Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

flyers sign macdonald to 6 year $30 million extension


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,426 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 15 April 2014 - 10:08 AM

Huge overpayment if you ask me, but he did lead the league in blocking shots, I guess that's worth $5 million a year?

http://www.nhl.com/i...s.htm?id=714875

#2 DickieDunn

DickieDunn

    http://redwingsandotherthings.wordpress.com/

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,502 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 15 April 2014 - 10:10 AM

He would have gotten more on the market. $10 says they try to trade him in the next 2 years.

Oh this young man has had a very trying rookie season, with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him, well, I guess that's more than most 21-year-olds can handle... Ogie Ogilthorpe!


#3 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,426 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 15 April 2014 - 10:13 AM

I don't understand how. He is a -22 this year, only has 28 points, and is already 27. What's the upside here he isn't worth that contract

#4 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,149 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 10:30 AM

Little overpaid but not too much for what he brings, physical shot  blocking defenseman who can chip in some points here and there. Would have loved him in a Winged Wheel.

 

Good signing for the Flyers


kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#5 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,972 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 15 April 2014 - 10:54 AM

What, the Flyers overpayed for a hockey player?  YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS!!!!


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#6 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,426 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 15 April 2014 - 11:32 AM

Little overpaid but not too much for what he brings, physical shot  blocking defenseman who can chip in some points here and there. Would have loved him in a Winged Wheel.
 
Good signing for the Flyers


Since when is blocking shots and playing physical worth $5million a year? He isn't great defensively or offensively. He would be a good 2nd pairing guy at 3-3.5/per imo

#7 Crashnburnluder

Crashnburnluder

    Crashnburnluder

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,267 posts
  • Location:Lancater, Pennsylvania

Posted 15 April 2014 - 11:33 AM

Okay, arguing with a ton of my flyers fans who all say Amac > Ericsson.... That includes contract and everything. Also had a couple say he is a solid number 2 in the NHL right now??? Lol please tell me I'm not crazy or that big of a homer...?

#8 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,426 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 15 April 2014 - 11:34 AM

Okay, arguing with a ton of my flyers fans who all say Amac > Ericsson.... That includes contract and everything. Also had a couple say he is a solid number 2 in the NHL right now??? Lol please tell me I'm not crazy or that big of a homer...?


I think Ericsson is better defensively. Either way both are not number 2 nhl defense in the nhl. Flyers fans don't understand what a good defense looks like though so I get it lol.

#9 Crashnburnluder

Crashnburnluder

    Crashnburnluder

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,267 posts
  • Location:Lancater, Pennsylvania

Posted 15 April 2014 - 11:35 AM

I think Ericsson is better defensively. Either way both are not number 2 nhl defense in the nhl. Flyers fans don't understand what a good defense looks like though so I get it lol.


I agree big rig isn't a number 2 but he is a beast 3 shutdown. I have wanted us to get a number 2
D man that could really play with kronwall, kinda like Stuart was.

#10 kipwinger

kipwinger

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,972 posts
  • Location:Mt. Pleasant, MI

Posted 15 April 2014 - 11:47 AM

If MacDonald is worth 5 million dollars as a stay at home defensive d-man then Ericsson is worth fifty millionty zillionty dollars for being the same thing only bigger, strong, and faster. 

 

Macdonald is a good player, don't get me wrong.  But he's basically the Ryan Callahan of defensemen.  A little engine that could. 


GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  

 

Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."

 

"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."

 

 


#11 unsaddleddonald

unsaddleddonald

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 748 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 01:41 PM

Paul Holmgren being Paul Holmgren.

 

It's idiot GMs like him that create salary mismatches like this. He just set the market for the thin UFA d-men this year. I expect Niskanen to make $15M per.



#12 paulwoodsfan

paulwoodsfan

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 173 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 01:58 PM

This is why I always laugh when, every time the Wings re-sign any of their RFA types, letsgowings blows up with "we overpaid!" It happened with Ericsson and Kronwall, and it has happened with others. Invariably those "overpaid" contracts start looking pretty darned good later when other teams pay more for lesser players. Not saying Holland has never made a mistake, obviously, but for most of the in-house guys who would be considered core players, he has locked them up for less than the market soon became.



#13 MabusIncarnate

MabusIncarnate

    The Truth Is Out There

  • Silver Booster Mod
  • 2,226 posts
  • Location:Monteagle, Tennessee

Posted 15 April 2014 - 02:55 PM

I would have thought he would draw $3.5-$4.0, but a solid defensive player that blocked nearly 250 shots this season. 

 

With some of the contracts thrown around these past couple seasons it's hard to even determine anymore what is nuts and what isn't 


13585921555_24551f5658.jpg


#14 DickieDunn

DickieDunn

    http://redwingsandotherthings.wordpress.com/

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,502 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 15 April 2014 - 03:20 PM

The thing with him is, I've seen evaluations saying he's a solid #2, and others that said he's a good 3rd pair guy on a contender, and a lot of his stats are because someone had to play those minutes for the Isles.  Obviously Philly feels the former is true, but this is Philly so who knows if he really is a #2.  But at least they have Timonen coming off the books, so they'll only have 5 active defensemen making over $3.5 mil.  Until they give someone else a big contract that is.


Oh this young man has had a very trying rookie season, with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him, well, I guess that's more than most 21-year-olds can handle... Ogie Ogilthorpe!


#15 DSM

DSM

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 650 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 03:28 PM

In reality, it's probably exactly what he would've gotten on the open market on July 1st.

Looks like Holmgren is trying to plan ahead for the likely retirement of Timonen, instead of waiting for July 1st to come around.

This summers UFA class is super thin on proven big-minute dmen that are not yet on the backslide of their careers. MacDonald and Niskanen were probably going to be the most sought after.

Niskanens agent is probably doing cart wheels right now...

Edited by DSM, 15 April 2014 - 03:29 PM.


#16 Nightfall

Nightfall

    My goal is to deny yours!

  • Gold Booster
  • 3,752 posts
  • Location:Grand Rapids

Posted 15 April 2014 - 03:29 PM

Considering the Flyers wanted to sign Cleary for 3 years and 8.25 million, I am not surprised anymore at what the Flyers do when it comes to signing players.

 

http://www.broadstre...contract-flyers


Christopher Brian Dudek
My Domain

#17 wings4thecup06

wings4thecup06

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 928 posts
  • Location:London, United Kingdom

Posted 15 April 2014 - 04:54 PM

Prime example of why we're going to see another lockout once this CBA expires. It's contracts like this, due to stupid GMs and owners and agents, that drive salaries up across the board. It's really F****** infuriating and defeats the entire purpose of having a salary cap. And it's so flawed. Seriously why the hell would you link the cap to revenue if you're the owners, knowing that the game is increasing it's revenues. It's just like shooting yourself in the foot because those rollbacks on salaries they keep wanting eventually get surpassed by the cap. Argh. Rant over.

 

back to Macdonald. I don't think 1 or 2 good years should earn him $5m, but yes, now Holmgren has gone and set the table for the rest of D men who will hit the market in two months time. What a jackass. 


temp 1

 


#18 frankgrimes

frankgrimes

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,149 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 05:22 PM

Wheter people like or not Amac would have gotten the same if not more on the open market Holmer knew it. You aren't going to get a young top pairing defenseman under 7 mill anymore thanks to the stupid CBA so why shouldn't second pairing guys cash in for giving their bodies to the team? At some point people have to understand the time for giving hometown discounts is gone and the owners brought it to themselves by employing a midget and locking out the players 3 times in a row. So instead of bitching about the deal why not grats Amac? He finally gets to play for an organization which will spend to the cap instead of lowballing their players. Also there is no purpose in having a hard cap, if leagues want a cap it should be MLB like.

Edited by frankgrimes, 15 April 2014 - 05:24 PM.

kftx.jpg

 

The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..


#19 dirtydangles

dirtydangles

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,796 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 05:30 PM

Flat out overpayment. 4 mill should have been his ceiling. Philly is desperate for Dmen though so I guess they did what they had to do. Anyone remember the Carle contract in Tampa a while back? This reminds me of that. 


Is there a kickstarter campaign for Jakub Kindl to never play another NHL game?


#20 unsaddleddonald

unsaddleddonald

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 748 posts

Posted 15 April 2014 - 05:32 PM

Wheter people like or not Amac would have gotten the same if not more on the open market Holmer knew it. You aren't going to get a young top pairing defenseman under 7 mill anymore thanks to the stupid CBA so why shouldn't second pairing guys cash in for giving their bodies to the team? At some point people have to understand the time for giving hometown discounts is gone and the owners brought it to themselves by employing a midget and locking out the players 3 times in a row. So instead of bitching about the deal why not grats Amac? He finally gets to play for an organization which will spend to the cap instead of lowballing their players. Also there is no purpose in having a hard cap, if leagues want a cap it should be MLB like.

 

We're annoyed because it is guys like Paul Holmgren who have created this "reality". Throwing money at guys who don't deserve it.

 

I don't care who you play for, a d-man worth $5M per doesn't finish -22 and 28 points. Every defenseman should be judge on a Nick Lidstrom scale. How much did the best d-man of the generation make in his last year? $6M?







Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users