Will Stuart re-sign?
#21
Posted 13 November 2011 - 03:52 PM
We could get someone who's younger to take his spot.
Red Wings
Tigers
Roughriders
Lions
Spartans
Pistons
#22
Posted 13 November 2011 - 04:03 PM
He hasn't had a good season so far and surely the great Kenny Holland could find a comparable replacement with so much cap space, especially if Lidstrom retires also.
#23
Posted 13 November 2011 - 04:05 PM
Well by stay at home, tough defenseman standards he is one of the best.I've never seen Tim Gleason as anything more than an average defenseman.
I don't understand this mentality. He grew up in Michigan. Whoopee. What's the big deal?
5th in the league in hits last year, more blocked shots than any wing last season,logs 21 minutes a night 3 mins of which is short handed. Hes one of the most solid stay at home types in the league and was a good enough for the silver medal winning olympic hockey team.
Hes a pretty big upgrade over Stuart, he does everything he does plus fights and is 4 years younger.
As for the Michigan thing, we're talking about a guy who is leaving the most successful franchise of the last 20 years to be near his family most likely, and you dont think being from Michigan could have an effect?
The face of American hockey who had played for one organization for his whole career signed a one year with Detroit because its where hes from and tarnished a great legacy in many people's eyes.
Being from the area has a huge effect for a lot of players its pretty obvious, its obviously a big deal to be near their families and where they grew up
RIP BOB PROBERT #24
#24
Posted 13 November 2011 - 05:10 PM
I wouldn't be upset if Stuart left after this year. I can understand that he wants to be closer to his family, and family ultimately overrides hockey. He's looked sluggish this year. He's been a big part of our defense since he was acquired in '07/'08, but I think there are better options out there. If Lidstrom retires after the season, and Stuart leaves to be closer to his family, and Commodore is let go for another #7 defenseman, the defense will look a lot different. Too early to accurately predict anythingobviously, but I'll throw this out there:
X-Kronwall
X-White
Ericsson-Kindl
X/Smith
Possible replacements for Lidstrom:
Ryan Suter
Shea Weber (Long-shot, but still)
Possible replacements for Stuart:
Tim Gleason
Sheldon Souray
Adrian Aucoin
Willie Mitchell
Cory Sarich
Possible replacements for Commodore:
Jim Vandermeer
Bryan Allen
Sheldon Brookbank
Shane O'Brien
Suter-Kronwall
Gleason-White
Ericsson-Kindl
O'Brien
Why no Smith?
#25
Posted 13 November 2011 - 05:25 PM
Do you think they'll have him in GR for another year? Or do you think he'll be a full-time Wing next year? I think they'll give him a few games next year, but they typically wait till they're "Over-ripe".Why no Smith?
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#26
Posted 13 November 2011 - 06:06 PM
Would the neg bandits kindly explain to me what about this post warranted a -2? You wouldn't want Suter or Weber or Penner or 2 more Stanley Cups? Would you rather lose Stuart for nothing? So it wouldn't be a good idea to trade him before he leaves or sign/trade him if his heart is in LA? Do you hate Stuart so much that the mere idea of someone mentioned re-sign him makes you sick? Don't just neg someone, be a man and step up and explain the reason you disagree, instead of hiding...Well, I would hope that if he does want to move closer to home next year he does one of two things, A. Tells the Wings early enough of his decision so they can trade him to LA at the deadline for Penner or 2. HE lets them know he wants to finish the year out with the Wings and THEN go home, so after the season he re-signs a sign and trade contract with the Wings that the Kings like and gets's traded to the Kings for Penner (who also does a sign/trade.) Of course there is always option C. I'd like to see him re-sign here and when/if Lidstrom retires and Holland gets Suter (or Weber via deadline trade(yes I am thinking positive)) he will still be part of the NHL's best defensive corps and help bring one or two more Cups here.... (positive thinking feels good this morning!)
- Greatness=PavelDatsyuk, newfy and Tim.D like this
#27
Posted 13 November 2011 - 06:53 PM
If you hate Hudler, youd hate penner. Thats probably why you got negged. I mean seriously penner is probably just as lazy as Hudler and hes is at less of a disadvantage due to his size.Would the neg bandits kindly explain to me what about this post warranted a -2? You wouldn't want Suter or Weber or Penner or 2 more Stanley Cups? Would you rather lose Stuart for nothing? So it wouldn't be a good idea to trade him before he leaves or sign/trade him if his heart is in LA? Do you hate Stuart so much that the mere idea of someone mentioned re-sign him makes you sick? Don't just neg someone, be a man and step up and explain the reason you disagree, instead of hiding...
And as for Stewie leaving 2 words Ryan Suter. If hes available i dont see holland passing him up if he can get him.
lets say lids come back next year and we get suter
Lids-White
Suter-Kronwall (let them build chemistry now for when we do lose Lids)
Ericisson-Smith-Kindl
#28
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:02 PM
Maybe I should say, "When/if Lids retires our defense will suck, screw Stuart let him walk for nothing, he sucks and nah, there is no chance in hell we land Suter or Weber so f*** being positive about it!" Now that post would warrant a -50 if I wrote it that way, but I guess that is what I really meant when I said positive things about Stuart and getting Suter/Weber and winning Stanley Cups.
And to you above, if Lidstrom stays, I don't think Holland will go after Suter or Weber. I hope to be wrong, tho.
#29
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:17 PM
Then he can be with his family in California and we can get a pick for the future, plus an enforcer who the ladies love.
Everyone goes home happy
Edited by GMRwings1983, 13 November 2011 - 08:17 PM.
- Detroit # 1 Fan, 55fan, Kage5691 and 1 other like this
#30
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:27 PM
That would make sense. Where would we fit him in, though? Parros is out for like a month with a torn retina. Took a puck to the face in practice. Doubt he'll come back with a visor on. Anaheim has a lot of younger, quicker guys coming up in the system. Not sure if the Ducks will reserve a spot for an enforcer, or not.Stuart for Parros and a pick.
Then he can be with his family in California and we can get a pick for the future, plus an enforcer who the ladies love.
Everyone goes home happy
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#31
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:29 PM
That would make sense. Where would we fit him in, though? Parros is out for like a month with a torn retina. Took a puck to the face in practice. Doubt he'll come back with a visor on. Anaheim has a lot of younger, quicker guys coming up in the system. Not sure if the Ducks will reserve a spot for an enforcer, or not.
You missed the part about the pick as well. Stuart could pull a draft pick.
Parros could fit on our 4th line. We don't have Hall of Famers on that line last I checked.
Edited by GMRwings1983, 13 November 2011 - 08:29 PM.
#32
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:33 PM
True. Lubomir Visnovsky is out for a month. Anaheim's defense is awful thin, right now, so that makes a lot of sense.You missed the part about the pick as well. Stuart could pull a draft pick.
Parros could fit on our 4th line. We don't have Hall of Famers on that line last I checked.
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#33
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:37 PM
- Frozen-Man likes this
All I have to say about Holland and our off-season:
and finally
Holland is a damn good GM. period.
#34
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:44 PM
True. Lubomir Visnovsky is out for a month. Anaheim's defense is awful thin, right now, so that makes a lot of sense.
Well, it's all settled then.
Let's send this post to Holland for final approval.
#35
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:56 PM
Just title it "Powerplay as our enforcer", otherwise it goes right to the garbage.Well, it's all settled then.
Let's send this post to Holland for final approval.
- Detroit # 1 Fan, 55fan and GMRwings1983 like this
RIP Bob Probert
RIP Wade Belak
RIP Derek Boogaard
RIP Rick Rypien
#36
Posted 13 November 2011 - 08:58 PM
I hope we can resign him he has been great here I think he is(my opinion) 2nd best defense man we havefrom det news today .. damn don't wanna lose him, guess his family is still out in Cali?
Stuart lights lamp for family
After stating publicly this week that considerations of living closer to home will figure prominently in his decision to re-sign with the Red Wings for next season and beyond, Brad Stuart scored his first goal of the season Saturday.
