Rick D 394 Report post Posted July 16 5 hours ago, LeftWinger said: Berggren, Holl, 3rd, No salary retention needed. Essentially they would be helping us dump 3.4 in Holl instead of retaining any of Karlsson. I'd be okay with this. 1 LeftWinger reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,153 Report post Posted July 17 14 hours ago, Rick D said: Essentially they would be helping us dump 3.4 in Holl instead of retaining any of Karlsson. I'd be okay with this. ...and $1.8M in Berggren. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted July 17 (edited) Apparently it's time for my yearly reminder that Erik Karlsson isn't any good. I'm not really sure why I have to keep telling everyone this. We can prove this, statistically. He scored 53 total points. He had 38 even strength points and got SCORED ON 62 times, accounting for his whopping -24 +/-. So that means he only scored 15 powerplay points, 9 fewer than Mo Seider. Now let's put it all together. He's a net negative at even strength, he'll get scored on much more often than he'll score. He's also worse than our own internal PP quarterback, and that's the BEST part of his game. And he does ALL THAT for one of the worst contracts in the league. He's horrible and SY would be retarded to trade for him. Edited July 17 by kipwinger 1 2 HockeytownUW, town123 and Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 315 Report post Posted July 17 2 hours ago, kipwinger said: Apparently it's time for my yearly reminder that Erik Karlsson isn't any good. I'm not really sure why I have to keep telling everyone this. We can prove this, statistically. He scored 53 total points. He had 38 even strength points and got SCORED ON 62 times, accounting for his whopping -24 +/-. So that means he only scored 15 powerplay points, 9 fewer than Mo Seider. Now let's put it all together. He's a net negative at even strength, he'll get scored on much more often than he'll score. He's also worse than our own internal PP quarterback, and that's the BEST part of his game. And he does ALL THAT for one of the worst contracts in the league. He's horrible and SY would be retarded to trade for him. But what if EK65 is paired with EdvinGod77? Norse Mythology may very well have 2 new legends worthy of their tales of greatness shared by village elders for generations! 1 Jimmybigrigs69 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimmybigrigs69 467 Report post Posted July 17 1 hour ago, Motor City Mullets said: But what if EK65 is paired with EdvinGod77? Norse Mythology may very well have 2 new legends worthy of their tales of greatness shared by village elders for generations! We can fix him 1 kipwinger reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted July 17 Intriguing name out of Columbus: Yegor Chinakhov. Former 1st round pick that just requested a trade out of CBJ. His career has been sidelined by a series of injuries, but produced about .5 ppg when in the lineup. Has size and a wicked shot. Might be a good "buy low" candidate with some potential uptapped upside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mackel 768 Report post Posted July 17 2 hours ago, kipwinger said: Intriguing name out of Columbus: Yegor Chinakhov. Former 1st round pick that just requested a trade out of CBJ. His career has been sidelined by a series of injuries, but produced about .5 ppg when in the lineup. Has size and a wicked shot. Might be a good "buy low" candidate with some potential uptapped upside. I was going to post something similar... I wonder if he could be had for a 3rd and Tuomisto? Too low? Maybe 1:1 with Berggren going back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted July 17 35 minutes ago, mackel said: I was going to post something similar... I wonder if he could be had for a 3rd and Tuomisto? Too low? Maybe 1:1 with Berggren going back? Yeah, you’re in the right ballpark. Can’t imagine it would cost much. But I wouldn’t expect too much either. He’s basically Dominik Kubalik 2.0 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mackel 768 Report post Posted July 17 1 hour ago, kipwinger said: Yeah, you’re in the right ballpark. Can’t imagine it would cost much. But I wouldn’t expect too much either. He’s basically Dominik Kubalik 2.0 Hey it's a reclamation project... Kubalik was an important trade chip in the Dcat trade... This would be a low risk high reward play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,153 Report post Posted July 17 Would Doug Hamilton help more than EK? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mackel 768 Report post Posted July 18 3 hours ago, LeftWinger said: Would Doug Hamilton help more than EK? EK is spent... bringing him in for future considerations wouldn't even make sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted July 18 13 hours ago, LeftWinger said: Would Doug Hamilton help more than EK? I'm not a Dougie Hamilton fanboy or anything, but he's a MUCH BETTER player than Karlsson. Hamilton gives you the same offense and powerplay expertise but he can actually defend against top players at even strength. That's the problem with Karlsson in a nut shell. He can score a zillion points, but only if you play him 20 mins a night. And if you play him 20 mins a night he'll get scored on even more than he scores...which is a lot. Hamilton doesn't have that problem. 13 hours ago, mackel said: Hey it's a reclamation project... Kubalik was an important trade chip in the Dcat trade... This would be a low risk high reward play. I agree. He's also a pretty stout guy too, so even through he brings "soft skill" it's more of the Daniel Sprong variety than the Jonatan Berggren variety. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,153 Report post Posted July 18 3 hours ago, kipwinger said: I'm not a Dougie Hamilton fanboy or anything, but he's a MUCH BETTER player than Karlsson. Hamilton gives you the same offense and powerplay expertise but he can actually defend against top players at even strength. That's the problem with Karlsson in a nut shell. He can score a zillion points, but only if you play him 20 mins a night. And if you play him 20 mins a night he'll get scored on even more than he scores...which is a lot. Hamilton doesn't have that problem. Hamilton is the play then. I am hoping each morning I wake up that I see some news! 3 hours ago, kipwinger said: I agree. He's also a pretty stout guy too, so even through he brings "soft skill" it's more of the Daniel Sprong variety than the Jonatan Berggren variety I say take the risk. We could use 30 goals next to Larkin and Raymond. I'd even throw in a draft pick sweetener. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted July 18 58 minutes ago, LeftWinger said: Hamilton is the play then. I am hoping each morning I wake up that I see some news! I say take the risk. We could use 30 goals next to Larkin and Raymond. I'd even throw in a draft pick sweetener. I put some feelers out to CBJ fans on Reddit to learn more about his defensive game and physical game. I know he's not some kind of Tkachuk style "power forward" but if he can use his size to protect pucks, win board battles, and crash the net then he may just be an option with the guys you mentioned. I just don't know enough about his game to know if he's got top line potential, but it's an interesting thought. 1 LeftWinger reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimmybigrigs69 467 Report post Posted July 18 5 hours ago, kipwinger said: I put some feelers out to CBJ fans on Reddit to learn more about his defensive game and physical game. I know he's not some kind of Tkachuk style "power forward" but if he can use his size to protect pucks, win board battles, and crash the net then he may just be an option with the guys you mentioned. I just don't know enough about his game to know if he's got top line potential, but it's an interesting thought. >Red Wings fan here coming in peace. What can you tell me about Chinakov's game? "Welcome fellow redditerino! China is a heckin' good mid 6 forward. His style could be described as sort of how OSU played the strong safety position during the urban meyer era. Heckin lanky boi, but more for coverage than physical run stopping if that makes sense." EDIT: Wow thanks for the gold kind stranger! 2 kipwinger and Akakabuto reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimmybigrigs69 467 Report post Posted Tuesday at 08:20 PM Rossi and the Wild are at a total impasse apparently. Not even speaking or negotiating. Anyone know what Minny would want in return? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,771 Report post Posted Tuesday at 08:30 PM (edited) 10 minutes ago, Jimmybigrigs69 said: Rossi and the Wild are at a total impasse apparently. Not even speaking or negotiating. Anyone know what Minny would want in return? You'd have to imagine not very much considering the cause of the impasse is that Minny management don't believe Rossi is a top of the lineup player despite his point totals (according to reports). If that's true then I'd imagine you'd have to give them a comparable bottom six roster player and a B-level prospect (given that Rossi is cost controlled). I think something centered around Compher/Berggren and a prospect would do it. Edited Tuesday at 08:31 PM by kipwinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,153 Report post Posted Wednesday at 12:28 PM 16 hours ago, Jimmybigrigs69 said: Rossi and the Wild are at a total impasse apparently. Not even speaking or negotiating. Anyone know what Minny would want in return? He can be the future considerations in the Tarasenko deal. 15 hours ago, kipwinger said: You'd have to imagine not very much considering the cause of the impasse is that Minny management don't believe Rossi is a top of the lineup player despite his point totals (according to reports). If that's true then I'd imagine you'd have to give them a comparable bottom six roster player and a B-level prospect (given that Rossi is cost controlled). I think something centered around Compher/Berggren and a prospect would do it. Shoot, we already gave them Tarasenko, just add a couple more pieces. 1 Motor City Mullets reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 315 Report post Posted Wednesday at 01:36 PM 1 hour ago, LeftWinger said: He can be the future considerations in the Tarasenko deal. Shoot, we already gave them Tarasenko, just add a couple more pieces. I'd send them Berggren or Rasmountain if they wanted a roster player in return...Looks like Rossi's production is trending upwards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jimmybigrigs69 467 Report post Posted Wednesday at 06:13 PM Russo said on his podcast Minny was offered two 1sts for Rossi at the draft and they declined. Guerin doesnt want any futures, and would want to replace Rossi's 60 pts on the roster imedeately. Don't think this trade is possible for us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diehardredwingsfan58 165 Report post Posted Wednesday at 06:23 PM Let's get Dougie Hamilton and Homeboy Bryan Rust.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 315 Report post Posted Thursday at 04:08 PM (edited) 21 hours ago, diehardredwingsfan58 said: Let's get Dougie Hamilton and Homeboy Bryan Rust.. Hamilton age 32 with 3 yrs at $9 Rust age 33 with 3yrs at $5.125 I would not mind them being added to our roster, but they're at the end of their respective careers (Hamilton often injured) and carry a big cap hit. Yzerman should send NJ/Pitt draft picks, a prospect/s, player/s who won't likely be a Red Wing much longer ie Berggren....Doing both clubs a favor taking on their aging vets. Edited Thursday at 04:09 PM by Motor City Mullets Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diehardredwingsfan58 165 Report post Posted Thursday at 08:08 PM 3 hours ago, Motor City Mullets said: Hamilton age 32 with 3 yrs at $9 Rust age 33 with 3yrs at $5.125 I would not mind them being added to our roster, but they're at the end of their respective careers (Hamilton often injured) and carry a big cap hit. Yzerman should send NJ/Pitt draft picks, a prospect/s, player/s who won't likely be a Red Wing much longer ie Berggren....Doing both clubs a favor taking on their aging vets. While they'd help us short term, We do need better long term solutions. 1 Motor City Mullets reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mackel 768 Report post Posted Thursday at 09:25 PM 1 hour ago, diehardredwingsfan58 said: While they'd help us short term, We do need better long term solutions. I don't want either of those guys... we need to identify players who are underused on their current team and swing a deal. No more 30 something guys who won't contribute much 2 years from now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 315 Report post Posted Thursday at 09:45 PM 17 minutes ago, mackel said: I don't want either of those guys... we need to identify players who are underused on their current team and swing a deal. No more 30 something guys who won't contribute much 2 years from now. Agreed - however finding these guys, or having to pay fair market value will be tough...Robertson will likely command a player like Raymond in return...Not sure what Rossi would cost us, but I'm sure he won't come cheap...Who else is out there (saw Sprong signing a 1 yr deal with CSKA Moscow)... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites