Leaderboard

Shift happens.

The Detroit Red Wings: Eh, we'll get 'em in the third.

I decided to post on HFboards... All the best, HFBoards

There never is a bad time to blame Dan O'halloran for a loss.

This team is going to be the death of me. I swear to god.

Smells of 07-08.

When he didnt shoot right away, I was thinking "WHAT ARE YOU DOINGGGGG!!" Moral of the story. Never question Nick.

He did that just to upset you.

This is what happens when you have the best defenseman on earth.

uydgfbsadkjghad;ofighei;ogh qe;iogh eiorhg;oiqh

I honestly fail to see how Miller deserves a spot at all. Eaves should not be sat and Miller is redundant.

I always liked Bert as a Wing. I was happy when we signed him again because I had a real good feeling that on his end, he signed because he knew leaving was a mistake. Translation: he wouldn't be taking this for granted. He proved it last year and he's proving it even more this year. No better place than Detroit to find redemption and I hope he wins a Cup here. You can tell he's playing for that Cup, maybe this year even more than last. I love the effort he's made and I couldn't be happier to have him as a Wing.

Cue the Blue Oyster Bar music.

I'm still not seeing how that's any different from how it would be here if the Wings lost a game that way.

Why? I'm sure they sound like whiny ass ******* after a loss like that, just like we do here when it happens to the Wings.

Oh, for sure. I'm not joking when I say that I never question anything that Lidstrom does; because he's virtually perfect, I stow any judgment on my part and assume that everything he does is correct.

*ahem* For your sake, don't ever go to Vegas...

that should be an extra 2 on Iginla.

And to think you were the one who "eluded" to me as a possible troll...if you seriously can't see what I was referring to, I suggest you re-read your post. I doubt you really are having a hard time comprehending what I'm saying though... probably just being a egocentric *******. On the off chance you really are confused though (which is a very real possibility due to your obvious confusion with the English language while trying to sound more intelligent than you really are over the internet) I've answered your questions.

1) It is obvious sarcasm. How one can not comprehend something this obvious is beyond me. 2) Have I argued that Hudler's poor play should be excused? No, I simply said that calling his decision stupid is something a third party cannot really say. For all we know, it may really be all about the money for happy Huds. I'm starting to think the first few lines of your last post were serious. 3) http://www.diffen.com/difference/Allude_vs_Elude

I was more arguing the fact that you said Hudler's decision was dumb. From your opin ion it may have been, but like I said, we don't know whether or not he regrets HIS choice. Internet names on a sports discussion forum = Serious Business. Since you seem so uptight about formalities here, I suggest you learn to use "whose" instead of a contraction of "who is". Posters who have similar standards for an internet forum clearly demand it.

Nope, it's the hat! esteef

Babcocks hair would hop off his head and pimp slap all 3 of those guys. If I was the goalie I would have been pissed.

Condolences to the Burns family. Hockey lost a great one. I can only hope the HHoF feels shame for not giving Pat Burns his due before he hit the dirt. Shame on them.

exactly. as long as Lids knows he can play at his standard of greatness, bring him back until he himself calls it quits.