• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
trule23

Smith and Ericcsson?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Hockey equipment is filthy and I can't imagine putting his hand back in a sweaty glove helped the situation.

Agreed, but you'd think they would've cleaned it and covered it after the fight.

It seems a little odd an infection shows up that fast.

I'm really starting to wonder about the Wings training staff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, but you'd think they would've cleaned it and covered it after the fight.

It seems a little odd an infection shows up that fast.

I'm really starting to wonder about the Wings training staff.

They could have glued him shut with some neosporin, and bandaged the wound shut (awkward placement as it is because the wound was on the knuckle), and all the movement and sweating that occurs in the glove, plus friction against the inside of the glove itself could easily been enough to allow the wound to be exposed to bacteria.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could have glued him shut with some neosporin, and bandaged the wound shut (awkward placement as it is because the wound was on the knuckle), and all the movement and sweating that occurs in the glove, plus friction against the inside of the glove itself could easily been enough to allow the wound to be exposed to bacteria.

True.

I guess I'm just surprised an infection would show up that fast.

And really the crack about the trainers is more about the groin injuries that this team seems particularly susceptible to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking he cut his hand on the helmet and could have gotten sweat or saliva in the wound. I agree that the infection spread pretty fast especially knowing it had to be treated by team docs not long afterwards.

I've cut my knuckles open more than a few times and never had an infection set up, sure gets sore afterwards though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough about putting his hand back into bacteria filled equipment being the reason, but who's the genius who put him back out there?

"We're up 4-0 and you've got an open wound on your hand. Get back out there, chief."

It didn't occur to the training staff that this might happen? At worse, they may have said, "well, it's likely that your hand is already infection from making contact with Foligno's teeth - go out there and make it worse!"

It just feels like it could have been avoided, or handled better, but I know nothing about this kind of thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does there seem to be some sort of weird, pathalogical, need to assign blame to each and every little thing that happens to this team? Smith went back out because he wanted to play, the coach probably wanted him to play, and the folks signing his checks want him to play. A cut on his hand is a minor injury. The kind that hockey players sustain CONSTANTLY throughout a season. Think about all the times that you see blood in the course of a hockey season. All of those are cuts, and all of those have the potential to get infected. Most don't. This one did. It's not anyone's fault. It just happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does there seem to be some sort of weird, pathalogical, need to assign blame to each and every little thing that happens to this team? Smith went back out because he wanted to play, the coach probably wanted him to play, and the folks signing his checks want him to play. A cut on his hand is a minor injury. The kind that hockey players sustain CONSTANTLY throughout a season. Think about all the times that you see blood in the course of a hockey season. All of those are cuts, and all of those have the potential to get infected. Most don't. This one did. It's not anyone's fault. It just happened.

There's not, on my part anyway, but this just seems careless. Considering where the team was at that point in the game, (up by 4, 11 minutes left and 6 mins by the time his penalty was over) he shouldn't have been back out. It was pointless for him to come back out, and now his hand is worse off than it had to be. Whether it's Smith's call, Babs' call or the training staff, it could have been avoided. It's more about the situation than a minor injury that occurs constantly throughout the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's not, on my part anyway, but this just seems careless. Considering where the team was at that point in the game, (up by 4, 11 minutes left and 6 mins by the time his penalty was over) he shouldn't have been back out. It was pointless for him to come back out, and now his hand is worse off than it had to be. Whether it's Smith's call, Babs' call or the training staff, it could have been avoided. It's more about the situation than a minor injury that occurs constantly throughout the season.

You're advocating holding a guy out of the remainder of the game, for a cut on his hand, because there's a possibility of infection?

Can you even think of another time in the last 20 years that a player missed a game due to an infected cut on their hand? That's how unlikely, and flukey, this injury is. To suggest that someone ought to know better (regardless of the score) displays magnificent foresight, hindsight, or (more likely) both.

Athletes want to play. Coaches want them to play. They're not going to sit out for something so unlikely. Can you imagine how deep in Babs' doghouse Smith would be if he sat out the rest of the game because "maybe his hand could get an infection"? Babs' would ******* lose it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're advocating holding a guy out of the remainder of the game, for a cut on his hand, because there's a possibility of infection?

Can you even think of another time in the last 20 years that a player missed a game due to an infected cut on their hand? That's how unlikely, and flukey, this injury is. To suggest that someone ought to know better (regardless of the score) displays magnificent foresight, hindsight, or (more likely) both.

Athletes want to play. Coaches want them to play. They're not going to sit out for something so unlikely. Can you imagine how deep in Babs' doghouse Smith would be if he sat out the rest of the game because "maybe his hand could get an infection"? Babs' wouldf****** lose it.

Yep. I think it could have been handled better - simply just for precautionary measures, beyond the possibility of infection. Considering where they were in the game (which is basically my point, but by all means, keep focusing on the infection aspect and giving me a detailed history on "Fluky Hand Injuries: NHL Coaches and the Players They've Doghoused). Just my opinion on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I think it could have been handled better - simply just for precautionary measures, beyond the possibility of infection. Considering where they were in the game (which is basically my point, but by all means, keep focusing on the infection aspect and giving me a detailed history on "Fluky Hand Injuries: NHL Coaches and the Players They've Doghoused). Just my opinion on it.

I think a more reasonable approach would be to not fight to begin with

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. I think it could have been handled better - simply just for precautionary measures, beyond the possibility of infection. Considering where they were in the game (which is basically my point, but by all means, keep focusing on the infection aspect and giving me a detailed history on "Fluky Hand Injuries: NHL Coaches and the Players They've Doghoused). Just my opinion on it.

So if the score was 4-0 and Smith had taken a high stick that needed stitches, would you have kept him off the ice in that instance too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if the score was 4-0 and Smith had taken a high stick that needed stitches, would you have kept him off the ice in that instance too?

No. I think they could patch him up properly in that instance, and the cut isn't pressed up against sweaty gear. Not to mention, a cut on the cheek, nose, etc (except for maybe his eye) isn't going to impact his play nearly as much as an infection setting in on his hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this