alienanxiety 23 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I'm not sure how, but I am convinced the NHL fixes or slants the playoffs. Either that or it is an incredible fluke that the last three seasons have seen bad market "Bettman teams" win the Stanley Cup over a Canadian team. It just seems to "perfect" for me. So I guess next year we will see the Atlanta Thrashers defeat the Vancouver Canucks in the finals? Or maybe San Jose will finally make the next step and defeat the Montreal Canadians for the coveted prize. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeytown0001 7,652 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 (edited) I don't think I'd go as far as to say that the whole thing is fixed (although I know we all had a few choice words to say about the officiating). The whole point of the salary cap was to make it so teams like Detroit, Colorado, New Jersey, ect. would stop completely dominating the league and give teams like Nashville, Florida, Atlanta, Phoenix, ect. a chance to compete for the Cup. What Bettman doesn't seem to realize is that most people in those cities couldn't care less about hockey. Look at the ratings for the last 3 Cup Finals. It's because teams like Tampa, Carolina, and Anaheim are in the Finals, and nobody cares. He'd have a bigger audience if it was Detroit or another team like that. Or who knows, maybe it was a big screw-you to the real fans of the league. Edited June 1, 2007 by Hockeytown0001 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tommie2 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I don't think I'd go as far as to say that the whole thing is fixed (although I know we all had a few choice words to say about the officiating). The whole point of the salary cap was to make it so teams like Detroit, Colorado, New Jersey, ect. would stop completely dominating the league and give teams like Nashville, Florida, Atlanta, Phoenix, ect. a chance to compete for the Cup. What Bettman doesn't seem to realize is that most people in those cities couldn't care less about hockey. Look at the ratings for the last 3 Cup Finals. It's because teams like Tampa, Carolina, and Anaheim are in the Finals, and nobody cares. He'd have a bigger audience if it was Detroit or another team like that. Or who knows, maybe it was a big screw-you to the real fans of the league. yes even you a big canadian team like toranto or montreal you would get a better fan bace watching the games.Or even with more scoreing you could get a bigger audinence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
glasgowcelticwing 18 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I wouldn't say it's fixed . they may favour the newer team's alittle to make them more popular , but I wouldn't go as far to say that they would cheat to get their newer market team's to win the Cup . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bad Vlad Forever 1 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I hear that Anaheim corks their sticks and use pine tar on their friction tape!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Fan_In_Exile 3 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 In all seriousness I wonder what the ratings would be if there were a Cup Finals between our beloved Red Wings, & the Maple Leafs...Would any non-hockey fan, or someone who's a fan of hockey, but of neither team take notice of the Original 6 showdown? Man would that be awesome! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I hear that Anaheim corks their sticks and use pine tar on their friction tape!!!! They just better recover all the sticks they break...and quickly after it happens. The PO's being fixed might explain the lack of the Wings PP to notch much needed and timely goals in the final round... I'll buy into that logic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HuntsVegas Baby 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 What do you think this is the NBA? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladdy16 2,154 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 What do you think this is the NBA? Why not? Bettman sure does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lfd250 1 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I doubt it's fixed, or Detroit would be in. 2007 Game one Rating 0.72 523,000 2002 Game One Rating 2.85 2,467,173 2007 Game one in LA area 1.7 95,000 2002 Game one in Det area 42.8 unknown amount Did I see an article calling LA hockeytown?????? http://espn.go.com/nhl/playoffs2002/s/2002/0606/1391788.html http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/artic...0458/1128/rss16 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HockeyCrazy3033 168 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 If it was fixed, you'd see a Red Wings/ Toronto finals showdown. Surely if they wanted to fix it they'd have the teams in that get the highest ratings and are the most popular. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bullocks Report post Posted June 1, 2007 yes it's definitely fixed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canadienhater 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I'm not sure how, but I am convinced the NHL fixes or slants the playoffs. Either that or it is an incredible fluke that the last three seasons have seen bad market "Bettman teams" win the Stanley Cup over a Canadian team. It just seems to "perfect" for me. So I guess next year we will see the Atlanta Thrashers defeat the Vancouver Canucks in the finals? Or maybe San Jose will finally make the next step and defeat the Montreal Canadians for the coveted prize. wrong league ever watch the nba Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HockeyCrazy3033 168 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 (edited) yes it's definitely fixed Haha I know right. I don't even see how hockey being fixed is possible. Can you imagine a coach to his players. "Hey..if any of you guys get like an odd man rush..or a breakaway...just try and shoot wide, or go in with a weak shot. They are paying us to lose..and well money is more important than winning!." Edited June 1, 2007 by HockeyCrazy3033 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canadienhater 0 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I'm not sure how, but I am convinced the NHL fixes or slants the playoffs. Either that or it is an incredible fluke that the last three seasons have seen bad market "Bettman teams" win the Stanley Cup over a Canadian team. It just seems to "perfect" for me. So I guess next year we will see the Atlanta Thrashers defeat the Vancouver Canucks in the finals? Or maybe San Jose will finally make the next step and defeat the Montreal Canadians for the coveted prize. do you really think that little rat bastard bettman is smart enough to do that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kp-Wings 3 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I love stuff like this. The general public really tries to find any excuses they can. If it were fixed, do you honestly think that the