From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/a...m#ixzz1daf0aV43
"Holmstrom gets more attention around the net than a pretty girl around closing time!" Mickey Redmond
#37
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:07 PM
Aside from being younger, I don't see Gleason as much of an upgrade. Pretty similar players IMO. Really, aside from Suter I don't think any pending UFAs are a real upgrade. There's a handful of guys of a similar level, so I don't think it's a huge worry if we don't re-sign him, especially if Nick comes back again.Well by stay at home, tough defenseman standards he is one of the best.
5th in the league in hits last year, more blocked shots than any wing last season,logs 21 minutes a night 3 mins of which is short handed. Hes one of the most solid stay at home types in the league and was a good enough for the silver medal winning olympic hockey team.
Hes a pretty big upgrade over Stuart, he does everything he does plus fights and is 4 years younger.
As for the Michigan thing, we're talking about a guy who is leaving the most successful franchise of the last 20 years to be near his family most likely, and you dont think being from Michigan could have an effect?
The face of American hockey who had played for one organization for his whole career signed a one year with Detroit because its where hes from and tarnished a great legacy in many people's eyes.
Being from the area has a huge effect for a lot of players its pretty obvious, its obviously a big deal to be near their families and where they grew up
Gleason would be a good replacement. Suter obviously. I also like Boychuk, Gorges, Beauchemin, and Zanon. I also like Wideman. Not a physical, stay-at-home guy, but in our system his puck moving and offense might actually produce better results. Plus, if Nick came back that would give us two excellent L/R pairs for the PP points.
#38
Posted 13 November 2011 - 09:07 PM
- Wings_Rule_1010 likes this
"All done? Five bucks." - Pavel Datsyuk after an interview
"Very few cities in the NHL have the history or the following of the Detroit Red Wings." - Steve Yzerman
"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence." - George Washington
"Suck my machine gun." - Ted Nugent responding to British pansy Piers Morgan whining for gun control
US Bill of non-rights
#39
Posted 13 November 2011 - 10:03 PM
I didnt realize Boychuk was a free agent either.Aside from being younger, I don't see Gleason as much of an upgrade. Pretty similar players IMO. Really, aside from Suter I don't think any pending UFAs are a real upgrade. There's a handful of guys of a similar level, so I don't think it's a huge worry if we don't re-sign him, especially if Nick comes back again.
Gleason would be a good replacement. Suter obviously. I also like Boychuk, Gorges, Beauchemin, and Zanon. I also like Wideman. Not a physical, stay-at-home guy, but in our system his puck moving and offense might actually produce better results. Plus, if Nick came back that would give us two excellent L/R pairs for the PP points.
While Gleason isnt a big upgrade I still think he is one. Hes meaner, more physical and better in his own zone a bit while being younger. Hes not a lot better but I think he is, coupled with his age thats an upgrade nonetheless.
Boychuk would be a good second option and might even be a bit cheaper too.
If Stuarts gone and the wings signa wideman type to replace him, he will be sorely missed. Hes the only bigger, tough dman on the team that can play mean hockey and regular minutes.
RIP BOB PROBERT #24
#40
Posted 14 November 2011 - 10:06 AM
The only problem I have with the post is trading for Penner. I thought this guy was going to be an awesome power forward based on his time in Anaheim, but man was I wrong.Would the neg bandits kindly explain to me what about this post warranted a -2? You wouldn't want Suter or Weber or Penner or 2 more Stanley Cups? Would you rather lose Stuart for nothing? So it wouldn't be a good idea to trade him before he leaves or sign/trade him if his heart is in LA? Do you hate Stuart so much that the mere idea of someone mentioned re-sign him makes you sick? Don't just neg someone, be a man and step up and explain the reason you disagree, instead of hiding...
We already have a player like him in Bertuzzi. But Bert actually tries harder. Penner has been demoted to the third and fourth line several times in his short time in LA.
And the Kings don't really need a defenseman like Stuart with Willie Mitchell, Matt Greene, and even Doughty to a degree, all of whom are physical and hard hitting defenseman.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Babcock confident Datsyuk will stay. Plans to extend this summer
|
General Discussion | DatsyukPwnz13 |
|
|
|
Anyone in the GTA going to either home playoff game? |
General Discussion | wingsfan_54 |
|
|
|
Tatar frustrated; says he will only play in NHL when contract done |
General Discussion | evilzyme |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














