Lidstrom, yes.
- Rick D likes this
Male
Posted by hooon
on 25 June 2012 - 10:16 PM
Not if they trade Paul Martin and his $5 million contract which they are trying to do. That will give them more money than the Wings. I don't like it at all but Pittsburgh may be a more desirable place to play given the age of their key players.
Posted by hooon
on 21 June 2012 - 05:34 PM
Posted by hooon
on 19 June 2012 - 09:35 PM
Stewart has similar scoring ability to Ryan, is much stronger and tougher and would be much cheaper in a trade and against the cap
Posted by hooon
on 13 June 2012 - 03:42 PM
Posted by hooon
on 11 June 2012 - 11:08 PM
Posted by hooon
on 01 June 2012 - 02:13 PM
Posted by hooon
on 01 June 2012 - 01:59 PM
It'll be tough making the playoffs next season unless we have a huge offseason signing.
We finished 5th this season and the West is getting more and more competitive each year. Also, the Wings looked putrid when Lidstrom was injured late in the season.
It'll likely be a dogfight to get one of those last few spots. A Parise or Suter would make that easier of course.
Posted by hooon
on 25 May 2012 - 04:26 PM
Posted by hooon
on 21 May 2012 - 05:19 PM
5. I posted this on another thread as well, but needs to be repeated here. In general, men reach their physical peaks around 27. if you go look at players in every sport, they generally have their best years from age 27-32. yes you can have some freaks come along, but those are rare. Ideally, 1/3 to 1/2 of the team would be in this age group. it is hard to get to 1/2 now with the cap, because guys this age in their primes, get paid premium dollars. But a team should have 10+ guys between 27 and 32. With the balance split equally between those younger and older than this group. In a perfect world, you have 11 guys between 27-32, 6 guys 26 and younger, and 6 guys 33 and older. if things are really going well, your top 3 forwards, top 2 dmen, and starting goalie are in the group 27-32.
Posted by hooon
on 11 May 2012 - 09:11 PM
Gives new meaning to go 5 hole, back door, and top shelf.
Posted by hooon
on 08 May 2012 - 01:42 PM
Suter Yes! parise? No thanks. Just don't see it. he is a small sniping forward that is weak on D. Most of us agree that the RW need to be bigger, faster, younger, and grittier. parise costs a ton of money and doesn't solve but half of those problems. How does a guy that scores 35 goals, end up with a -5 rating on a defensive focused team like the devils? Hulder is a 3 million per year player that scores 25 goals. parise is a 6+ million player that scores you 35 goals. Are ten more goals worth 3 million more? No. I would take a Hudler and Jones combo over parise every day of the week, and I am not a fan of Hudler at all. Doan and jones would be even better!
Posted by hooon
on 25 April 2012 - 02:02 PM
Could you imagine if they kept Suter and signed Parise?
Find content