VM1138 1,921 Report post Posted February 2, 2012 (edited) I like Nash and everything...but it won't happen. Columbus won't want what we have and Nash would solidify the Wings atop the Central for years. Columbus won't want to dump the face of their franchise to a division rival. I agree, like I said if Holland acquired Nash, then it pretty much eliminates us from the Suter sweeps unless Lids retires for sure AND Stuart leaves as a UFA. Also we can forget about Parise in the off season... I haven't done the math in a while, but earlier this year it seemed like we could sign Suter and Parise. So I don't see why we couldn't work Nash/Parise or Nash/Suter under the cap. We've got room, and lots of players will be leaving next season. (Bertuzzi, Holmstrom, Emeerton, Hudler (his contract is up, isn't it?), and so forth. Not to mention we have to trade for Nash so we'd be freeing up space that way, too. Though I still prefer Parise over Nash. Edited February 2, 2012 by VM1138 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingsfan4795 552 Report post Posted February 2, 2012 franzen and a 2nd would probably work for nash... but it wouldnt happen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Crazy 201 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 If Mule was moved insted of Flip it would probably not cost us as much. I too have a hard time seeing Flip go. Mule Mursak Kindl for Nash Pick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crashnburnluder 385 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 I think if u based a trade around this it could work , since of they move him it's for a rebuild To New Jersey: Ilya Kovalchuk, Anssi Salmela, Atlanta's 2010 2nd round pick To Atlanta: Johnny Oduya, Niklas Bergfors, Patrice Cormier, New Jersey's 2010 1st and 2nd round picks Obviously he is already signed, but also playing under par.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zetterling 16 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 Filpulla isn't going anywhere. Maybe they'll trade a fast skating 3rd or 4th liner and a Griffins player and a draft pick. If that isn't enough I doubt they make a move. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,131 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 I like Nash and everything...but it won't happen. Columbus won't want what we have and Nash would solidify the Wings atop the Central for years. Columbus won't want to dump the face of their franchise to a division rival. I haven't done the math in a while, but earlier this year it seemed like we could sign Suter and Parise. So I don't see why we couldn't work Nash/Parise or Nash/Suter under the cap. We've got room, and lots of players will be leaving next season. (Bertuzzi, Holmstrom, Emeerton, Hudler (his contract is up, isn't it?), and so forth. Not to mention we have to trade for Nash so we'd be freeing up space that way, too. Though I still prefer Parise over Nash. Nash is at $7.8M, Suter will cost at least $7.5M if not $8M+, you have to re-sign Abdelkader and Helm who will get at least $1.25M and Abby getting near if not at $1M. There is roughly $25M cap available for next season and that takes up roughly $18M of it PLUS add Smith's $875,000. It leaves roughly $5.7M to sign another back-up goalie a 7th defenseman and bring up or sign a 13th forward. So yes it could work with Nash/Suter or Parise/Suter but only if Lidstrom and Stuart are not here next year. If Lidstrom comes back, that cuts out one of them. Now of course if Cleary, Filppula or Franzen were involved in a trade for Nash or Suter or Parise, sure that would free up much more money, but that is a big if... I would love Nash or Parise here too, and I think our #1 priority is Suter... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 I fear that if Columbus offered us Nash for Filppula straight up (which of course they wouldn't), many posters here on LGW wouldn't take it. Same with Iginla or Perry. Flip is having a great year, but you can't get a franchise player without trading a good player in return. Filppula or Franzen are the only ones who fit that definition. If you want a lot, you have to give up something good in return. 4 Bar Down, Uncle Danny, Rick D and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
atodaso 279 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 If you want a lot, you have to give up something good in return. Any chance Z gets moved? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ozzie30 170 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 Any chance Z gets moved? None. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kylee 727 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 Any chance Z gets moved? thankfully, no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
atodaso 279 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 None. thankfully, no. Not our Zetterberg though. The impostor playing his part this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Konnan511 1,736 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 2012 1st round pick Valteri Filpulla Jan Mursak Brendan Smith Ummm what? Please don't ever be our GM. I fear that if Columbus offered us Nash for Filppula straight up (which of course they wouldn't), many posters here on LGW wouldn't take it. Same with Iginla or Perry. Flip is having a great year, but you can't get a franchise player without trading a good player in return. Filppula or Franzen are the only ones who fit that definition. If you want a lot, you have to give up something good in return. Filppula for Iginla straight up? No. That'd be a terrible trade for many obvious reasons. Filppula for Nash or Ryan straight up? Maybe. Then factor in salaries, no way i do Flip for Nash straight up. Ryan, I'd have a hard time saying no to, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 Ummm what? Please don't ever be our GM. Settle down now. The OP asked what it would TAKE, not what I'd trade. I think for a player like Nash, who is basically the entire Columbus franchise, it would have to be ridiculous overpayment. Judging by your response, you'd agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king_malice 17 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 To Det- Nash To Columbus- Cleary,Kindl,2012 2nd round,maybe a young goalie saying Mason has completely fallen apart last couple seasons, McCollum,Mrazek not sure if we still have rights to Larsson even you have to look at the Kovalchuk deal i would think as somewhat the same type of package To Atl- Cormier,Bergfors,Oduya,1st round pick,2nd round pick To Nj- Kovalchuk,Salmela,2nd round pick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigWillieStyle 662 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 To Det- Nash To Columbus- Cleary,Kindl,2012 2nd round,maybe a young goalie saying Mason has completely fallen apart last couple seasons, McCollum,Mrazek not sure if we still have rights to Larsson even you have to look at the Kovalchuk deal i would think as somewhat the same type of package To Atl- Cormier,Bergfors,Oduya,1st round pick,2nd round pick To Nj- Kovalchuk,Salmela,2nd round pick You have to keep in mind that Kovalchuk was to be an UFA and had told Atlanta that he would not re-sign there. His trade value dropped significantly at that point. They took the best offer they could get, which minus the picks, was The Devils making room for Ilya's contract, by cutting contract dollars from their roster. The players going back to Atlanta were more for financial terms than for playing ability. Regarding Suters asking price, Darren Dreger was on NHL Tonight last night, and had stated that the asking price for Suter, if The Preds were to offer him for trade, would be, A roster player, A top prospect, A second tier prospect, And a first round pick. I'm pretty sure that that statement was was from Poile, but I'm not 100% sure. It could very well have been Dreger's speculation, but I thought it was paraphrased from Poile. Something think about for all of you empire builders. 1 55fan reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greenrebellion 415 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 i'd rather have jeff carter. more versatile as a rh center and on a less lucrative (but still huge) contract. would cost less than nash too imo. same age as nash if I'm not mistaken (27). agreed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
achildr1 255 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 (edited) i'd rather have jeff carter. more versatile as a rh center and on a less lucrative (but still huge) contract. would cost less than nash too imo. same age as nash if I'm not mistaken (27). Nonsense. Ever heard Jeff Carter talk or listened to any of the crap that he's suppossedly said or did. Guy isn't a Red Wing, period. His contract is terrible for us. Rick Nash is an absolute force and put on a team where he doesn't have so much responsibility and he's paired with better players, he could be exactly what we need. To Det- Nash To Columbus- Cleary,Kindl,2012 2nd round,maybe a young goalie saying Mason has completely fallen apart last couple seasons, McCollum,Mrazek not sure if we still have rights to Larsson even you have to look at the Kovalchuk deal i would think as somewhat the same type of package To Atl- Cormier,Bergfors,Oduya,1st round pick,2nd round pick To Nj- Kovalchuk,Salmela,2nd round pick No offense, but I can't believe your serious. This is a terrible deal for Columbus. A Superstar talent for our spare parts doesn't even work on NHL 12. If you used the Kovalchuk deal as a basis it would look more like... Filppula, Ericsson, Mrazek, 1st (If Columbus won) Nyquist, Ericsson, McCullom 1st (If we won) Although it can be argued that if we get rid of Ericason we will win either way! Edited February 3, 2012 by achildr1 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2probert4 8 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 To Detroit: Rick Nash Antoine Vermette/Kristian Huselius To Columbus: 1st 2012 3rd 2012 Valtteri Filppula Jiri Hudler Jakub Kindl Jan Mursak Tomas Tatar Nash Vermette Huselius = 14 mill give or take coming back... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ogreslayer 1,069 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 For C'bus to trade the face of their franchise & the best player to ever put on their sweater to an intra-division rival? Kenny would have to empty the cubbard for that & I don't see that happening. I could see the Jackets taking much less though to get rid of Carter & his salary in order to focus on a different rebuilding plan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Echolalia 2,961 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 Its funny, but I would accept most of the trade proposals posted here if it meant getting Nash on a line wih datsyuk 1 Nev reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Z Winged Dangler 2,082 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 I don't think Filppula will be traded but I don't think he has to. Nyquist, Mursak, Smith, 2012 + 2013 1st round draft pick. Go for the cup. i don't get why everyone on here thinks that Nyquist and Smith are going anywhere...they're the next 2 big Wings that will be lifers on this team, mark my words. Tatar is far more expendable than Nyquist and no ******* way in hell we get rid of Smith, a guy with Shea Weber like potential for anyone whose actually wathched the kid play hockey. the future wings prospects that should not EVER be moved cause of their potential upside are Nyquist, Smith, Jurco, Sheahan, Pulkkinen, IronHook, Andersson and Mrazek. the