Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Kronwall IS a #1 Dman


  • Please log in to reply
56 replies to this topic

#1 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    Part 3: Return of the Hammer Hands

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,199 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 17 January 2013 - 08:49 AM

Living in the shadows of Nick Lidstrom would make any other Dman on a team appear less worthy. Take away Lids and we have Kronwall whom despite the fact that we've been so spoiled with Lids, is a #1 D. Putting up 40-50ish points on the 2nd pairing is no accident. The only reason he wasn't on the first pairing with Lids was to spread the wealth. If anyone here is under the impression that Kronner won't be a legit #1 guy, his play this year will undoubtedly speak for itself. People are sceaming for the likes of Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo etc, but Kronwall is every bit as valuable as all of them. Wait for his name to be in Norris talks and everyone will be on board.

"I play hockey, but I am not very good.  Can someone please tell me what it would take to sign with the Wings ? I can use a million or two."  ~ arag

 

Dan Cleary is an Xbox 360.  While good for a while, it's time for the new generation to take over.


#2 GoalieManPat

GoalieManPat

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,364 posts
  • Location:Swartz Creek, MI

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:16 AM

I agree that Kronwall is a #1 dman. Hes just not the quality of #1 dman we have been spoiled with for 20 years. The problem is the wings dont have a dominate #2.



#3 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,920 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:35 AM

Sorry but I disagree:

 

Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.

 

 


kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#4 GoalieManPat

GoalieManPat

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,364 posts
  • Location:Swartz Creek, MI

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:39 AM

Sorry but I disagree:

 

Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.

 

Theres a difference between elite and good #1 defenders. You can be a good #1 and not be elite. There are only going to be 4-5 "elite" defenders playing in the league. Does than mean that 25 other teams dont have legitimate #1 defenders? 



#5 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,920 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:47 AM

Theres a difference between elite and good #1 defenders. You can be a good #1 and not be elite. There are only going to be 4-5 "elite" defenders playing in the league. Does than mean that 25 other teams dont have legitimate #1 defenders? 

 

Well the mentioned players are clearly in another league note elite, but how about Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith? I think he is better than Kronwall, for sure not elite but a "real" top pairing guy.


Edited by frankgrimes, 17 January 2013 - 09:47 AM.

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#6 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,744 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:54 AM

A player like Lidstrom comes around every 90 years or so.  He was just that good.

 

Kronwall is a legit #1 Dman and I think he is an elite defenseman because of his hitting power, shot, and so on.  Is Weber better?  I think Weber's shot is better, but he doesn't have the open ice hitting power of Kronwall.  Still, Kronwall is an elite defenseman for sure.


Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#7 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,920 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:58 AM

A player like Lidstrom comes around every 90 years or so.  He was just that good.

 

Kronwall is a legit #1 Dman and I think he is an elite defenseman because of his hitting power, shot, and so on.  Is Weber better?  I think Weber's shot is better, but he doesn't have the open ice hitting power of Kronwall.  Still, Kronwall is an elite defenseman for sure.

 

Weber, Shea Weber ? Although I don't like him the guy is a beast on skates, with Lidström and soon Chara gone he is destinated for a few Norris trophies although Suter has covered up a lot of his mistakes, so he could be the offensive force we saw last season.

 

Weber can fight may not be an enforcer but he can definately fight, would have loved seeing us getting John Scott and invite Weber to dance, doubt  he would have accepted.

 

This season will show us if Kronwall is a #1 so let's enjoy the ride., go Wings.


Edited by frankgrimes, 17 January 2013 - 10:00 AM.

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#8 GoalieManPat

GoalieManPat

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,364 posts
  • Location:Swartz Creek, MI

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:05 AM

I dont know about Weber. The guy is huge and his shot is devastating but I feel having Suter with him allowed him to look a lot better than he really is. Im not saying hes a scrub but by himself I dont see a Norris worthy defender. Im thinking this could be his worst season in a while. Just my opinion though. Im just as likely to be completely wrong. 



#9 RyanBarnes!

RyanBarnes!

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,939 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:16 AM

Agreed. This should be the year for Kronwall. He is definetely capable #1.
"Joey (Kocur) has no fear" -Lyndon Byers
"Empty-net goals are for homos" -Al Iafrate

#10 Drake_Marcus

Drake_Marcus

    Pariah

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,336 posts
  • Location:Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:18 AM

Sorry but I disagree:

 

Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.

 

Pietrangelo on the same level as Weber, Suter and Letang...?  Really?  He's had two damn fine seasons in two years but I don't think it's fair to put him on that level just yet... if his play holds up this season (and it likely will) we can talk.  In the mean time I'd say he's justa hair below the very top teir in this league.



I dont know about Weber. The guy is huge and his shot is devastating but I feel having Suter with him allowed him to look a lot better than he really is. Im not saying hes a scrub but by himself I dont see a Norris worthy defender. Im thinking this could be his worst season in a while. Just my opinion though. Im just as likely to be completely wrong. 

 

Ehhhh... Weber's a better defensive player than the guy who won the Norris this past season.


Dedicated to lulz once lost:
Posted Image
Thanks TeeMan!

"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft

#11 Motown4013

Motown4013

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,067 posts
  • Location:Ontario

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:23 AM

Some people rise to the occasion when the "number 1" is out. Malkin is a very good player when Crosby is in line up- he is the BEST offensive hockey player in the world when he is out of it. Krons and Nick played such different games that Kronwall has never really been given a chance to show off what he can do. We will soon find out but I think Kronwall is ready!


Raising another Red Wings Fan!

The future looks bright in Hockeytown!
GUSTAV SNIPEQUIST!

#12 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,476 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:24 AM

Am I the only one that finds it a little weird that Kronwall is 32 years old?  I guess him really breaking into the roster at 25 or 26 makes me think he's younger than he is.

 

I think we'll find out how good Kronwall really is this year.  Part of the problem I see is not that he can't replace Lidstrom (prime Lidstrom anyway), we know that, but even if he is a legit, elite, #1 Dman, we had that for 20 years + at least 2 or 3 other really good Dmen.  Not sure that is the case now.  We'll see.

 

On Weber, I think this season may show a lot as well.  Some think he might struggle, but I've seen others thinking he may have a career year.  I've seen him picked by a lot of analysts as the Norris winner this year.



#13 gowingsgo

gowingsgo

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,793 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:30 AM

There is no conceivable way to compare anyone in the entire league or on our roster to Lidstrom. He was a god among men on the ice.

 

Kronwall & Ericsson both could be #1 d men. But no one in the entire league is on par with Lidstrom back there. 


NHL Playoffs = Mule Season. Lets Go Wings

#14 toby91_ca

toby91_ca

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 8,476 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:36 AM

Sorry but I disagree:

 

Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.

I've almost thought of Kronwall and Letang as being at a similar level (not similar style).  Maybe Letang a bit higher, but not much.  I think Letang really started to breakout last year, but then he got hurt.  We'll see where he's at now.  He's much cheaper than Kronwall.  I guess the other big difference is that he is more than 6 years younger, so he's likely to improve.



There is no conceivable way to compare anyone in the entire league or on our roster to Lidstrom. He was a god among men on the ice.

 

Kronwall & Ericsson both could be #1 d men. But no one in the entire league is on par with Lidstrom back there. 

I think people get caught up a bit in that, but you have to think about LIdstrom as the guy playing his last year of his career....that's a bit easier to replace than Lidstrom in his prime.



#15 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,249 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:43 AM

I've almost thought of Kronwall and Letang as being at a similar level (not similar style).  Maybe Letang a bit higher, but not much.  I think Letang really started to breakout last year, but then he got hurt.  We'll see where he's at now.  He's much cheaper than Kronwall.  I guess the other big difference is that he is more than 6 years younger, so he's likely to improve.

I think people get caught up a bit in that, but you have to think about LIdstrom as the guy playing his last year of his career....that's a bit easier to replace than Lidstrom in his prime.

 

A bit easier? Lidstrom at 40 was better than weber at 26, Chara in his prime, suter, pietrangelo, letang, and so on. The only player in the last 20 years who even compared to him was Vladdy, and unfortunately negligence stole him from us. no one can replace lids, not in his prime, not at 40, not ever.



#16 dat's sick

dat's sick

    Fear can hold you prisoner, hope can set you free

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,335 posts
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:47 AM

I've always been a believer that Kronwall can become one of the best d-men in the league. He has all the tools. And at times he has been that guy, the offensively skilled, hard-hitting and defensively sound guy. His major problem as I see it has been consistency, and part of that has been due to injuries. With Lids gone he needs to find that high-level of consistent play and hopefully stay healthy. Overall I think our D will do the job this year. I have faith in Smith, I think Ericsson has started to become very solid, and all we need is for either Colo or Kindl to not completely suck ass and we're fine, or atleast good enough.

#17 fat guy in a maltby jersey

fat guy in a maltby jersey

    3rd Line Checker

  • Restricted
  • PipPip
  • 366 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:54 AM

The only player in the last 20 years who even compared to him was Vladdy

seriously? lol

#18 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:08 AM

First of all, Pronger and Chara are the ONLY defensemen that should even be mentioned in the same breath as Lidstrom. Letang? Gimme a break. Lids was the best of the best.

Kronwall will do well this year.

#19 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,249 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:21 AM

seriously? lol

 

 

First of all, Pronger and Chara are the ONLY defensemen that should even be mentioned in the same breath as Lidstrom. Letang? Gimme a break. Lids was the best of the best.

Kronwall will do well this year.

 

Yes seriously, Konstantinov was almost as good, if not just as good as Lidstrom. He played differently but he was certainly elite. and chara and pronger aren't nearly as good either. I mentioned Letang only because someone else had mentioned Letang



#20 The Axe

The Axe

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,379 posts

Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:27 AM

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Euro_Twins" data-cid="2340882" data-time="1358439671"><p>
 <br />
 <br />
 <br />
Yes seriously, Konstantinov was almost as good, if not just as good as Lidstrom. He played differently but he was certainly elite. and chara and pronger aren't nearly as good either. I mentioned Letang only because someone else had mentioned Letang</p></blockquote>


As long as we can agree that comparing Letang to Lidstrom is a fricking joke.





Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users