Kronwall IS a #1 Dman
#1
Posted 17 January 2013 - 08:49 AM
- Hockeymom1960, amato, Marxx71 and 1 other like this
Wings need some Ryan Pulock in the 1st round, a goal scorer in the 2nd round and rounds 3-7 all guys 6'4 or bigger. Please sign Dekeyser to play with Smith. <--Dekeyser signed, Paired next year. Mark your calendars.
Tootoo needs a partner in crime that plays like him on the other side of Helm. Oh hey, we have Mitchell Callahan. Problem solved.
Cleary....
XBox Live BleedRedWing
#2
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:16 AM
I agree that Kronwall is a #1 dman. Hes just not the quality of #1 dman we have been spoiled with for 20 years. The problem is the wings dont have a dominate #2.
#3
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:35 AM
Sorry but I disagree:
Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.

Thank you so much perfect human being #5
Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!
N ational
#4
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:39 AM
Sorry but I disagree:
Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.
Theres a difference between elite and good #1 defenders. You can be a good #1 and not be elite. There are only going to be 4-5 "elite" defenders playing in the league. Does than mean that 25 other teams dont have legitimate #1 defenders?
- Din758 and frankgrimes like this
#5
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:47 AM
Theres a difference between elite and good #1 defenders. You can be a good #1 and not be elite. There are only going to be 4-5 "elite" defenders playing in the league. Does than mean that 25 other teams dont have legitimate #1 defenders?
Well the mentioned players are clearly in another league note elite, but how about Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith? I think he is better than Kronwall, for sure not elite but a "real" top pairing guy.
Edited by frankgrimes, 17 January 2013 - 09:47 AM.
- GoalieManPat likes this

Thank you so much perfect human being #5
Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!
N ational
#6
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:54 AM
A player like Lidstrom comes around every 90 years or so. He was just that good.
Kronwall is a legit #1 Dman and I think he is an elite defenseman because of his hitting power, shot, and so on. Is Weber better? I think Weber's shot is better, but he doesn't have the open ice hitting power of Kronwall. Still, Kronwall is an elite defenseman for sure.
- Hockeymom1960, Z Winged Dangler and Johnz96 like this
My Domain
#7
Posted 17 January 2013 - 09:58 AM
A player like Lidstrom comes around every 90 years or so. He was just that good.
Kronwall is a legit #1 Dman and I think he is an elite defenseman because of his hitting power, shot, and so on. Is Weber better? I think Weber's shot is better, but he doesn't have the open ice hitting power of Kronwall. Still, Kronwall is an elite defenseman for sure.
Weber, Shea Weber ? Although I don't like him the guy is a beast on skates, with Lidström and soon Chara gone he is destinated for a few Norris trophies although Suter has covered up a lot of his mistakes, so he could be the offensive force we saw last season.
Weber can fight may not be an enforcer but he can definately fight, would have loved seeing us getting John Scott and invite Weber to dance, doubt he would have accepted.
This season will show us if Kronwall is a #1 so let's enjoy the ride., go Wings.
Edited by frankgrimes, 17 January 2013 - 10:00 AM.

Thank you so much perfect human being #5
Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!
N ational
#8
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:05 AM
I dont know about Weber. The guy is huge and his shot is devastating but I feel having Suter with him allowed him to look a lot better than he really is. Im not saying hes a scrub but by himself I dont see a Norris worthy defender. Im thinking this could be his worst season in a while. Just my opinion though. Im just as likely to be completely wrong.
#9
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:16 AM
- Motown4013 and Johnz96 like this
"Empty-net goals are for homos" -Al Iafrate
#10
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:18 AM
Sorry but I disagree:
Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.
Pietrangelo on the same level as Weber, Suter and Letang...? Really? He's had two damn fine seasons in two years but I don't think it's fair to put him on that level just yet... if his play holds up this season (and it likely will) we can talk. In the mean time I'd say he's justa hair below the very top teir in this league.
I dont know about Weber. The guy is huge and his shot is devastating but I feel having Suter with him allowed him to look a lot better than he really is. Im not saying hes a scrub but by himself I dont see a Norris worthy defender. Im thinking this could be his worst season in a while. Just my opinion though. Im just as likely to be completely wrong.
Ehhhh... Weber's a better defensive player than the guy who won the Norris this past season.