rest are free game, but if you guys think that the wings should let filppula go (whose been having a career year and just getting better), Nyquist and Smith (the 2 best players on the Griffins) and a 1st for a guy that's having his worst career year with 51 games, 17 goals, 16 assists, 33 pts, -23 rating....than you're a complete idiot! we rag on Z everyday and he's got 35 points and is a + player! and BTW, flip is tied for 2nd on the team with 41 pts and +14 rating. do i want Nash on the Wings? hell yeah. what is he currently worth? max: 2012 1st round pick, Tatar and Almqvist anything more than that or offering a prospect that is potentially future star material...no dice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 i don't get why everyone on here thinks that Nyquist and Smith are going anywhere...they're the next 2 big Wings that will be lifers on this team, mark my words. Tatar is far more expendable than Nyquist and no ******* way in hell we get rid of Smith, a guy with Shea Weber like potential for anyone whose actually wathched the kid play hockey. the future wings prospects that should not EVER be moved cause of their potential upside are Nyquist, Smith, Jurco, Sheahan, Pulkkinen, IronHook, Andersson and Mrazek. the rest are free game, but if you guys think that the wings should let filppula go (whose been having a career year and just getting better), Nyquist and Smith (the 2 best players on the Griffins) and a 1st for a guy that's having his worst career year with 51 games, 17 goals, 16 assists, 33 pts, -23 rating....than you're a complete idiot! we rag on Z everyday and he's got 35 points and is a + player! and BTW, flip is tied for 2nd on the team with 41 pts and +14 rating. do i want Nash on the Wings? hell yeah. what is he currently worth? max: 2012 1st round pick, Tatar and Almqvist anything more than that or offering a prospect that is potentially future star material...no dice. Some of these poster's trade package proposals are not what THEY would trade, rather just ballparks of what they think it would take - ie: what they think Columbus would ask for. For instance, when answering the OP's question "what would it take to get Nash" I said this: 2012 1st round pickValteri Filpulla Jan Mursak Brendan Smith I didn't say Holland should make the deal, or that I would want him to, but this is a lot closer to what Howson would ask for than say Cleary, Tatar, Eaves and a 2nd round pick. Basically, it would take a massive ******* package to land Nash, and rightfully so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
achildr1 255 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 i don't get why everyone on here thinks that Nyquist and Smith are going anywhere...they're the next 2 big Wings that will be lifers on this team, mark my words. Tatar is far more expendable than Nyquist and no ******* way in hell we get rid of Smith, a guy with Shea Weber like potential for anyone whose actually wathched the kid play hockey. the future wings prospects that should not EVER be moved cause of their potential upside are Nyquist, Smith, Jurco, Sheahan, Pulkkinen, IronHook, Andersson and Mrazek. the rest are free game, but if you guys think that the wings should let filppula go (whose been having a career year and just getting better), Nyquist and Smith (the 2 best players on the Griffins) and a 1st for a guy that's having his worst career year with 51 games, 17 goals, 16 assists, 33 pts, -23 rating....than you're a complete idiot! we rag on Z everyday and he's got 35 points and is a + player! and BTW, flip is tied for 2nd on the team with 41 pts and +14 rating. do i want Nash on the Wings? hell yeah. what is he currently worth? max: 2012 1st round pick, Tatar and Almqvist anything more than that or offering a prospect that is potentially future star material...no dice. You had me with how much Nyquist and Smith mean but fell off big at what Nash is worth. Our 1st are basically 2nd because they're so late and Almquist may never be NHL material let alone good. I think Holland would trade Nyquist for Nash but not Smith. I think he'd do Nyquist + Ericsson+Andersson+1st and that's about double value of your proposal and I'm not even sure Columbus would agree to that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kira 451 Report post Posted February 3, 2012 No, no, no, no, no, no and no. Do I make myself clear? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kass 7 Report post Posted February 4, 2012 Nash's value to the Jackets is much higher than his point totals this year, or even his career-average point totals, would suggest. The man isn't just a 'franchise player', he IS the franchise. 90% of the jerseys in Nationwide on any given game night will be #61. He is just about the ONLY thing Jackets fans have to look forward to before the start of every season, and the only name on the Jackets that casual hockey fans in Ohio are guaranteed to know. He brings in far more in ticket sales, merchandise, and general marketability than any single player on the Red Wings right now or in the last six years. He is nearly on the same level as Yzerman when it comes to his personal value to the franchise, and yet everybody here seems to think they can give up a single high pick, two or three prospects, plus Hudler and get the rock that the Blue Jackets are built upon. It's not going to happen. You need to give Columbus something that will allow them to either compete immediately or gives them a very, very bright future, and Hudler + the 30th overall pick + Mursak + Tatar does not fall into that category. Frankly, if you want Rick Nash then you're going to have to take a beating on par with, or maybe even worse than, the Kessel trade, and I doubt Holland would be willing to do that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites