Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Ericsson for Courturier?


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#1 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,938 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:31 AM

Just an out of the box thought. philly is willing to move SC according to all the rumor sites. looking for a proven scorer or a top pair Dmen.

if this is true-who really knows, this move might make some sense. We move a 28/29 year old Dman making 3.25 million with 1 year left on his contract. we pick up a 20 year old 6-3/200 pound C that everyone says will be a point per game guy in a couple of years. SC would become the insurence if/when Datsyuk leaves.

yes i understand that this move may hurt us this season. but for the next 10-12 it would make us better and give us the future building block we need.

Crazy i know......



#2 Crymson

Crymson

    Ninjelephant

  • Gold Booster
  • 11,032 posts
  • Location:Denver, CO, USA

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:33 AM

Just an out of the box thought. philly is willing to move SC according to all the rumor sites. looking for a proven scorer or a top pair Dmen.

if this is true-who really knows, this move might make some sense. We move a 28/29 year old Dman making 3.25 million with 1 year left on his contract. we pick up a 20 year old 6-3/200 pound C that everyone says will be a point per game guy in a couple of years. SC would become the insurence if/when Datsyuk leaves.

yes i understand that this move may hurt us this season. but for the next 10-12 it would make us better and give us the future building block we need.

Crazy i know......

 

Getting rid of our one and only shutdown defenseman, who is improving by the season, seems like a poor idea---especially for an unproven forward. You'll need to point me at the people who say that Courtourier will be a PPG player soon, because I have never seen anybody say that. If Philly feels that he's got the potential to be their next first-line winger, then he'll be untouchable. But I get the feeling that you're exaggerating.

 

Edit: He's got only nine points in 33 games so far, and his -12 is second-worst on the team. Not very encouraging.


Edited by Crymson, 02 April 2013 - 11:37 AM.


#3 matt198913

matt198913

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,973 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:36 AM

I would think they would want Smith or even Sproul.


BINGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#4 MasterPavel

MasterPavel

    3rd Line Checker

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 400 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:38 AM

No matter what anyone else tells you, I enjoy your sarcasm Crymson.

#5 Hockey13Playa

Hockey13Playa

    Here's my card.

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:39 AM

Unless hell freezes over Philadelphia would never do that trade... EVER! I would love to get Courturier but its going to cost a pretty penny for one, and for two I doubt they want big E. If they did we would have to include more in this trade.


Posted Image


#6 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:43 AM

A better deal would be Mrazek and Ouellet for Courturier. They want goalie and defensive depth.

 

I don't care if he's struggling his sophmore year, he's still extremely young and provides a good effort to go along with size.

 

At the very least he's a direct upgrade over Abdelkader, at the very best he's a 6'2 franchise center that will spark our scoring wingers for years to come.

 

I would absolutely love it.

 

#7 nyqvististhefuture

nyqvististhefuture

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,268 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:47 AM

A better deal would be Mrazek and Ouellet for Courturier. They want goalie and defensive depth.

 

I don't care if he's struggling his sophmore year, he's still extremely young and provides a good effort to go along with size.

 

At the very least he's a direct upgrade over Abdelkader, at the very best he's a 6'2 franchise center that will spark our scoring wingers for years to come.

 

I would absolutely love it.

 

 

mrazek and ouellet??? no offense but your f*cken crazy ... mrazek has the potential to be a star goalie and ouellet a valuable all around defensemen ...and flyers will only trade couturier in a package deal if they can get a top forward like bobby ryan (dregger mentioned it yesterday)


Edited by nyqvististhefuture, 02 April 2013 - 11:48 AM.


#8 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:49 AM

mrazek and ouellet??? no offense but your f*cken crazy, mrazek has the potential to be a star goalie and ouellet a valuable all around defensemen ...and flyers will only trade couturier in a package deal if they can get a top forward like bobby ryan (dregger mentioned it yesterday)

 

And Couturier has the potential to be a star forward. The difference is Courturier actually has proven to be an NHL player by the age of 19.



#9 nyqvististhefuture

nyqvististhefuture

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,268 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:51 AM

And Couturier has the potential to be a star forward. The difference is Courturier actually has proven to be an NHL player by the age of 19.

 

 

umm no thanks you dont trade away goalies of mrazek's caliber



#10 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:55 AM

umm no thanks you dont trade away goalies of mrazek's caliber

 

I love Mrazek I really do. But Jimmy is here for the foreseeable future. Adding young big forward to our line up will make us a more effective team for the next 4-5 years, and Couturier has all the potential in the world to be a great player.

 

I don't see the downside, we lose a blue chip goalie, for a blue chip forward. The difference is we actually have a good goalie that will be here for a while, while our forward depth looks pretty barren for bigger top 6 caliber prospects.

 

Now unless you think Mrazek will step in next year if we let Howard go, I don't see how this deal doesn't look appealing.



#11 ben_usmc

ben_usmc

    Kenny Powers Fan

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,818 posts
  • Location:ypsilanti

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:03 PM

I love Mrazek I really do. But Jimmy is here for the foreseeable future. Adding young big forward to our line up will make us a more effective team for the next 4-5 years, and Couturier has all the potential in the world to be a great player.

 

I don't see the downside, we lose a blue chip goalie, for a blue chip forward. The difference is we actually have a good goalie that will be here for a while, while our forward depth looks pretty barren for bigger top 6 caliber prospects.

 

Now unless you think Mrazek will step in next year if we let Howard go, I don't see how this deal doesn't look appealing.

Mrazek is going to be the back up in about 2 years, then once Howards contract start coming to an end, they will probably split until Mrazek slowly takes over.


There's no I in team, but there's a U in c***, so don't be little jealous c***s

#12 JPT

JPT

    Rookie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 117 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:03 PM

umm no thanks you dont trade away goalies of mrazek's caliber

 

Pretty much everyone is tradeable. A center with size, the ability to step into the NHL at 19 and with such a high ceiling is well worth a top end G prospect. Ultimately Howard is the goalie for the next 5 years at least which makes Mrazek expendable. Is Courturier worth it? I'm not educated enough to say. But Mrazek is definitely tradeable.



#13 nyqvististhefuture

nyqvististhefuture

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,268 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:08 PM

I love Mrazek I really do. But Jimmy is here for the foreseeable future. Adding young big forward to our line up will make us a more effective team for the next 4-5 years, and Couturier has all the potential in the world to be a great player.

 

I don't see the downside, we lose a blue chip goalie, for a blue chip forward. The difference is we actually have a good goalie that will be here for a while, while our forward depth looks pretty barren for bigger top 6 caliber prospects.

 

Now unless you think Mrazek will step in next year if we let Howard go, I don't see how this deal doesn't look appealing.

 

 

sorry doesnt look appealing ... just because howard is doing well doesnt mean mrazek wont surpass him and we can trade howard in 2-4 yrs  you think if chicago could redo the hasek trade they wouldnt of kept hasek and trade belfour a year or 2 later??

 

sorry mrazek is untouchable hes got the potential to steal a series by himself  , if you wanna trade a goalie prospect its jake patterson



Pretty much everyone is tradeable. A center with size, the ability to step into the NHL at 19 and with such a high ceiling is well worth a top end G prospect. Ultimately Howard is the goalie for the next 5 years at least which makes Mrazek expendable. Is Courturier worth it? I'm not educated enough to say. But Mrazek is definitely tradeable.

 

 

whens the last time we had a true superstar goalie with the wings??? osgood ?? vernon??cheveldae?? hanlon? howard is good but i wouldnt say hes an elite goalie we finally have one in mrazek who can be an elite nhl goalie and you guys wanna ship him off .... no thank you



Mrazek is going to be the back up in about 2 years, then once Howards contract start coming to an end, they will probably split until Mrazek slowly takes over.

 

 

if anything in 3-4 yrs we can get a nice return back for howard when mrazek is ready for fulltime duties



#14 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:14 PM

whens the last time we had a true superstar goalie with the wings??? osgood ?? vernon??cheveldae?? hanlon? howard is good but i wouldnt say hes an elite goalie we finally have one in mrazek who can be an elite nhl goalie and you guys wanna ship him off .... no thank you

 

The odds of Mrazek becoming better than Howard are low. Very low.

 

What's an elite goalie? would top 5 in SV% and GAA be elite? Because if that's not elite then their isn't an NHL goalie that is elite.



#15 WorkingOvertime

WorkingOvertime

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,422 posts
  • Location:Columbus, OH

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:23 PM

Just an out of the box thought. philly is willing to move SC according to all the rumor sites. looking for a proven scorer or a top pair Dmen.

if this is true-who really knows, this move might make some sense. We move a 28/29 year old Dman making 3.25 million with 1 year left on his contract. we pick up a 20 year old 6-3/200 pound C that everyone says will be a point per game guy in a couple of years. SC would become the insurence if/when Datsyuk leaves.

yes i understand that this move may hurt us this season. but for the next 10-12 it would make us better and give us the future building block we need.

Crazy i know......

And which of Nyquist, Tatar, Sproul, 1st round pick, etc. will the Wings be adding to the trade (and likely more)?  It would take more than E to get the trade done.



#16 nyqvististhefuture

nyqvististhefuture

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,268 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:35 PM

The odds of Mrazek becoming better than Howard are low. Very low.

 

What's an elite goalie? would top 5 in SV% and GAA be elite? Because if that's not elite then their isn't an NHL goalie that is elite.

 

ya VERY LOW :sigh:  He dominated the world juniors and gave some stellar performances .... hes playing great in the ahl in his first season , played great in his first nhl game and he just turned 21 .... hes way ahead of what jimmy howard was when he was this age your fooling yourself if you say otherwise

 

an elite goalie is a goalie who is the most valuable player to there team , he takes his team to the next level and can win series by themselves (lundqvist,renne) howard is good and hes more important to our success with lidstrom gone  but datsyuk/zetterberg is more valuable to us and howard hasnt won any series for us by himself and mrazek has that ability



#17 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,530 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:39 PM

No matter what anyone else tells you, I enjoy your sarcasm Crymson.

Indeed...

 

His criticism is certainly unique - even if it's applied to me :lol:



'Evolution' created by Offsides

#18 Z Winged Dangler

Z Winged Dangler

    Part 3: Return of the Hammer Hands

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,198 posts
  • Location:Winnipeg, MB

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:41 PM

A better deal would be Mrazek and Ouellet for Courturier. They want goalie and defensive depth.

 

I don't care if he's struggling his sophmore year, he's still extremely young and provides a good effort to go along with size.

 

At the very least he's a direct upgrade over Abdelkader, at the very best he's a 6'2 franchise center that will spark our scoring wingers for years to come.

 

I would absolutely love it.

 

 That's a huge overpayment.  I wouldn't trade either Ouellet or Mrazek, let alone both for 1 guy.  Couturier is really good, and would fit in well as a Wing, but I honestly wouldn't trade Ouellet alone for him.  Ouellet, Sproul and Backman are the future D on the Wings.


"I play hockey, but I am not very good.  Can someone please tell me what it would take to sign with the Wings ? I can use a million or two."  ~ arag

 

Dan Cleary is an Xbox 360.  While good for a while, it's time for the new generation to take over.


#19 Richdg

Richdg

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,938 posts

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:43 PM

Interesting how this thread is going. The first response is about trading "our only true shutdown defender", then the rest talk about how much more we would have to add to the deal. Agian we have no idea what it would take. E and tatar? sure. There are many possible ways to do this. But if it can be, do it.

Look at things long term. E is a UFA after next season. he is making 3.25 million per now. How much is it going to take to resign him? i would guess 5 years and 25 million. Is E worth 5 million per season? No. he is a 3/4 not a 1/2. With Kronwall, Smith, Kindl, Dekeyser, Lashoff, Q, Sproul, Oullett, Nicasctro, and de haas still in the system, we have plenty of Dmen ready and on the way. More than enough talent to replace E.

Now go look at the forward group. is there a single future #1 C in the group anywhere? No. not even close. In fact some are suggesting we resign Filppula for 4-5 million per as insurance if datsyuk leaves. Courturier on the other hand is a true future #1 C. For the next year+ he would be our #3 behind dat and z. learning the trade with no pressure. In 2 years, if Datsyuk leaves he is our #2. in 3 years our #1.

HF had Courturier rated as an 8.5 prospect. They compare 8's to Spezza, marleu, and Richards. 9's are compared to E Staal and thornton. So Courturier is somewhere in that range, all of which are/where point per game players.

All that being said, will this ever happen? no. Honestly Holland doesn't have the guts anymore to even try.



#20 Carman

Carman

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Riverview, MI

Posted 02 April 2013 - 12:44 PM

ya VERY LOW :sigh:  He dominated the world juniors and gave some stellar performances .... hes playing great in the ahl in his first season , played great in his first nhl game and he just turned 21 .... hes way ahead of what jimmy howard was when he was this age your fooling yourself if you say otherwise

 

an elite goalie is a goalie who is the most valuable player to there team , he takes his team to the next level and can win series by themselves (lundqvist,renne) howard is good and hes more important to our success with lidstrom gone  but datsyuk/zetterberg is more valuable to us and howard hasnt won any series for us by himself and mrazek has that ability

 

Nobody knows that Mrazek has the ability. He has the potential to.

 

Jimmy Howad also dominated the 2002 World Juniors and lead the US to a gold medal. Then he goes back to college hockey and leads his team to a final four championship game and lost the game 1-0. He set league records in college. Jimmy was also the first griffin goalie to be named to the all rookie team, and set several griffin records. Then his first NHL season he gets nominated for a Calder trophy and puts up top 5 SV% and GAA numbers better than Lundqvist, Bryzgalov, Brodeur, Kiprusoff, Rinne, Price, Luongo, Thomas.

 

His career numbers of .917 and 2.42 are not that far off of your elite criteria of .920 and 2.35 for Rinne. Or quick .915 and 2.32. How about Ryan Miller who everyone thought was elite a few years ago with .915 and 2.59.

 

Fact is Howard has proven to be an elite goalie. And he has been elite at every level.

 

No goalie is going to put up great numbers with this current Wing's team. They are awful at turning the puck over, and allow way too many high % chances. The only goalie that would do well would be Hasek, and the odds of Mrazek being Hasek are 1 in a million.







Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users