Edited by NBCnothingbutcrosby, 09 April 2012 - 03:12 PM.
Dan Cleary openly admits to being at 50%
#1
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:12 PM
- redwings1914, dragonballgtz, edicius and 5 others like this
#2
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:20 PM
Honestly, as nice as it is to know that Cleary doesn't just suck, it is getting really annoying to watch him play poorly and find out that it is because of another nagging injury he is having.
- redwings1914, Z Winged Dangler, LidsFan and 1 other like this

#3
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:21 PM
http://www.freep.com/article/20120409/SPORTS05/120409039/1053/sports05
Red Wings forward Dan Cleary may only be at 50% due to his troublesome left knee, but he’s completely committed to being in the lineup for the playoffs.
Cleary practiced today after missing the final two games of the regular season. It was clear he was still in pain. “Yeah,” Cleary said. “Nothing I can really do. The rest helps a lot to bring down the swelling, but once you get back on the ice, it’s pretty sore.”
Cleary said he takes pain medication when he plays, but not when he practices.
“I’m going to play for sure,” Cleary said. “When you practice, there’s no pain reliever involved. It feels a little better in the game.”
How effective can he be?
“Mentally, I’m just going to have to find a way to get through it,” Cleary said. “Do the best I can and try to contribute. Try to be a factor.”
When asked to put a percentage on his health, he said “50 (percent) probably.”..
(read article for rest of the story)
- esteef, Uncle Danny, Frozen-Man and 4 others like this

That's right. Sad Simpsons Indian. I went there.
#4
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:30 PM
#5
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:39 PM
#6
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:39 PM
Says he's going to play... WTF. You're at 50% you fricken moron, you're doing more harm than good!!!! I'm livid.
Right. Because I'm sure it's his call if he plays or not. How selfish of him.
- 55fan, roboturner, P. Marlowe and 2 others like this
#7
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:42 PM
Some guys can play at 50% and still help the team. As we've seen all season, Cleary at 50% is not helping the team at all. In fact, he's hurting the team and is rather easy to play against right now.
He needs to sit.
- redwings1914, edicius, hillbillywingsfan and 7 others like this
#8
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:43 PM
Not sure what my opinion is right now. Its good to hear he's committed and all, but as others have said, it would have been better if he had been just sitting out getting healed up instead of dragging ass all season just to get to playoffs at 50%. I wish we could replace him, especially since its now common knowledge that he will be little help due to his injury, but the team can only stand to have so many AHLERs. As much as it sucks to have these injured or otherwise useless players in, I can understand managements apprehension to replace them.
I'll see if I can find the link but I remember reading that they intended to sit him out and get healthy/surgery but then Dats got injured and they told him that they needed him to play and then would just get the problem fixed in the off-season. As too him being in the lineup now, that really is Babs decision and he wouldn't play him unless he thought it was the best option that the Wings have available to them.
“A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
- George Washington
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
#9
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:44 PM
- Z Winged Dangler, LidsFan, roboturner and 3 others like this
#10
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:44 PM
He shouldn't be playing.
Some guys can play at 50% and still help the team. As we've seen all season, Cleary at 50% is not helping the team at all. In fact, he's hurting the team and is rather easy to play against right now.
He needs to sit.
If this really was a fact, he would be sitting.
- P. Marlowe and number9 like this
#11
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:48 PM
If this really was a fact, he would be sitting.
Is Babcock not watching the games out there? Cleary is just skating around aimlessly and isn't able to help the team. In not doing so, he's hurting it.
Call up some youngster from the minors who will play hungry and try to shine in the playoffs. Kind of like Helm in 2008. It's honestly more the coaching staff's fault than Cleary's. He'll play until he drops, but they have to step in there and realize it's not a good idea.
#12
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:53 PM
Is Babcock not watching the games out there? Cleary is just skating around aimlessly and isn't able to help the team. In not doing so, he's hurting it.
Call up some youngster from the minors who will play hungry and try to shine in the playoffs. Kind of like Helm in 2008. It's honestly more the coaching staff's fault than Cleary's. He'll play until he drops, but they have to step in there and realize it's not a good idea.
That's exactly my point. The fact that he's still in the lineup says that either the organization feels Cleary at 50% is still better than someone from GR at 100% or they just don't have any other choice. Conner comes to mind as a replacement but that pretty much tells me that Babcock thinks Cleary is worth more injured than a healthy Conner.
#13
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:55 PM
#14
Posted 09 April 2012 - 03:56 PM
Is Babcock not watching the games out there? Cleary is just skating around aimlessly and isn't able to help the team. In not doing so, he's hurting it.
Call up some youngster from the minors who will play hungry and try to shine in the playoffs. Kind of like Helm in 2008. It's honestly more the coaching staff's fault than Cleary's. He'll play until he drops, but they have to step in there and realize it's not a good idea.
Exactly, Cleary is in a bad spot. If it came out that the coaching staff wanted him to play and he said he didn't feel good enough he would be ripped here for having to heart. The coaching staff are the ones that (whether right or wrong) will determine if having Cleary in the lineup is a net positive or a net negative. I don't think you fault the player for going out with an injury and playing as hard as he can if he shouldn't be in the lineup that is a coaching decision.
- 55fan likes this
“A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.”
- George Washington
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain
#16
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:16 PM
- Zetterling and ace76 like this

"During Robert Lang’s time in Detroit, he caused me anguish. Other times he brought me and my family great joy. Robert Lang occasionally coasts, and spends time searching for the best pane of glass to best view the reflection of his flowing mullet. Other times he is a strong-armed force with the puck. I never knew what to expect from Robert Lang. He is The Enigma. " - A2Y
#17
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:24 PM
- LidsFan likes this
- uk_redwing
HockeyArchive Twitter
#18
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:26 PM
That's exactly my point. The fact that he's still in the lineup says that either the organization feels Cleary at 50% is still better than someone from GR at 100% or they just don't have any other choice. Conner comes to mind as a replacement but that pretty much tells me that Babcock thinks Cleary is worth more injured than a healthy Conner.
its not that simple... for us as fans, we just look at it like we are playing nhl12 on xbox and want to pick the best player. in real life, they have balance not only which player gives the better shot, but also what the long term ramifications are. perhaps they didn't want to ruin clearys confidence by sitting him a long stretch. perhaps they dont want to get a reputation as a team that gives up on injured players. perhaps objective evaluation of which player brings more to the table is clouded by the personal relationships that exist with the coach and/or management. perhaps there is a hope that if he kept playing down the stretch that when the playoffs arrived he would be able to step it up because of his experience and that he was just laying off a bit in the regular season. maybe the team didn't want to waste one of its post deadline callups on someone to replace cleary unless they absolutely had to.
now, with all those hypotheticals, i can also concede that maybe you are right. maybe babcock just thought that cleary at 50% was better than calling up conner, andersson, etc. my main point though, is that it is a much more complicated situation than you make it out to be and there is a very real chance that they weren't totally behind cleary but just had to consider all the implications of making a change.
- 55fan, Uncle Danny and sleepwalker like this
I love Maltby, but to say he wasn't a ****** is a dis-service to his career of douchebaggery.
#19
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:27 PM
#20
Posted 09 April 2012 - 04:46 PM
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Why is Cleary still on the team?
|
General Discussion | NBCnothingbutcrosby |
|
|
|
Injured
Danny DeKeyser suffers broken thumb, out for playoffs |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
love being overlooked |
General Discussion | nyqvististhefuture |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













