• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
aflac9262

Game 4: (4/19) Red Wings @ Flames (LIVE)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest Jdog21

This is how I see it. 3-3 going into the last 3 or 4 minutes, Detroit scores a late goal, then puts in the empty netter and lands themselves a 5-3 win.

No i see the FLAMERS winning 4-3 sorry guys i have no hope for this one only because like i said the REFS wont let the Wings win <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did babs turn down the 2nd period interview with FSN? Hopefully he is in the room ***** slapping the team to wake them the hell up!

Zeta you are on the 1st line using precious minutes... DO SOMETHING!

Edited by OsGOD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And like I said earlier, I seriously think a LOT of the blame for our inept PP can be placed on Babcock's shoulders for consistently putting Sammy in there on the point.

Maybe Babcock figures that Sammy shoots from the blueline no matter what the situation is,he might as well put him there on the PP.

Sammy should be watching the game from a suite upstairs.Give Hudler a chance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the deal with the Wings' power play? Every shot is from a wierd angle or the blue line. The puck isn't being worked down low at all. Kipper's positioning is too good to hope to get screens, and these blueliners are all either being blocked or easily saved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go away FLAMER troll and take you stupid hat with you, ya know the ones that all Flamer fans are wearing right now.

Cool it, right now. It's not up to you to determine who posts here and who does not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm thinking, and hoping, that "IF" we lose tonight.. which I think we won't... but IF we do.. i hope Babcock takes sammy out and puts Huds back in... 2-0 with huds in the line-up.

I totally agree, the hudler, flip, and franzen line was awesome. Everytime that Samuelson steps on the ice i cringe, i can't stand him. He has even been played on the penalty kills and near the end of game 3, what is babs thinking?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Samuelsson plays in Game 5, I will seriously start to consider some sort of conspiracy at work.

And, yeah, the special teams are ruining this game for us. The power play has been atrocious, and there really isn't any excuse for it. It's damn hard to figure out.

Although it might not be a popular decision, I think if the Datsyuk-Zetterberg-Holmstrom line continues to be inefficient, you have to split it up for Game 5. They haven't been terrible, but it's not clicking and I think Zetterberg needs to be shaken up.

With all that being said, we're right in this game. Still, I'm sick and tired of this incompetent effort when we play in cities like Calgary. I don't care that the building is loud and the Flames are a much better team on home ice. At some point you just have to fight through that.

Edited by RedWingsFanatic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, There are 2 teams on the ice? ...Oh wait..I'm confuzed to who's on the ice. Is it Detroit playing the Refs or Calgary? As bad as the Wings are playing..the refs are atrocious.

Our special teams is so bad it's almost funny. Our blueline shots..Calgary scores from down low..occasionally shooting from the point. We rely only on the shot from Schneider or Lidstrom to go in..no one else shoots. It's rediculously obvious to whats wrong with the powerplay...

Then, the P-Kill. Every other team in the NHL is always on the puck carrier..constant pressure causing mistakes. The Wings give way too much of a cushion, allowing Calgary to set up and shoot non-stop.

This is rediculous.

Edited by CMatt89

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No i see the FLAMERS winning 4-3 sorry guys i have no hope for this one only because like i said the REFS wont let the Wings win <_<

Thats great. But thats not how I see it. And you know it wouldnt kill you to be positive. Be careful what you predict.

YOU LOSE NOTHING IN BEING POSITIVE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...that's it! I cannot watch another minute of what USED to be Hockey! Sheesh! I cannot beleive how bad the game has been ruined with the crap they call penalties!!! Obvious penaties are NOT called and crap like Datsyuk and Iginla's hooking calls, although Jeromes was closer to being a hook than Dats, but Sheesh, if the REAL game of Hockey was being played NEITHER of those would have been. And neither would half the calls tonight! I'm done! Until Betman is fired and the game is restored, I will not watch another game, even if the Wings go on to win the Cup, my taste buds are ruined! Thanks Bettman you f&cking a$$hole! I am shutting my DVR off right now! I quit!

Sleep well... :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jdog21

hey here is an idea. Maybe the wings should make use of the very rare PP opportunities they have. Quit looking so darn sloppy and please for the love of god get Lang and Sammy out of the PP PLEASE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OKay, enough with the BS about the stupid flames can only score on the PP. why cant detroit? we've had only ONE more PP than you... and so the question is.. if the both teams ar ebeing called on the same crap, why arent the wings adjusting and the flames are? quit the dumb whining.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jdog21

WOW it seems everyone is seeing the REFS are bad LOL even Babcock admits it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

O cry me a god damn river about the FLames getting 2 5 on 3's. First be at least honest that the Flames scored on one of them, not both. The 5th wing was back in the defensive zone for the 1st goal. Also, if you want to complain about how "good" goals are.. go play in a pick up league where you can be fancy and winning is a pure skills competition. This is the NHL playoffs. One of your goals was a lucky and weird bounce off the boards that went right in front of the net on to Berts stick, so if you're going to whine and pull the "quality of goals" card.. at least get it right. Jeebus.

You're right.. they technically only scored on one of the 5 on 3s... but let's add things up shall we...

the first penalty was taken at 6:28, the second at 7:16.... now Calgary's goal came at 8:29... so they literally scored the second after the first penalty was over...

so if the "4th wing was back in the defensive zone for the first goal", he must be one hell of a power skater.

jackass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if i was babcock id be ripping the whole damn team a new one, why the refs have played horrible still doesnt give the excuse how horrible the PP has been. (thats when we actually do get one, and not have turn into a 4-4 seconds later)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey here is an idea. Maybe the wings should make use of the very rare PP opportunities they have. Quit looking so darn sloppy and please for the love of god get Lang and Sammy out of the PP PLEASE

No kidding, they have looked completely lost on the PP for the most part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe how the Red Wings don't have the killer instinct.

They should have killed the Flames in game 3 and make it 3-0.

But no, instead they gave the Flames a second wind...

My God, I mean, the Flames are a crappy team that can hardly score goals and there are our fancy Red Wings team struggling once again against the 8th place seed in the first round...

PATHETIC!!!

Anyway I feel that if Detroit gets by Calgary, they will get destroy in the next round.

The Wings are only good playing in a crappy division beating crappy teams (Chicago, Columbus, St-Louis) in the regular season and then losing in the first playoff round...

that's it, I've had enough!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this