MidMichSteve 1,115 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 (edited) raffi torres - a nobody, repeat offender, 25 game suspension byron bitz - ??? 2 games carl hagelin - got some skill, nobody knows him, so 3 games matt carkner - well, boyle had it coming, 1 game james neal - too much talent, 1 game aaron asham - repeat offender, won't be missed, 4 games craig adams - instigator in last 5 minutes = automatic 1 gamer andrew shaw - won't be missed, 3 games nicklas backstrom - too much talent, 1 game see, too many people know who weber is, and he's too important to the team/league. so, NO GAMES FOR YOU! ...and it was against the Wings in a playoff game. Duh! You could add: Malkin - instigator in last 5 minutes = Rescinded Edited April 21, 2012 by MidMichSteve Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SiLkK19 67 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 What a joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Heaten Report post Posted April 21, 2012 What comes to my mind is the fact that Coyotes are the losers because he's a good playoff player to have on the ice. Think about it, GMs are going to need to look at players track records before signing them as an UFA because losing them to suspensions hurts the team. Who cares about Torres, he's always been a ******, but he's the type of player Red Wings could use in the Nashville series. He's just reckless like Matt Cooke (though I think Matt Cooke is more reckless). So does this mean when Holland (or any other GM) are shopping UFA, are they going to stay clear of players because of their past? Does this mean if Ovechkin becomes available on the trading block, GMs stay clear of him because of his past? Ovie could be one bad hit away from a 5-10 gamer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HockeyCrazy3033 168 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 He deserves it. Take into account his history along with him having 2-3 this season and yeah 25 games seems justified to me. He obviously hasn't learned from his past punishments. Maybe this will finally teach him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VM1138 1,921 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Holy crap that's ridiculously high, and I hate Torres. The hit was suspension-worthy, but it wasn't one of the worst hits I've seen this year. 25 games is ridiculous. I've liked Shanny so far but it's either nothing or too much with him lately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WorkingOvertime 536 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 IMO 10-15 would have been sufficient. The hit wasn't too bad, but he has a long history of these types of hits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Holy crap that's ridiculously high, and I hate Torres. The hit was suspension-worthy, but it wasn't one of the worst hits I've seen this year. 25 games is ridiculous. I've liked Shanny so far but it's either nothing or too much with him lately. Yeah, you could say other guys have gotten 1 game suspensions for the same type of hit. There's definitely a lot of inconsistency from Shanahan in these playoffs. He seems to have no clue what he's doing. But still, it's hard to feel bad for a dirtbag like Torres. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 I don't know how anyone can say this is too harsh. No one in the entire league has the kind of head-hunting track record Torres has over the past few years. He's shown over and over that he's always on the lookout for a chance to knock another player out of the game. He's a classless punk and deserves every minute of this suspension. Holy crap that's ridiculously high, and I hate Torres. The hit was suspension-worthy, but it wasn't one of the worst hits I've seen this year. 25 games is ridiculous. I've liked Shanny so far but it's either nothing or too much with him lately. Shanny has said many times that past history is a big factor in determining the severity of suspensions. 1 esteef reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Sure Shanahan should have suspended Weber for at least 1 game but this is Raffi Torres a guy known for dirty hits targeting the head. He could have dished out a very severe maybe even career ending injury so I'm absolutely fine with that one. Torres just doesn't get the message he is only a real coward hate this guy. Just wonder how long the next suspension will be 50 75? The swf explained really well why it was that long and justified so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrasco 1,312 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 His history and Hossa's injury is what warranted this. I don't have a problem with this decision, he had to be taught a lesson. The part I didn't like was how they emphasized he broke several rules. Most bad hits break several rules but they just call one. As for all the other inconsistencies in the bans, well that's probably best to be kept in another thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
esteef 2,679 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 His history and Hossa's injury is what warranted this. I don't have a problem with this decision, he had to be taught a lesson. The part I didn't like was how they emphasized he broke several rules. Most bad hits break several rules but they just call one. As for all the other inconsistencies in the bans, well that's probably best to be kept in another thread. Exactly. We don't need to hear about how Shanny dropped the ball by not suspending Weber in every f***in' suspension discussion. We get it. Weber should've been suspended. But this one Shanny got right. Torres is the poster boy for s*** like this. esteef 1 sputman reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Viewed as a single suspension this is the right move. Torres is a repeated headhunter and dirty player. He goes out there trying to injure guys and needs a wake up call. The fine and suspension earlier this season clearly didn't do that. Looked at in the context of the playoffs it's just another example of shanny being wildly inconsistent especially where star players are concerned. The real tone will be set when he actually suspends a Neal or Oveckin same as he would a 4th liner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lonewuhf 47 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 After seeing Shanahans compilation of all the Torres-stupidity - I think this serves him right. I originally voted "too harsh" before I watched the suspension video, after it I went back, deleted my vote, and voted just right. This idiot deserved it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nev 1,085 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 I knew it was going to be a hefty suspension given his history, maybe even double figures. But bloody nora, 25 games???? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RusDRW 155 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 major problem with this is that both Neal and Weber are repeat offenders themselves. They already demonstrated they may have lose their cool and try to injure people. What Torres do is indeed worse but basing desicion on repeat offending and taking into account this precedent those two guys had to be suspended for approximately 10 games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electrophile 3,554 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 God, quit bitching about the Weber non-suspension. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference in the series. 2 Shaman and uk_redwing reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sureWhyNot 19 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 I don't know how anyone can say this is too harsh. No one in the entire league has the kind of head-hunting track record Torres has over the past few years. He's shown over and over that he's always on the lookout for a chance to knock another player out of the game. He's a classless punk and deserves every minute of this suspension. Shanny has said many times that past history is a big factor in determining the severity of suspensions. I'll say it - the penalty was to harsh. You are right Torres has a history of bad hits, but One could argue that this one was not one of them. I have seen Kronwall make nearly identical hits to the one laid on Hossa. 5-10 games though would have been fine with me. 25 though? Come on man, you can't be seriously defending this decision. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miksteri 55 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Sick joke by shanaban Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zettie85 106 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 (edited) Joke. I'm actually mad. I think they mixed up Keith's suspension with Raffi. Edited April 21, 2012 by zettie85 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
esteef 2,679 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 I'll say it - the penalty was to harsh. You are right Torres has a history of bad hits, but One could argue that this one was not one of them. I have seen Kronwall make nearly identical hits to the one laid on Hossa. 5-10 games though would have been fine with me. 25 though? Come on man, you can't be seriously defending this decision. Kronwall has had questionable hits where he jumped into them in the pre-head shot focused NHL, but since then he has made an effort to keep his skates on the ice which is proven by the lack of punishment he has received. And he always hits the player with the puck, unlike the majority of Torres's hits including this one. Very different. Torres is a piece of s*** head hunter that got what he deserved far too late in my opinion. esteef Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zettie85 106 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Kronwall has had questionable hits where he jumped into them in the pre-head shot focused NHL, but since then he has made an effort to keep his skates on the ice which is proven by the lack of punishment he has received. And he always hits the player with the puck, unlike the majority of Torres's hits including this one. Very different. Torres is a piece of s*** head hunter that got what he deserved far too late in my opinion. esteef Mcsorley got 23 for using a weapon. Shanahan is a joke, ex-wing or not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 Mcsorley got 23 for using a weapon. Shanahan is a joke, ex-wing or not. Shanahan didn't suspend McSorely. 1 esteef reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MidMichSteve 1,115 Report post Posted April 21, 2012 God, quit bitching about the Weber non-suspension. It wouldn't have made a damn bit of difference in the series. How can you say that? The wings would probably have won the next game if Weber had been suspended. Oh, wait. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zettie85 106 Report post Posted April 22, 2012 Shanahan didn't suspend McSorely. Obviously. The point is zero consistency. I'll use Keith. Not a repeat offender but he did just as much damage and his elbow was blatantly disgusting. 7 games. I'll say again. It's a joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
55fan 5,133 Report post Posted April 22, 2012 Pretty much what harold said. I voted too harsh, not because he doesn't deserve 25 games, but because 25 is a value, like money. You find the value of something by comparing it to similar things. The value of your home or car is assessed by comparables. There is a market value and it depends on what people will pay, or, in this case, what comparable infractions have received. The non-suspension of Weber happened early on, and therefore set the tone of the playoff suspension value for this round of the playoffs (thus being a perfectly acceptable conversation topic). The post-headshot era is looking to this year for setting a tone. The tone has been more of an arpeggio. 1 MidMichSteve reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites