It's just one game. Can we please not fly off the handle after game 1? We still have a solid team and the layoff has alot to do with it. Keep in mind most of our guys didnt play a whole hell of alot during the lockout.....Jeezus what is it with you ppl already counting us out?
Everyone chill out!
#1
Posted 20 January 2013 - 03:22 AM
#2
Posted 20 January 2013 - 05:29 AM
It's just one game. Can we please not fly off the handle after game 1? We still have a solid team and the layoff has alot to do with it. Keep in mind most of our guys didnt play a whole hell of alot during the lockout.....Jeezus what is it with you ppl already counting us out?
How about speaking for yourself? After watching the "highlights" I think there is an obvious reason for some of the concerns, the sky may not nbe falling but you can't have too many games like this in a shortened high intense season.
DRW had gotten away with good - average goaltending because of a great defense playing in front of them, if the D doesn't pick it up it might get ugly. My personal opinion going into this half season is simple: transistion year(s) so everything can happyen.
Edited by frankgrimes, 20 January 2013 - 05:37 AM.
- Nev likes this

Thank you so much perfect human being #5
Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!
N ational
#3
Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:21 AM
It's just one game. Can we please not fly off the handle after game 1? We still have a solid team and the layoff has alot to do with it. Keep in mind most of our guys didnt play a whole hell of alot during the lockout.....Jeezus what is it with you ppl already counting us out?
Flying off the handle after one game is what we do best. We also specialize in throwing people under the proverbial bus after two games.
On a more "serious" note - "You have to remember, most of our guys didn't play a lot during the lockout" is a very lame excuse. No offense, of course. Just sayin'.
- Nev likes this
#4
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:28 AM
1) Its LGW, we've always had our share of chicken lickens, just like the rest of teh interwebz.
2)
? We still have a solid team and the layoff has alot to do with it. Keep in mind most of our guys didnt play a whole hell of alot during the lockout.
No, we have a team with an aging core of stars and a whole bunch of question marks through the rest of the roster. The layoff is no excuse, it was the same for both teams, and the guys on our roster who have their game legs (Dats, Z, Brunner, Smith) did just as little as the rest.
As others have said, this is a team in transition and I think we'll see plenty of Jekyll and Hyde from this squad the rest of the season.
#5
Posted 20 January 2013 - 08:53 AM
Backes set the tone and we didn't answer.
- Dominator2005 likes this
#6
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:05 AM
Backes set the tone and we didn't answer.</p></blockquote>
Backes just sent a message to western conference... "how to play against Detroit" for the dummies edition
#7
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:06 AM
Backes set the tone and we didn't answer.
Didn't answer? Heck, we didn't even know what the question was.
I'm not saying the sky is falling, but it is a bit foggy out.
- kylee, Nev, Motown4013 and 1 other like this
My money on the board pledge:
$1 for each goal scored by a player after whom I have named a hamster.
An additional $5 for each hat trick scored by a player after whom I have named a hamster.
An additional $10 if any of the above goals is the GWG goal that gives us the series win.
An additional $50 if it is the GWG that wins us the Cup.
$5 for a SO by Jimmy.
Hamsters' names (current players in RED): Henrik Pavel Tomas Nicklas Dominik
Niklas Matthieu Daniel Robert
Johan Andreas Valtteri Jonathan
Andrew Patrick Ian Todd
And introducing: Jordin Damien Gustav James
TOTAL SO FAR: $36
#8
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
#9
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:27 AM
Didn't answer? Heck, we didn't even know what the question was.
I'm not saying the sky is falling, but it is a bit foggy out.
The question was:
BLUES: We're going to kick your ass, so what are you going to do about it?
WINGS: *crickets*
#10
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:33 AM
Very hard to watch but hopefully that type of game for them will make them work hard at improving very fast.
#11
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:41 AM
The Wings play badly and floated [insert your own joke here] because "they have not been playing in a while, they have new faces, they have a new coach, they [insert excuse/reason here]." OK. The other team has the same situation, typically. What is it about the Wings that makes them disappear in statement games like last night's?
I am certainly not throwing them under the bus, but it's a logical question: If they are rusty and don't have their game legs, and all the other teams have been under the same restrictions and also haven't played -- how come other teams play well and hand the Wings their jock straps in games like last night's? Ew.
Of course they will get better - could hardly be worse - but I just have to wonder in my out-loud voice what, if anything, they were thinking, with that performance.
- Dominator2005 and 55fan like this
#12
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:49 AM
Guys one data point does not make a trend. Wait until we have a few more games to judge the team.
#13
Posted 20 January 2013 - 09:55 AM
Guys one data point does not make a trend. Wait until we have a few more games to judge the team.
Oh I totally agree. I'm expecting a totally different team (I hope) next game or the fans at the Joe may just boo their butts off the ice at the home opener.
- puckloo39 likes this
#14
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:03 AM
I really don't understand the point of reaching for the hemlock after one game.
#15
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:27 AM
I really don't understand the point of reaching for the hemlock after one game.
"I drank what????"
-Socrates
As far as nobody being killed, I think chances are that Mursak just had his season killed last night:
No word yet on extent of Jan Mursak's shoulder injury but his arm was in sling and Ken Holland said he is out for a while.
https://twitter.com/...004431195242498
Money of the Board-2013 Playoff Edition: Current $33 ($5 per series win {1}, $5 per series sweep, $5 per Kronwalling {2}, $2 per Jimmy shutout or fight {1}, $2 per Tootoo goal or fight, $2 per Mule or Brunner goal {8})
#16
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:49 AM
People are concerned and rightfully so. We didn't just lose. We got absolutely destroyed in every aspect of the game. Not only that, but the biggest question mark we all had coming into this season, how our defense would perform minus Lids, was clearly and terrifingly answered.
If we had lost 4-2 and put up a fight the alert level would still be up because it is LGW after all. But it wouldn't be anywhere near were it is at now. It is very hard to just excuse this as being "one game".
#17
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:20 AM
"I drank what????"
-Socrates
As far as nobody being killed, I think chances are that Mursak just had his season killed last night:
No word yet on extent of Jan Mursak's shoulder injury but his arm was in sling and Ken Holland said he is out for a while.
Well, that solves the roster problem.
If we had lost 4-2 and put up a fight the alert level would still be up because it is LGW after all. But it wouldn't be anywhere near were it is at now. It is very hard to just excuse this as being "one game".
What choice do you have?
#18
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:28 AM
I'm confused. If I'm understanding things correctly going off of what many here are saying, the Wings were the only team locked out? Is that right? So we're the only team going through this, so nothing to worry about? St. Louis wasn't literally in the exact same boat as we were? They didn't have the exact same number of guys playing in leagues as us? And again, weren't locked out?
Just checking.
#19
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:31 AM
The Wings play badly and floated [insert your own joke here] because "they have not been playing in a while, they have new faces, they have a new coach, they [insert excuse/reason here]." OK. The other team has the same situation, typically. What is it about the Wings that makes them disappear in statement games like last night's?
I am certainly not throwing them under the bus, but it's a logical question: If they are rusty and don't have their game legs, and all the other teams have been under the same restrictions and also haven't played -- how come other teams play well and hand the Wings their jock straps in games like last night's? Ew.
People are concerned and rightfully so. We didn't just lose. We got absolutely destroyed in every aspect of the game. Not only that, but the biggest question mark we all had coming into this season, how our defense would perform minus Lids, was clearly and terrifingly answered.
If we had lost 4-2 and put up a fight the alert level would still be up because it is LGW after all. But it wouldn't be anywhere near were it is at now. It is very hard to just excuse this as being "one game".
Of course they will get better - could hardly be worse - but I just have to wonder in my out-loud voice what, if anything, they were thinking, with that performance.
"I drank what????"
-Socrates
As far as nobody being killed, I think chances are that Mursak just had his season killed last night:
No word yet on extent of Jan Mursak's shoulder injury but his arm was in sling and Ken Holland said he is out for a while.
Bring in Goose
#20
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:34 AM
I really don't understand the point of reaching for the hemlock after one game.
I think Babcock was reaching for Holland's neck in his dreams last night.
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sens Karlsson suffers lacerated Achilles tendon |
General Discussion | Hockeytown0001 |
|
|
|
IF Everyone gets healthy... |
General Discussion | DSM |
|
|
|
Everyone's favorite blind lawyer hit by bike in NYC
|
Water Cooler | FireCaptain |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