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#11
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:23 AM
Some people rise to the occasion when the "number 1" is out. Malkin is a very good player when Crosby is in line up- he is the BEST offensive hockey player in the world when he is out of it. Krons and Nick played such different games that Kronwall has never really been given a chance to show off what he can do. We will soon find out but I think Kronwall is ready!
The future looks bright in Hockeytown!
#12
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:24 AM
Am I the only one that finds it a little weird that Kronwall is 32 years old? I guess him really breaking into the roster at 25 or 26 makes me think he's younger than he is.
I think we'll find out how good Kronwall really is this year. Part of the problem I see is not that he can't replace Lidstrom (prime Lidstrom anyway), we know that, but even if he is a legit, elite, #1 Dman, we had that for 20 years + at least 2 or 3 other really good Dmen. Not sure that is the case now. We'll see.
On Weber, I think this season may show a lot as well. Some think he might struggle, but I've seen others thinking he may have a career year. I've seen him picked by a lot of analysts as the Norris winner this year.
#13
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:30 AM
There is no conceivable way to compare anyone in the entire league or on our roster to Lidstrom. He was a god among men on the ice.
Kronwall & Ericsson both could be #1 d men. But no one in the entire league is on par with Lidstrom back there.
- frankgrimes likes this
#14
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:36 AM
Sorry but I disagree:
Weber, Suter, Pietrangelo, Letang are elite. Kronwall is a great second pairing guy just like White but he is not and probably at the age of 30 will never be a number 1. The reason why the Wings urgently need a number 1 defenseman is simple; to create a top and a very solid second pairing, as of now this team doesn't have that.
I've almost thought of Kronwall and Letang as being at a similar level (not similar style). Maybe Letang a bit higher, but not much. I think Letang really started to breakout last year, but then he got hurt. We'll see where he's at now. He's much cheaper than Kronwall. I guess the other big difference is that he is more than 6 years younger, so he's likely to improve.
There is no conceivable way to compare anyone in the entire league or on our roster to Lidstrom. He was a god among men on the ice.
Kronwall & Ericsson both could be #1 d men. But no one in the entire league is on par with Lidstrom back there.
I think people get caught up a bit in that, but you have to think about LIdstrom as the guy playing his last year of his career....that's a bit easier to replace than Lidstrom in his prime.
#15
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:43 AM
I've almost thought of Kronwall and Letang as being at a similar level (not similar style). Maybe Letang a bit higher, but not much. I think Letang really started to breakout last year, but then he got hurt. We'll see where he's at now. He's much cheaper than Kronwall. I guess the other big difference is that he is more than 6 years younger, so he's likely to improve.I think people get caught up a bit in that, but you have to think about LIdstrom as the guy playing his last year of his career....that's a bit easier to replace than Lidstrom in his prime.
A bit easier? Lidstrom at 40 was better than weber at 26, Chara in his prime, suter, pietrangelo, letang, and so on. The only player in the last 20 years who even compared to him was Vladdy, and unfortunately negligence stole him from us. no one can replace lids, not in his prime, not at 40, not ever.
- hockey&beer, IILeiBlazeII and Z Winged Dangler like this
#16
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:47 AM
#17
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:54 AM
The only player in the last 20 years who even compared to him was Vladdy
seriously? lol
#18
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:08 AM
Kronwall will do well this year.
#19
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:21 AM
seriously? lol
First of all, Pronger and Chara are the ONLY defensemen that should even be mentioned in the same breath as Lidstrom. Letang? Gimme a break. Lids was the best of the best.
Kronwall will do well this year.
Yes seriously, Konstantinov was almost as good, if not just as good as Lidstrom. He played differently but he was certainly elite. and chara and pronger aren't nearly as good either. I mentioned Letang only because someone else had mentioned Letang
#20
Posted 17 January 2013 - 11:27 AM
<br />
<br />
<br />
Yes seriously, Konstantinov was almost as good, if not just as good as Lidstrom. He played differently but he was certainly elite. and chara and pronger aren't nearly as good either. I mentioned Letang only because someone else had mentioned Letang</p></blockquote>
As long as we can agree that comparing Letang to Lidstrom is a fricking joke.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSN Feature on Kronwall |
General Discussion | FlashyG |
|
|
|
Detroit Pistons 1987 Playoff runRookies Salley and Rodman |
Other Sports | sonof3m |
|
|
|
Abdelkader suspended 2 games for hit on Lydman |
General Discussion | Dirty Dangle |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














