Guest Agalloch Report post Posted October 7, 2007 ...overreact much? How am I overreacting? He's always been horrible. I have always complained about him, and with good reason. I'm obviously not the only one who feels this way, as I've seen many other posts in this thread saying how Samuelsson sucks/shouldn't be out there in OT/turns the puck over too much. It's not a requirement to like every player on the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 How funny that Robert Lazy and He Sucksâ„¢ Lang scored the tying goal. It sucks the Wings lost, but having all the people who incessantly ripped on Lang having to choke on that goal is worth it. I call it clutch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lidstromrules16 7 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 schneider is probably going to score on us when he gets back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viperar 16 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 bert....check langer...check schneids....tba Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
betterREDthandead 58 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 And then what? You going to choke again like you have the last few years? You used to be good, now you are just a regular season team, cant get it done in the playoffs anymore. Too bad we don't know if the Blackhawks could be a good playoff team. It's always a good laugh when fans of a bad regular-season club make fun of a team for being a good regular-season club. Besides, you seem to have slept through the first two rounds last year. You guys really are a cocky bunch, must really suck to lose to the s***ty Blackhawks huh? Yes, it does. I actually came on here to tell you guys great game, and then I read all this crap. All what crap? I'd say there isn't a soul in the hockey world - fans, media, players, coaches, GMs, scouts, and all the rest - who think the Wings won't make the playoffs. Surely you think the Wings will probably make the playoffs. There's no reason not to believe that. So why should Wings fans pretend like we don't believe it'll happen? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flip-check 6 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 And then what? You going to choke again like you have the last few years? You used to be good, now you are just a regular season team, cant get it done in the playoffs anymore. I actually came on here to tell you guys great game, and then I read all this crap. You guys really are a cocky bunch, must really suck to lose to the s***ty Blackhawks huh? Going to be a long year, dont take the Hawks to lightly or you will continue to get burned. Actually, I gotta say this before I maybe turn in for the night: Blackhawkdown, I DIG that you came over to tell us a great game. Please don't take the irrational ranting and raving from some personally: the Hawks earned this one. Seriously, I very much appreciate a rational Central division fan coming over and... being rational. Aside from the extreme reactions, Harold's right: Detroit fans don't expect to lose to Chicago. But still, don't get a negative opinion of us. Not all of us, at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 And then what? You going to choke again like you have the last few years? You used to be good, now you are just a regular season team, cant get it done in the playoffs anymore. The Blackhawks used to be good.... in the 60's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenrikRules40 14 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 How am I overreacting? He's always been horrible. I have always complained about him, and with good reason. I'm obviously not the only one who feels this way, as I've seen many other posts in this thread saying how Samuelsson sucks/shouldn't be out there in OT/turns the puck over too much. It's not a requirement to like every player on the team. I'm not saying you're required to to like every player on the team. However, I *am* saying it's only the second game of the season...maybe we could blame players for single-handedly losing games later. As shocked as I am to say it, we're not going to win 82 games this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Blackhawkdown Report post Posted October 7, 2007 (edited) You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats saying something. And just for the record im not saying the Blackhawks are going to be all of that, I really dont know, but I do think they are going to surprise a few people this year. Just by watching these first two games I can tell this team is different. Not Stanley Cup good, but I think they are going to have a solid season. Edited October 7, 2007 by Blackhawkdown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kylee 727 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats saying something. And just for the record im not saying the Blackhawks are going to be all of that, I really dont know, but I do think they are going to surprise a few people this year. Just by watching these first two games I can tell this team is different. Not Stanley Cup good, but I think they are going to have a solid season. i agree. if Khabibulin can play solid like he has early on, the blackhawks i think, will be a team that is in fringe of the playoffs fighting for a spot. they DO look different, but in order to make a serious run, they need havlat to be healthy and productive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detroit # 1 Fan 2,204 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats saying something. What is that saying exactly? He scored in the SO? Thats what its saying. If hasek had made the save, I could say your 18 year old baby just got stoned by my hall of fame goalie. Please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShanahanMan 473 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 (edited) And just for the record im not saying the Blackhawks are going to be all of that, I really dont know, but I do think they are going to surprise a few people this year. Just by watching these first two games I can tell this team is different. Not Stanley Cup good, but I think they are going to have a solid season. I sure hope so! It'd be great for the fans and the league if the Blackhawks have a good season. Here's hoping for more close Wings vs Blackhawks games! I wish we'd get a Franzen update already. Edited October 7, 2007 by ShanahanMan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theman19 47 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats saying something. And just for the record im not saying the Blackhawks are going to be all of that, I really dont know, but I do think they are going to surprise a few people this year. Just by watching these first two games I can tell this team is different. Not Stanley Cup good, but I think they are going to have a solid season. you know what really scares me,..you probably created this account just to post this crap,...and when your team is sitting dead last in the central.....again,......you'll be no wear near this site. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwingslady87 130 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats saying something. And just for the record im not saying the Blackhawks are going to be all of that, I really dont know, but I do think they are going to surprise a few people this year. Just by watching these first two games I can tell this team is different. Not Stanley Cup good, but I think they are going to have a solid season. The Blackhawks deserved that win. They played amazing well, and I would actually like to say congrats to you and your team. We can tell just by watching tonights game that Kane is going to be something amazing. You gotta admit the hawks haven't been so good in the past, and from past standings, people do get cocky. We were looking for a win tonight, we were more upset that our team took an early lead and gave it away, than we were about the hawks stepping up the game and taking the win. People were giving credit to Kane and Lang for their goals. To be honest with you if this is only a preview of things to come, i'm looking forward to the rest of the season. Its about time the games start becoming interesting especially when we're playing each other 8 times a season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flip-check 6 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 (edited) you know what really scares me,..you probably created this account just to post this crap,...and when your team is sitting dead last in the central.....again,......you'll be no wear near this site. He actually came over to give us a charitable "great game guys", but then got soured by reading the board reactions to the Hawks taking one from us. I believe it. Can't say I agree with being shocked that Wings fans are reacting badly, but when you've seen enough rabid Central div fans mindlessly saying "Wings suck"/"Dead Things blow" and any other choice in the endless litany... A fan that will try to act normal is something fresh. Edited October 7, 2007 by Flip-check Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 You are going to be hearing the name Patrick Kane a lot this year. 18 year old kid won the game over your hall of fame goalie, thats NOT saying something. Fixed it for you... big deal several players do that each game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZabiOfDetroit 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 CRAP! We lost!? Lang scored!?!?!?!??!?!? hell must have frozen over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
omnipotent_hudler 0 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 Yeah, my optimism for the season is gone. If you lose to the Blackhawks, you should just forget about your season. I'd just like to say that you, sir, are absolutely crazy. Remember the beginning of last years season? Much worse than a sloppy third period in a single game. And we completely forgot our season then, didn't we? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedWingedKitten 9 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 you know what really scares me,..you probably created this account just to post this crap,...and when your team is sitting dead last in the central.....again,......you'll be no wear near this site. There is no need for that, the guy came on to tell us good game... And hell y'all, it's the second game for cryin out loud! Lighten up a bit. Didn't we lose to the BlackHawks last year? Personally, I would rather lose to them early than late. I was not able to watch the whole game, however I was able to see the refs take away one of our goals, could someone tell me why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwingslady87 130 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 There is no need for that, the guy came on to tell us good game... And hell y'all, it's the second game for cryin out loud! Lighten up a bit. Didn't we lose to the BlackHawks last year? Personally, I would rather lose to them early than late. I was not able to watch the whole game, however I was able to see the refs take away one of our goals, could someone tell me why? The ref blew his whistle at the same time dats took his shot and being blind he didn't see the puck already in mid air (Although he was right in front of it....) So since he didn't see the shot take place at the time of blowing his whistle, no goal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeytown Red Wings 245 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 I knew Lang would score on us. I just knew it...when he had the puck in the slot, I already knew it was in the net. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedWingedKitten 9 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 The ref blew his whistle at the same time dats took his shot and being blind he didn't see the puck already in mid air (Although he was right in front of it....) So since he didn't see the shot take place at the time of blowing his whistle, no goal. Really? I did not know the refs had that much power. I'm not trying to be a homer, but if the ref had been 5 feet in a diferent directton we would have won, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Agalloch Report post Posted October 7, 2007 I'd just like to say that you, sir, are absolutely crazy. Remember the beginning of last years season? Much worse than a sloppy third period in a single game. And we completely forgot our season then, didn't we? It was a joke. I do, in fact, think that losing to Chicago is embarrassing, but one game never tells a season. We lost to the Blackhawks last year, too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nero 20 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 (edited) Really? I did not know the refs had that much power. I'm not trying to be a homer, but if the ref had been 5 feet in a diferent directton we would have won, right? Actually, we probably would have won had we gotten that goal. The play proceeded in a whole different direction which ultimately lead to the tying goal - if I recall correctly. What's the big deal with our former players scoring against us? They do not play for us anymore, it is their job to score against us. I'd be more concerned if our current roster was scoring against us. We know that is possible. It's not a big deal. Edited October 7, 2007 by Nero Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
redwingslady87 130 Report post Posted October 7, 2007 Really? I did not know the refs had that much power. I'm not trying to be a homer, but if the ref had been 5 feet in a diferent directton we would have won, right? If the ref was standing right behind the net, instead of off to the left his view of the puck would have been a better view because there wasn't as many bodies in the way. So I hope we would of, but they also did an audio check to see if the connection between the stick and the puck could be heard before the whistle and it was indecisive as well. So I think Dats literally took the shot at the exact time of the whistle being blown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites