• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
kliq

Would you bring back Babcock?

Rate this topic

Would you bring back Babcock?  

51 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Long Read: Kindl Discusses His Career (Babs stories included)

Somewhat interesting back story. His mother died when he was young, but already playing hockey at a junior level, and he basically dealt with her death by ignoring it completely and putting all his focus and energy into hockey. He did the same with school, and says he basically received no real education, because he didn't go to school. Just gym and hockey.

On his draft:

Quote

The Red Wings were the only club that I didn't talk to during the physical tests. I later asked general manager Ken Holland about it, and he told me that they didn't need to find out anything from me. They knew exactly what kind of player I was.

Holland and his team never bothered to interview him....

On first meeting the team:

Quote

Shanahan walked around us and introduced himself, shaking hands with all of us. Everyone was thrilled. Only Robin Big Snake, a fighter, told him, "Dude, I know who you are. You don't have to introduce yourself to me."

Robin with the BIG Snake

On his expectations as a young player and Holland's over-ripening:

Quote

That's what Detroit is famous for. They don't rush anything. Although I left disappointed, it was great in Kitchener again. “It'll work out next time,” I thought.

I believed that I would be the new Nick Lidström, that I would gradually take over after him. Accordingly, I thought about my importance to the Red Wings, but so far, at the age of 20, they hadn't given me the slightest chance, which grounded me.

In Grand Rapids, I couldn't even get up from that ground for a long time. I realized how difficult it would be for me to switch to adult hockey. I failed the switch. I failed in this first season, where I barely played compared to what I was used to from juniors. I had the worst plus-minus statistic in the league. Minus thirty-four.

It was so bad that I considered returning to Czech. Me, the hero, drafted in the first round by Detroit. I had always envisioned jumping from the junior league to the NHL and immediately becoming a star. Instead, I had trouble playing for the farm team.

On becoming a defensive player:

Quote

I improved in my second season. I finished minus-14. I felt like I was becoming a different hockey player. As a junior, I used to do whatever I wanted on power plays and just attacked, but Detroit’s strategy was based on something completely different. They wanted me to use my skills, but first they needed to make me into a player who would fit into the team’s defensive concept.

I didn't understand it for a long time, and when the management came to see me, I wanted to show them my individual skills. I thought that I always needed to be on the puck and skate here and there, and that they would like it. But they told me, "No. We know you can do this, and how you shoot and play. But we are interested in how you play without a puck, how you position yourself, how you defend, how you do not let the opponent into the goal crease, and how you do not lose a duel in the corner."

It was hard for me to realize that hockey in the NHL, especially for a defenseman, is not about productivity, but about details. If you don't have them at a certain level, no one will keep you in the league for a long time. Although I played in the AHL All-Star game, it didn't mean I was ready for the Red Wings.

On Babcocks positives:

Quote

We were also coached by Mike Babcock. As a human being, I can think of him whatever I want, but his emphasis on every detail that makes players better is the reason why as a coach he is so valued. Whether we won or lost, the next day, he had prepared a five-minute analysis of things that we should improve upon, and we would continue to focus on those. He had a different preparation for each game; a detailed strategy for every team in the league.

He taught me how to keep my opponent from the front of the goal, how to stop him from going into a corner, and how to move without a puck. I didn't really know any of these things before, and I never needed to.

On Babcocks negatives:

Quote

Even when I was drafted, Babcock asked the scouts what kind of player I was.

"Something like Martin Škoula from Colorado," they said.

"Oh, Jesus," was his reaction.

I wasn't his favorite player from the beginning, and even though Holland liked me, Babcock seemed to constantly test what I could handle and he let me know that he didn’t like me as a player. I couldn’t stand him as a person.

I saw him making jokes with the others, but with me he barely exchanged a few words. If he did, it was to humiliate me. For example, he once put me on the right side of the defense, and I was looking at the lineup in disbelief. He was just passing by and heard me, so he looked at the lineup and said, "Yeah, you're on the right side. You have trouble playing on the left, and I'm making it harder for you, right?"

He seldomly trusted me on the ice. My teammates also wondered what the issue was, because even when I didn't play for a long time, I immediately was among the best when he gave me a chance. Then he let me sit again. Sometimes, I didn’t play a single game for two months, then I jumped in, played well, scored a goal and an assist, for example, and then didn’t play the next game again.

On leaving Detroit:

Quote

I should have left earlier; I know that today -- before I got the label of someone who was always ready to replace someone in the lineup. I let everything go too far, but I still believed that I would be the new Lidström one day; that I would stay in a single organization from the age of 18 and gradually become the defensive star there.

 

If you read the entire thing, In general, Kindl highlights all his shortcomings but then seems to give off the impression that he doesn't understand why he "never got a real shot to play". And that had Detroit or Florida just thrust him into the #1 role he would've been great. I think he might be a Dumbass. 

Edited by bIueadams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Lot's of weird looking quotes here wha?

9 minutes ago, bIueadams said:

If you read the entire thing, In general, Kindl highlights all his shortcomings but then seems to give off the impression that he doesn't understand why he "never got a real shot to play". And that had Detroit or Florida just thrust him into the #1 role he would've been great. I think he might be a Dumbass. 

Yeah I'm with Babcock on this one. 

Jurco and Smith got the same Bab-scythe too.

All this gives me new respect for guys like Hudler. Like how did he even live through Babcock? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The 91 of Ryans said:

^ Lot's of weird looking quotes here wha?

Yeah I'm with Babcock on this one. 

Jurco and Smith got the same Bab-scythe too.

All this gives me new respect for guys like Hudler. Like how did he even live through Babcock? 

 

Yeah the formatting on the article fuqqed up my copy paste job.

I'd say because Hudler actually had some talent. Babs can be a bad person all day, but he's not a dumb hockey brain. Even his haters say he's tactically above average. Kindl thought he was being treated unfairly because he thought he was the new Lidstrom and wasn't being respected for it. Babs was "laughing and joking" with other players because those players actually mattered to him. Kindl did not.

I don't mean this as a defense of Babs - but can you imagine being a coach and having to deal with every Kindl, Smith, Jurco, R-slur coming to your team and thinking theyre the next big sheit. In a way you do have to knock them down a peg and bring their expectations back to earth. 

I dont think anyone under Babs didn't get a shot because he didn't like them. They didn't get a shot because they were bad. Look at Nyquist and Franzen - both of whom apparently hated him and he hated them - but he played them - cause they aint sheit like you Kindl. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, bIueadams said:

Yeah the formatting on the article fuqqed up my copy paste job.

I'd say because Hudler actually had some talent. Babs can be a bad person all day, but he's not a dumb hockey brain. Even his haters say he's tactically above average. Kindl thought he was being treated unfairly because he thought he was the new Lidstrom and wasn't being respected for it. Babs was "laughing and joking" with other players because those players actually mattered to him. Kindl did not.

I don't mean this as a defense of Babs - but can you imagine being a coach and having to deal with every Kindl, Smith, Jurco, R-slur coming to your team and thinking theyre the next big sheit. In a way you do have to knock them down a peg and bring their expectations back to earth. 

I dont think anyone under Babs didn't get a shot because he didn't like them. They didn't get a shot because they were bad. Look at Nyquist and Franzen - both of whom apparently hated him and he hated them - but he played them - cause they aint sheit like you Kindl. 

I bet Babcock had a good time scrolling through Hudler's summer vacation photos on his 1st generation iPhone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The 91 of Ryans said:

Pretty good impression ^^

Here's the real version

PSYCHO

What was psycho about it? Honestly asking. I don't see anything alarming, but maybe I have a thick skin.

More than a few of you will disagree with me, but I maintain, Mike Babcock is probably one of the best hockey coaches of this generation. And he's also probably one of the meanest/toxic/cruelest. You could probably say the same thing about Bowman - but nobody was sensitive to it back then like they are now. 

IMO Babcock is the coach version of Holland. Give Holland superstars and he will successfully manage a team for years. Take them away and he drowns. Give Babcock Datsyuks, Zbergs, and Lidstroms, and he will thrive. Give him Franzens, Nyquists, Marners, and Fantillis, and he drowns. It's common knowledge at this point that he was hard on young players and treated vets with respect. Honestly he was built for the late Wings and no one else. Maybe last years Bruins???

Edited by bIueadams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, bIueadams said:

What was psycho about it? Honestly asking. I don't see anything alarming, but maybe I have a thick skin.

More than a few of you will disagree with me, but I maintain, Mike Babcock is probably one of the best hockey coaches of this generation. And he's also probably one of the meanest/toxic/cruelest. You could probably say the same thing about Bowman - but nobody was sensitive to it back then like they are now. 

IMO Babcock is the coach version of Holland. Give Holland superstars and he will successfully manage a team for years. Take them away and he drowns. Give Babcock Datsyuks, Zbergs, and Lidstroms, and he will thrive. Give him Franzens, Nyquists, Marners, and Fantillis, and he drowns. It's common knowledge at this point that he was hard on young players and treated vets with respect. Honestly he was built for the late Wings and no one else. Maybe last years Bruins???

I'm mostly just vibing I guess but he just seems tone deaf. Equating being a constant prik across three NHL organizations to saying a whoopsie to your wife lol 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/28/2023 at 1:32 AM, bIueadams said:

What was psycho about it? Honestly asking. I don't see anything alarming, but maybe I have a thick skin.

More than a few of you will disagree with me, but I maintain, Mike Babcock is probably one of the best hockey coaches of this generation. And he's also probably one of the meanest/toxic/cruelest. You could probably say the same thing about Bowman - but nobody was sensitive to it back then like they are now. 

IMO Babcock is the coach version of Holland. Give Holland superstars and he will successfully manage a team for years. Take them away and he drowns. Give Babcock Datsyuks, Zbergs, and Lidstroms, and he will thrive. Give him Franzens, Nyquists, Marners, and Fantillis, and he drowns. It's common knowledge at this point that he was hard on young players and treated vets with respect. Honestly he was built for the late Wings and no one else. Maybe last years Bruins???

Very fair point, especially based on Det & TO. Just to play devils advocate, he did take the 03 Ducks within 1 game of winning a cup with what I believe was a very young team, Oates and Stumpy being the exceptions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, kliq said:

Very fair point, especially based on Det & TO. Just to play devils advocate, he did take the 03 Ducks within 1 game of winning a cup with what I believe was a very young team, Oates and Stumpy being the exceptions. 

Thank you, I'm locked in here with a buncha insane individuals. I tell them Seider rules and Zadina sucks and that takes them like 3+ years to recognize these obvious facts. They're now jousting at me again because Eddogg sucks - learning absolutely nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bIueadams said:

Thank you, I'm locked in here with a buncha insane individuals. I tell them Seider rules and Zadina sucks and that takes them like 3+ years to recognize these obvious facts. They're now jousting at me again because Eddogg sucks - learning absolutely nothing.

on JoMomma's clit maybe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this