NHL would have chosen a matchup like Anaheim vs. Ottawa? A matchup with no history in it all? Come on now. If the NHL wanted ratings, which I'm sure it does, and decided to fix the the playoffs, then pretty much all finals possibilites would feature Original 6 teams. We'd see more stuff like Detroit vs. Toronto, Detroit vs. New York, Chicago vs. Toronto, Chicago vs. Boston, Detroit vs. Montreal, Chicago vs. Montreal, Detroit vs. Boston, Chicago vs. New York, or any other possibilites that I might have forgotten. Anaheim vs. Ottawa was probably one of the last things they would have wanted. That, or Nashville vs. Tampa Bay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtlantaHotWings 1,126 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 Nahh if it was the way Buttman wanted it New York would be in the finals and the Vs guys would be on their knees in front of Messier!! Anyone catch the spotlight on the cup or whatever they called it. on Vs the other night? Brief glimpses of games and about 10 minutes of snuggling to the Rangers when they won the cup. NOT a mention of 2002 when a certain captain skated on one leg when they were talking about what players go through for the cup...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heroes of Hockeytown 694 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 This thread is downright embarrassing to see on the front page of the esteemed General Discussion halls of LGW. Please, someone take it out back and give it what it deserves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alienanxiety 23 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I didn't mean it was pre-determined like wrestling. I don't for a second think every team is trying it's hardest to win. I am just saying that I suspect the league has tried to give these small market teams every extra chance possible to win championships (whether it be the salary cap, revnue sharing and "timely officiating".) so far against ottawa, and against us too, anaheim doing worse obstruction than datyuk did at the end of game 5, but for some "timely" reason, the powers that be felt anaheim needed a 6 on 4 to finish the game. If that penalty wasn't called, we go up 3-1 in th series, and are almost certainly in the finals right now, playing an exciting skilled brand of hockey with the senators. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DyingAlive 27 Report post Posted June 1, 2007 I hear that Anaheim corks their sticks and use pine tar on their friction tape!!!! Say it isn't so! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vangvace 12 Report post Posted June 2, 2007 I didn't mean it was pre-determined like wrestling. I don't for a second think every team is trying it's hardest to win. I am just saying that I suspect the league has tried to give these small market teams every extra chance possible to win championships (whether it be the salary cap, revnue sharing and "timely officiating".) so far against ottawa, and against us too, anaheim doing worse obstruction than datyuk did at the end of game 5, but for some "timely" reason, the powers that be felt anaheim needed a 6 on 4 to finish the game. If that penalty wasn't called, we go up 3-1 in th series, and are almost certainly in the finals right now, playing an exciting skilled brand of hockey with the senators. soooo.... the salary cap and revenue sharing are a bad thing because it gives every team a chance? It's still up to the individual teams to be competitive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alienanxiety 23 Report post Posted June 2, 2007 (edited) yes, salary cap and revenue sharing (communism) is a bad thing - especially for us, fans of a free spending club. Edited June 2, 2007 by alienanxiety Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dynamo 0 Report post Posted June 2, 2007 I don't think I'd go as far as to say that the whole thing is fixed (although I know we all had a few choice words to say about the officiating). The whole point of the salary cap was to make it so teams like Detroit, Colorado, New Jersey, ect. would stop completely dominating the league and give teams like Nashville, Florida, Atlanta, Phoenix, ect. a chance to compete for the Cup. What Bettman doesn't seem to realize is that most people in those cities couldn't care less about hockey. Look at the ratings for the last 3 Cup Finals. It's because teams like Tampa, Carolina, and Anaheim are in the Finals, and nobody cares. He'd have a bigger audience if it was Detroit or another team like that. Or who knows, maybe it was a big screw-you to the real fans of the league. ratings are down 22% this year compared to last year Why not? Bettman sure does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,132 Report post Posted June 2, 2007 (edited) I'm not sure how, but I am convinced the NHL fixes or slants the playoffs. Either that or it is an incredible fluke that the last three seasons have seen bad market "Bettman teams" win the Stanley Cup over a Canadian team. It just seems to "perfect" for me. So I guess next year we will see the Atlanta Thrashers defeat the Vancouver Canucks in the finals? Or maybe San Jose will finally make the next step and defeat the Montreal Canadians for the coveted prize. ...I am not sure you are too far off base. Especially with the Bettman teams comment. Just look at the last 2 Cup winners and even this years finals. What better way to try and promote the sport where their wouldn't normally be support than to make them the Champion of the league. Sometimes it works, sometimes it don't! Tampa has fairly good support, but look at Carolina and even Florida after they made it to the finals, their fan support sucks unless they are actually in the finals. Look at Anaheim, even if they are handed the Cup, do you think the great people of Southern California will really give two sheets about what they do from now on, unless they are handed back to back ones? Look how support for the Kings waned after they made it to the Cup finals when Gretzky was there to now. Heck, you really didn't see has many Av fans around here this season, especially AFTER they were excluded from the playoffs... ...Bettman will never learn, of curse as long as his pockets are growing, he doesn't care, just ask William Clay Ford about that! ...not only is Bettman watering down the league by spreading the players to thin around the continent, he is also watering down what it means to actually EARN the Cup, by handing it year after year to teams that wouldn't and shouldn't be in the league, let alone competing for the Cup... Edited June 2, 2007 by LeftWinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Offsides 21 Report post Posted June 2, 2007 Not to sound all conspiracy-theorist...but...sometimes I think it is fixed. Not like...fixed, fixed, but pressure is put on the refs to make sure certain teams do better. They want differerent teams in the finals so the fans in those markets will get more into hockey. But, I may be wrong....it just REALLY seems like it some times. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites