high_stick69 7 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 It seems like the only reason we don't beat the Blackhawks is because Lang has the game of his life everytime we play them! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sputman 1,268 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 It seems like the only reason we don't beat the Blackhawks is because Lang has the game of his life everytime we play them! i don't miss him, no. i do miss lapointe, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CrossCheck24 2 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Who? Ive been to a couple of 'hawks games and he seems to be doing well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I miss Bobert! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedStormRising 7 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Definitely not... When I was at the Wild game and I believe Sammy had a turnover, I thought to myself "Wow, I'm glad we still don't have Lang." Then when someone else didn't hustle to the puck and let a Wild player get it, I thought to myself "Wow, I'm glad we still don't have Lang." It seemed to have been a common thought when I saw a Wings player sucking it up out there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rwfan007 18 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 lang? lang, lang lang, OH! the pylon that had a wings jersey on? nope, dont miss him at all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HkyTwn 5 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 A whole lot of....no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mickeyisms Rule! 0 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I was watching a classic NHL game on NHL Network the other day. It was the Caps when he was still with them vs the Rangers (if I recall correctly). I do recall correctly that he had one horrible turnover at his own blue line that resulted in an easy goal for the other team. It brought back many memories and refreshed my faith that Bobby Lang not being a Red Wing can only benefit the Wings in the long run. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shannyfan1414 0 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 What a dumb question. I don't and never will miss him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OsGOD 3 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 (edited) lang? lang, lang lang, OH! the pylon that had a wings jersey on? nope, dont miss him at all No no no... that was Larry Murphy who was the pylon... Lang was the one that would score goals in clutch times when the rest of the team wouldn't Edited December 27, 2007 by OsGOD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
omnipotent_hudler 0 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 No. I kinda wish we had signed Sopel though. Imagine our D without Lilja : Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 There is a perfect explanation for Lang's success in Chicago. In Detroit he was the fat, lazy bum on a team full of hard-working veterans. Also, we have ruthless fans, and expect a lot out of the Wings every year. In Chicago, he is a veteran playing on a team full of young players that look up to him. Not that much is expected either of him or of the team, hence there's no pressure on him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Systemfel 33 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 No at all. But I had the feeling that he would be awesome against us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tony 3 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 i only miss 2 players yzerman and probert Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 1,049 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Let me think about that for a se-- NO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
imisssergei 0 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I don't miss him directly. I miss the void he left being filled. That is, a legit second line scoring threat. No, neither Rex nor Flip fill that roll. The Wings need that second line production in a bad way, they won't get far in the playoffs without it. And like any true Wings fan, I know that bringing home Lord Stanley is the only important thing. Making the playoffs just doesn't cut it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I don't miss him directly. I miss the void he left being filled. That is, a legit second line scoring threat. No, neither Rex nor Flip fill that roll. The Wings need that second line production in a bad way, they won't get far in the playoffs without it. And like any true Wings fan, I know that bringing home Lord Stanley is the only important thing. Making the playoffs just doesn't cut it. Agreed. Lang was fulfllling that role less and less himself, so it was definitely time for him to go. But there's still the void there, though Flip and Hudler have done pretty well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FedorovGurl 2 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Miss Lang? Ummmm that would be a resounding NO. I do miss Fischer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
irishtemper14+25 11 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 i liked lang, but i like him on another teamm getting ice time he deserves....he is better than sammy though, i would make that trade anyday Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Earthhuman 8 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I don't miss him directly. I miss the void he left being filled. That is, a legit second line scoring threat. No, neither Rex nor Flip fill that roll. I was going to say that you spoke too soon, but amazingly, you typed that at a point in time where 3/4 of the goals scored in tonights game were by them. They have gotten better and better all season. I was going to say Hudler especially (24 points in 35 games), but Filppula has elevated his game with 7 goals in the last 9 games. Are these not 2nd line numbers? It also amazes me that anyone at all can look at the best offense, defense, goaltending, and individual performances, together on one team, and clamour for more. Settle! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barrie 900 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 What a dumb question. I second that! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zata40 3 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 why would I miss lang? he was lazy and he sucked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YoungGuns1340 1 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Wow...now that you mention it....I never realized how much more energy this team seems to play with now that hes gone. I mean...every forward line we have now is so hardworking that Id forgotten what a lazy and apathetic game he played. Not to mention those flubbed passes that were constantly blocked or picked off. The only player that even comes close to Lang is Sammy, and he still plays with energy and defensive awareness most nights (but those blocked passes/shots need to stop..) So do I miss him? Absolutely not. Id much prefer the breakout performances of Flip and Hudler to Langs lazy ass eating up ice time he doesnt deserve. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
auxlepli 17 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 Miss Lang? I thought he was married. Shouldn't it be Mrs. Lang? Seriously though, no, I don't miss him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted December 27, 2007 I was going to say that you spoke too soon, but amazingly, you typed that at a point in time where 3/4 of the goals scored in tonights game were by them. They have gotten better and better all season. I was going to say Hudler especially (24 points in 35 games), but Filppula has elevated his game with 7 goals in the last 9 games. Are these not 2nd line numbers? It also amazes me that anyone at all can look at the best offense, defense, goaltending, and individual performances, together on one team, and clamour for more. Settle! I think it's because we've seen the Wings dominate in the regular season so many times before, yet come up short in the postseason. I love that they're on a roll now, and that Huds and Flip are stepping up, but I still think this team could use more nastiness on D, and a seasoned scorer on that second line. That or hopefully someone on that 2nd line will establish themselves as a constistent postseason threat on the 2nd line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites