Jump to content


roboturner's Photo

roboturner

Member Since 09 Apr 2008
Offline Last Active Yesterday, 04:53 PM
*----

Posts I've Made

In Topic: 10/18 GDT - Maple Leafs 0 at Red Wings 1 (OT)

18 October 2014 - 11:14 PM

How many does Howard have now?

I don't know. He might have 1 or he might have 100. Its all just sooooo subjective. I'll leave it to Jeremy Ronick, Mike Milbury and the rest of the experts to tell me.


In Topic: 10/18 GDT - Maple Leafs 0 at Red Wings 1 (OT)

18 October 2014 - 09:32 PM

 

Only if your counting bad pass goals as well

 

You have to average it with the bad pass goal coefficient. ;)

Fear the beard. Looking foward to seeing the dvr of it.

1: "Datsyuk has 'X' amount of takeaways this season, and 'Y' amount led to goals"

 

2: "Datsyuk Howard has 'X' amount of takeaways giveaways this season, and 'Y' amount led to goals"

 

3. "Datsyuk Smith had 'X' amount of takeaways giveaways last season, and 'Y' amount led to goals"

 

If you are fine with two of those stats, but claim the second one is just 'made-up'.....you might have a bias!


In Topic: LGW Moderator Problems

15 October 2014 - 06:56 PM

I understand it wouldn't work in all cases and I guess I'm fine to remove them when it's descended into nothing but insults (like you can't even make a point to include with your insults!).

 

For example:

If you had a lines thread, and then it turned into what line abdelkader should play on, and then it turned into a discussion about only abdelkader and what he would bring to each line, and then it goes to just abdelkader stats and intangibles.....

 

Well at some point you could just split it into two threads. People who want to keep talking about abdelkader can do so in the new thread and people that want to talk about the rest of the lines can continue in the old thread.

 

EDIT: Maybe abdelkader example is something you might just let go. If it's some polarizing topic at the moment that keeps getting brought into discussions (like Cleary or Howard or Holland) that people are getting sick of, then split it up and remind people that they don't have to go into the new thread if they don't want to discuss the topic  :)


In Topic: LGW Moderator Problems

15 October 2014 - 05:58 PM

I'd vote for the split thread idea. If some conversation evolves into something else and you really, really don't want it to continue in that thread, then why not just grab all the posts and stick them in a new thread (or an appropriate existing thread) with a link to said thread? 


In Topic: LGW Moderator Problems

15 October 2014 - 05:29 PM

Maybe it'd be possible to let the person know before you change it. It would give them a chance to rework or reword a post in a way that would be more suitable.