut down guy I think we need smith in the lineup. Sitting Ericsson might smarten everyone up Ericsson is pretty decent on his forehand, with about 1 second to make a decision when moving the puck up in our zone. Unfortunately, he doesn't have that luxury in the NHL. And not in the AHL mostly. And not in the Swedish elite league. Both AHL and SHL has become faster, making big E obsolote. Guess he can't be moved at all even if we were to retain 75% of his salary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 1, 2016 (edited) Just a quick addon. I've been looking at what's required for us to make the playoffs as in who needs to win and loose this last stretch and it fried my grey matter. Literally. I found a nice video about timelines in the Terminator movie series that sort of gets the point across. Fair to say, our chances are slim in case you don't want to watch. Scroll to about 3 minutes for a depicting allegory of my meltdown regarding our playoff chances. Edited April 1, 2016 by Jacksoni Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BottleOfSmoke 5,965 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 Break it to me gently--what are our chances now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hack & Whack Rule! 160 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 50/50...either we make it or we don't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Larktha7139 6 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 Ether way, we control our destiny, we win our games were in, we lose were out.... We don't need to hope teams take care of business for us.... We play Boston... We can do our own dirty work and insure that we are in.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesusberg 1,256 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 The Leafs are starting Sparks tonight. Bernier had a 1.92 GAA, and .938 Sv% in March, which includes his shutout against Detroit. It sure feels like Babcock is throwing the Wings a softball here. 1 amato reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewK80 39 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 We've lost 5 shootouts. Win one of those and we're tied with Boston right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 The Leafs are starting Sparks tonight. Bernier had a 1.92 GAA, and .938 Sv% in March, which includes his shutout against Detroit. It sure feels like Babcock is throwing the Wings a softball here. Oh God. You know how we like to make nobody goalies into stars. 1 Aethernum reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aethernum 276 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 We've lost 5 shootouts. Win one of those and we're tied with Boston right now. Philly could say the same thing about their eight shootout losses. Well...not the same thing, they wouldn't be tied with Boston, but a similar thing... Oh God. You know how we like to make nobody goalies into stars. Right. If anything, I'd say this isn't Babcock throwing us a bone - this is him playing deliberately into the stupid things he knows we always do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 2, 2016 The Leafs are starting Sparks tonight. Bernier had a 1.92 GAA, and .938 Sv% in March, which includes his shutout against Detroit. It sure feels like Babcock is throwing the Wings a softball here. Bernier manhandled us the last game. I'll take that bone and chew it up. Need the two points and Babs need to loose 2 points. Let's make both sides happy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Travco 11 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 I'm really hoping to overtake Boston, nobody wants the Caps in the first round.Also Boston missing the playoffs 2 years in a row would be so delightful. 2 RedWingsRox and Jacksoni reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedWingsRox 614 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 (edited) Caption this We got replaced by rats !! The Leafs are starting Sparks tonight. Bernier had a 1.92 GAA, and .938 Sv% in March, which includes his shutout against Detroit. It sure feels like Babcock is throwing the Wings a softball here. So if the streak continues we can still credit Babcock? Edited April 3, 2016 by RedWingsRox 1 NerveDamage reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FireCaptain 563 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Detroit Red Wings Playoff ChancesBeat Toronto 3-2, playoff odds up 8 to 48.8% 91 points 40 28-11 Basically any combination of W/L that doesn't result in us winning out the season , dooms us to no post-season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewK80 39 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Chicago was up 6-0 on Boston.. Now it's 6-4! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nyquistfan14 489 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Anyone know the odds now after the Bruins loss ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 After Boston's loss against Chicago we get: National Hockey League Playoff ChancesDetroit +8.0, Boston -8.9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kickazz 5,459 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 (edited) 48.8 + 7.1 55.9% If Pittsburg wins it becomes 60.7% Edited April 3, 2016 by kickazz Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 After Boston's loss against Chicago we get:National Hockey League Playoff ChancesDetroit +8.0, Boston -8.9 Did you get that from a website, or are you just guessing? Wings were 48.8% going into the game, Boston was 70.5% http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html If we're at 56.8% now, that makes sense, but Boston has to be under 50% after losing to the Black Hawks, unless I'm missing something. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Did you get that from a website, or are you just guessing? Wings were 48.8% going into the game, Boston was 70.5% http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL.html If we're at 56.8% now, that makes sense, but Boston has to be under 50% after losing to the Black Hawks, unless I'm missing something. Go to the link you provided. Read the Second Line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Go to the link you provided. Read the Second Line. That was from yesterday, now it's 68.4% for us, and 42.4% for the Bruins http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL2.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 That was from yesterday, now it's 68.4% for us, and 42.4% for the Bruins http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL2.html LOL. These stats are so stupid. We have two games on the road and three in four, including a back to back. The computer isn't smart enough to consider something called "common sense". 1 KingBobCat reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Yep was just about to say that. You can disregard those stats. Boston should be a clear favorite to make the playoffs. All games at home. No back-to-back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NerveDamage 4,176 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 (edited) Yep was just about to say that. You can disregard those stats. Boston should be a clear favorite to make the playoffs. All games at home. No back-to-back. receiving Carolina and Ottawa, whilst others have a tighter schedule. Us facing both Boston and Philly plus the Rangers. Philly has 2 games against the Pens. Isles playing Tampa, Washington and the Rangers Edited April 3, 2016 by NerveDamage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jacksoni 418 Report post Posted April 3, 2016 Yeah. Those odds sure don't reflect that. I'd guess.. 20%. And I'm being optimistic. :/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
