Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Rule Changes in the AHL (what the NHL has considered)


  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#1 drumnj

drumnj

    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 770 posts
  • Location:Iowa

Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:17 AM

Yesterday the American Hockey League annoced a few new rule changes.  I know the overtime and fighting (Yzerman suggested it last year) ones have been considered by the NHL as well.  This may be a test run in the AHL and could be something we'll see in the NHL for the future.

 

Rule 85 (“Overtime”)

  • During the regular season, the sudden-death overtime period will be seven minutes (7:00) in length, preceded by a “dry scrape” of the entire ice surface.
  • Teams will change ends at the start of overtime.
  • Full playing strength will be 4-on-4 until the first whistle following three minutes of play (4:00 remaining), at which time full strength will be reduced to 3-on-3 for the duration of the overtime period.
  • If the game is still tied following overtime, a winner will be determined by a three-player shootout.

Rule 20.4 (“Major Penalties”)

  • An automatic game misconduct will be applied to any player who has been assessed two major penalties for fighting or three major penalties for any infraction in the same game.

Rule 9.6 (“Helmets”)

  • A player on the ice whose helmet comes off during play will be assessed a minor penalty unless he immediately (a) exits the playing surface or (b) puts the helmet back on with the chin strap properly fastened.

 

http://theahl.com/ah...changes-p192792


Edited by drumnj, 12 July 2014 - 09:19 AM.

Your any-time FSD online source, with pre and post game coverage along with any Red Wings specials.  Youtube page: RedWingsLive1

Red Wings and Griffins Live Games Check my profile
Always looking for people to help with the site, be it coding (PHP & JS) or design work. PM me if you'd be interested.

 

Cleary on, Mike!
Cleary on, Ken!
Dan's World, Dan's World... Mediocrity!... Excellent!


#2 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,125 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 12 July 2014 - 09:37 AM

I think the helmet one is dumb. If you're in your own end on a pk defending and someone checks you, knocks the helmet off, somehow you deserve a penalty because you don't want to leave your team even more shorthanded to go put the helmet back on or go back to the bench?

#3 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,059 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:03 AM

1 good rule, 2 bad

#4 Shaman

Shaman

    Die hard Red Wing fan and realist.

  • Silver Booster
  • 3,846 posts
  • Location:Kalamazoo Michigan (WMU)

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:06 AM

I think the helmet one is dumb. If you're in your own end on a pk defending and someone checks you, knocks the helmet off, somehow you deserve a penalty because you don't want to leave your team even more shorthanded to go put the helmet back on or go back to the bench?

 

I hope they allow discretion for the officials in these kind of situations. 


Feuer und Wasser kommt nicht zusammen
Kann man nicht binden sind nicht verwandt
In Funken versunken steh ich in Flammen
und bin im Wasser verbrannt
Im Wasser verbrannt

#5 Hockeymom1960

Hockeymom1960

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,806 posts

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:09 AM

Dumb people running an awesome sport.



#6 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,125 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:10 AM

 
I hope they allow discretion for the officials in these kind of situations. 


If it was a rule in the nhl the refs would be given no discretion. The fact that you have to securely do the chin strap back up when you put the helmet back on is the worst part, this rule could seriously handicap a team at the wrong time

#7 Shaman

Shaman

    Die hard Red Wing fan and realist.

  • Silver Booster
  • 3,846 posts
  • Location:Kalamazoo Michigan (WMU)

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:11 AM

If it was a rule in the nhl the refs would be given no discretion. The fact that you have to securely do the chin strap back up when you put the helmet back on is the worst part, this rule could seriously handicap a team at the wrong time

 

Which is why it's better that it's in the AHL before it would come to the NHL. Let them work out the bugs so the NHL officials can f*** it up in new and interesting ways.


Feuer und Wasser kommt nicht zusammen
Kann man nicht binden sind nicht verwandt
In Funken versunken steh ich in Flammen
und bin im Wasser verbrannt
Im Wasser verbrannt

#8 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 21,048 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 12 July 2014 - 11:39 AM

Every single proposal is idiotic.

 

Weeding fighting out of the game has been going on slowly now.  Gimmmicky overtimes are absurd.  3 on 3 is not a situation you see in normal play.  It's not much different than deciding a game by shootout.  Just another gimmick to avoid a tie.  


According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#9 haroldsnepsts

haroldsnepsts

    "Classy"

  • HoF Booster Mod
  • 17,247 posts

Posted 12 July 2014 - 11:41 AM

For OT, I like the dry scrape idea and changing ends so teams have the long change.  

 

I'm  not crazy about the shifting to 3 on 3 during a 7 minute OT, but I'd still take it over a shootout.   It's at least worth seeing how is plays out in the AHL. 

 

 

The helmet rule and major penalty rule are pretty bad though. 

 

 

I'd be interested in them trying to really crack down on the hit from behind rule in the AHL.  Don't create a new rule, just enforce the existing one.  If they actually don't allow players to hit a guy in the numbers, it seems like it would protect defenseman and help with puck movement in the defensive zone.

 

Right now in the AHL and NHL the rule seems to be enforced as "you can hit a guy from behind into the boards, as long as it's not too bad or he doesn't end up getting hurt" which is a terrible standard. 



#10 Detroit # 1 Fan

Detroit # 1 Fan

    Truculence.

  • HoF Booster
  • 19,094 posts
  • Location:St John's

Posted 12 July 2014 - 11:43 AM

They're going to have the game of hockey ruined in 5 to 10 years. The OT rule is interesting, but if the other 2 make it into the NHL.... yikes.


#NOMOREKINDL


#11 RyanBarnes!

RyanBarnes!

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,987 posts

Posted 12 July 2014 - 03:54 PM

What a joke.
"Joey (Kocur) has no fear" -Lyndon Byers
"Empty-net goals are for homos" -Al Iafrate

#12 nawein

nawein

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 420 posts

Posted 12 July 2014 - 04:16 PM

I'm still in the "play hockey until the game ends" boat and I'd really like to see the NHL get away from 3 point games. Either that our make all games worth 3 points. First rule does nothing for that and it's still gimmicky so I don't like it.

I also think fighting has a place but there shouldn't be a need to fight in a game twice, this coming from someone who has played competitively for 20 years. So I like that rule. Keeps people honest but still playing hockey.

I see the purpose of the third rule but I still don't like it. If someone wants to risk a head injury by playing that's their choice. There are better ways to protect players from injury than penalizing them for giving their all.

#13 DickieDunn

DickieDunn

    http://redwingsandotherthings.wordpress.com/

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,611 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 12 July 2014 - 04:32 PM

They're going to have the game of hockey ruined in 5 to 10 years. The OT rule is interesting, but if the other 2 make it into the NHL.... yikes.

 

With the litigious society we live in coupled with the NFL lawsuit and the BS ones fringe ex-players are tossing at the NHL, the league has to be seen taking steps to cut down on head injuries.  Discouraging fighting and making sure people have helmets on are steps towards that.  If you want to blame someone, blame the lawyers and over-reacting hockey moms who go berserk over every bump and bruise.

 

The league won't be going away from the current standings point system anytime soon, but I'd rather see it be a win or nothing than the extra point for OT.  Failing that, 3 for a regulation win, 2 for OT win, 1 for OT loss, nothing for regulation loss.  The current format keeps teams bunched up more though, meaning it looks more exciting.


Edited by DickieDunn, 12 July 2014 - 04:34 PM.

Oh this young man has had a very trying rookie season, with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him, well, I guess that's more than most 21-year-olds can handle... Ogie Ogilthorpe!


#14 wings87

wings87

    Wake Up!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,033 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 12 July 2014 - 04:51 PM

I hate the current OT rules and I hate the proposed changes, just too convoluted. What would happen if it's still tied after 3-3? Both teams play table hockey to declare the winner?

"He usually shows up when the game is over and tries to be the hero. Puts his cape on and goes and flies out there." ~ Franzen 


#15 Euro_Twins

Euro_Twins

    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,125 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 12 July 2014 - 05:48 PM

I hate the current OT rules and I hate the proposed changes, just too convoluted. What would happen if it's still tied after 3-3? Both teams play table hockey to declare the winner?


Rock paper scissors. Best 2 of 3

#16 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,615 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 12 July 2014 - 07:24 PM

medium_tent.jpg


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#17 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,059 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:35 PM

Instead of a SH the win should be decided by each teams enforcer brawling it out until a decision is made.

Nvm, I don't wanna see my precious Dano get hurt.

#18 wings87

wings87

    Wake Up!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,033 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:39 PM

Instead of a SH the win should be decided by each teams enforcer brawling it out until a decision is made.

Nvm, I don't wanna see my precious Dano get hurt.


Our enforcer is our power play... No wait...

"He usually shows up when the game is over and tries to be the hero. Puts his cape on and goes and flies out there." ~ Franzen 


#19 number9

number9

    All The Best Players Wear A 9

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,059 posts
  • Location:Buffalo

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:42 PM

Our enforcer is our power play... No wait...


Our defense is our forwards

#20 wings87

wings87

    Wake Up!

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,033 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 12 July 2014 - 10:47 PM

Our defense is our forwards


This team is like opposite day, everyday.

"He usually shows up when the game is over and tries to be the hero. Puts his cape on and goes and flies out there." ~ Franzen 






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users