Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Tomas Kopecky


  • Please log in to reply
67 replies to this topic

#1 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:18 PM

Well, I know most of you around here thought Tomas Kopecky was useless as a Wing, and would never become anything. Some of you may remember those of us who did think he could be good suggesting that he could or would likely develop into a second line power forward.

Just thought I would bring up some current stats:

32 GP, 3g-15a-18pt, tied for 96th in forward scoring (places him as a second line forward , offensively), 26 takeaways (tied for 16th)

Any thoughts?

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#2 #19=Legend

#19=Legend

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 706 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:21 PM

HES A BUM!!! no but seriously. He just didnt fit right with the Wings. I think the Wings are better off without him. I dont see anybody on our current roster that i would replace for him... except maybe hudler. <_<

#3 Shaman

Shaman

    Die hard Red Wing fan and realist.

  • Silver Booster
  • 3,841 posts
  • Location:Kalamazoo Michigan (WMU)

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:27 PM

Doing better than flip.
Feuer und Wasser kommt nicht zusammen
Kann man nicht binden sind nicht verwandt
In Funken versunken steh ich in Flammen
und bin im Wasser verbrannt
Im Wasser verbrannt

#4 crotty99

crotty99

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,985 posts
  • Location:Perth, Western Australia

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:27 PM

He has been lucky enough to play with the Hawks very best players for a lot of the year ie. Hossa,Toews,Kane, Sharp etc. I think anyone would eventually put up points given those line mates.

In games that I have been able to watch, he was always the weak link on their top line.

Not to take anything away from the guy, but it's not like he's improved tremendously since leaving us, he's just been given great line mates and ridiculous minutes on a depth depleted team.

Posted Image


Thanks TeeMan!


#5 hockey23

hockey23

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 330 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:32 PM

He's still terrible. He can't stay on his skates if he's touched and makes some bad decisions with the puck. I think any player can run into a few points when playing on the top 2 lines and getting power play time, but it doesn't mean he's a good player or that he's the one producing those points.

#6 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:36 PM

Well, I know most of you around here thought Tomas Kopecky was useless as a Wing, and would never become anything. Some of you may remember those of us who did think he could be good suggesting that he could or would likely develop into a second line power forward.

Just thought I would bring up some current stats:

32 GP, 3g-15a-18pt, tied for 96th in forward scoring (places him as a second line forward , offensively), 26 takeaways (tied for 16th)

Any thoughts?


Kopecky got a lot of his points early in the season, when he was playing on the top line and Hossa was scoring at a torrid pace. In the last 25 games, Kopecky has ten points and is a -15, despite often playing top-six minutes with good linemates.

Edited by Crymson, 16 December 2010 - 10:53 PM.


#7 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,738 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:44 PM

I say he's still a bum.

Those points aren't really that impressive considering how he's played a lot of minutes with star forwards as his linemates. He should actually have more points.

Eva is already preparing such a thread for Hudler, once he gets traded.
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#8 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:50 PM

I say he's still a bum.


I say so, too. Further, I say that while eva is probably a nice guy, he's also got an unhealthy fixation on being "right". In this case--as with others--he's willing to twist the stats in order to have the chance to say "See? I was right."

No offense, eva, but there's no reason for that.

Edited by Crymson, 16 December 2010 - 10:51 PM.


#9 GMRwings1983

GMRwings1983

    The Killer is Me

  • Silver Booster
  • 20,738 posts
  • Location:Jerkwater, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:58 PM

I say so, too. Further, I say that while eva is probably a nice guy, he's also got an unhealthy fixation on being "right". In this case--as with others--he's willing to twist the stats in order to have the chance to say "See? I was right."

No offense, eva, but there's no reason for that.


Didn't you start a Quincey thread a few weeks ago for the same reason?
According to my profile, my reputation is excellent. LOL.

#10 Heroes of Hockeytown

Heroes of Hockeytown

    Big Goal Bob

  • Bronze Booster
  • 13,729 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 10:59 PM

Probably the only Wing at this point I'd swap him for is Hudler. Although lil' Jiri seems to be remembering how to play hockey lately, so maybe not.
"We've been in the same spot all year long. We won 50 games for the fourth year in a row. People think we're just hum-drum and boring.
No, you know what we are, we're good. You can't do what we do every single day and not be good." - Mike Babcock

#11 titanium2

titanium2

    Asha... I want I want!!!

  • Bronze Booster
  • 10,495 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:04 PM

:lol:

#12 VM1138

VM1138

    Legend

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,518 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:08 PM

Kopecky is still useless. There's a reason nobody roots for him, not even Chicago fans. He's obviously good enough to play in the NHL and not get sent down, but I'd keep him as a 4th liner, 3rd liner on a bad team. He's benefitted from playing with the Hoss and such.
Check out my short e-book on the Red Wings' 1937 Stanley Cup championship entitled: "Nothing Could Keep 'Em Down." Please download it from my profile at Smashwords: https://www.smashwor...ile/view/victor

New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.

#13 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:08 PM

I say so, too. Further, I say that while eva is probably a nice guy, he's also got an unhealthy fixation on being "right". In this case--as with others--he's willing to twist the stats in order to have the chance to say "See? I was right."

No offense, eva, but there's no reason for that.


Twist? What stats did I twist?

I simply pointed out that Kopecky was posting strong offensive numbers, and had an excellent takeaway stat (as that seems to be universally deemed by this board as the indicator of your defensive ability) and reminded everyone that he had been written off by this board.

I twisted nothing.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#14 Broken 16

Broken 16

    Bonecrushing Blueliner

  • Gold Booster
  • 2,959 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:22 PM

Ya. Kopecky has decent numbers on the Hawks. Only illustrates how awful the Hawks are imo. Kopecky still sucks.

#15 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:23 PM


Twist? What stats did I twist?

I simply pointed out that Kopecky was posting strong offensive numbers, and had an excellent takeaway stat (as that seems to be universally deemed by this board as the indicator of your defensive ability) and reminded everyone that he had been written off by this board.

I twisted nothing.


You noted Kopecky's points as if they indicated offensive ability, and you listed his position amongst all scorers for the same reason. I know you, eva; you're complete in your research. You no doubt knew that a huge number of Kopecky's points came in the early part of the season.

Also, +/- is an important indicator of defensive ability, and Kopecky's is horrible.

Didn't you start a Quincey thread a few weeks ago for the same reason?


Nope. I didn't have an initial opinion on Quincey.

#16 Buppy

Buppy

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:27 PM

Twist? What stats did I twist?

I simply pointed out that Kopecky was posting strong offensive numbers, and had an excellent takeaway stat (as that seems to be universally deemed by this board as the indicator of your defensive ability) and reminded everyone that he had been written off by this board.

I twisted nothing.

Funny how you left out that he's -9. :ph34r:

#17 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:36 PM

Funny how you left out that he's -9. :ph34r:


Plus minus is a worthless statistic. If Cleary dumps the puck in for a line change and goes to the bench, but Seabrook falls at the blue line, so Helm instead of heading to the bench goes and gets the puck, then puts in in front where Datsyuk scores...what happens statistically?

Or if a forward dumps the puck in near the goaltender and goes to the bench, but the goaltender has already passed the puck up to his teammates, and they end up scoring a goal? The player who made a huge error in judgement is spared a minus, but his teammates who had to try and make up for his mistake all get minuses, even the guy who just stepped on the ice.

Wonderful stat. Almost as useless as the GWG.

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#18 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:45 PM

Plus minus is a worthless statistic. If Cleary dumps the puck in for a line change and goes to the bench, but Seabrook falls at the blue line, so Helm instead of heading to the bench goes and gets the puck, then puts in in front where Datsyuk scores...what happens statistically?

Or if a forward dumps the puck in near the goaltender and goes to the bench, but the goaltender has already passed the puck up to his teammates, and they end up scoring a goal? The player who made a huge error in judgement is spared a minus, but his teammates who had to try and make up for his mistake all get minuses, even the guy who just stepped on the ice.

Wonderful stat. Almost as useless as the GWG.


He has ten points and is a -15 in 25 games. That's telling, eva.

#19 eva unit zero

eva unit zero

    Save the Princess...Save the World

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,734 posts

Posted 16 December 2010 - 11:56 PM

He has ten points and is a -15 in 25 games. That's telling, eva.


As I said before, plus/minus is a worthless statistic. It can be affected positively or negatively without a player having any effect on the play.

Datsyuk wins the faceoff, passes to Zetterberg, Z shoots and scores. Homer, Lidstrom, and Stuart all get pluses also. Most of the opposing team's players wouldn't have had any chance to affect the play, yet they get a minus.

Tell me Crymson, what makes it such a wonderful stat when there's no way of telling how much effect a player actually has on it?

"I've never seen a warlock do that without his magic."
"I once devoured a monk's soul. It tasted like chocolate."

#20 GoWings1905

GoWings1905

    Legend

  • Gold Booster
  • 5,273 posts

Posted 17 December 2010 - 12:05 AM

There isn't a forward on the Red Wings roster right now I would want replaced by Kopecky. Remember the fourth line of Kopecky-Draper-Maltby? I can't recall a more useless line.

Besides, what does that say about the Blackhawks if they are relying on Tomas frickin Kopecky to produce offensively?
 
 
"To whom much is given, much is expected."
 
 

 

 

 

 






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users