• Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Sign in to follow this  
krsmith17

Top 50 NHL Prospects

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

 

Scott Wheeler just released his top 50 NHL drafted prospects https://theathletic.com/442466/2018/07/27/wheeler-the-top-50-drafted-nhl-prospects-ranking-2018-edition/

The bad news is we only have one player on that list. The good news is that player is ranked number 5.

 

Filip Zadina - "I’m fairly confident the Montreal Canadiens and the Ottawa Senators will grow to regret their Friday night in Dallas, at least quietly. Their loss is the Red Wings’ gain — and they needed it. Despite the team’s desperate need for a rebuild, Zadina is their lone prospect in the top 50. Though I will say this: I really liked their 2018 draft, from Zadina on down to Joe Veleno and Jonatan Berggren. Zadina, more than the three forwards ahead of him on this list, is at his best when the puck’s on his stick and he can create as a primary carrier and option. Both Pettersson and Svechnikov can be dominant off the puck, finishing off plays in a split second. Zadina is electrifying because he scores his goals with that extra touch before he releases it in order to change his angle, a darting lateral cut, or a deke."

It still irks me to see Vilardi so highly regarded by most pundits, ranked number 13 on this list and Rasmussen not crack the top 50... Hopefully Ras really proves everyone wrong over the next couple years and becomes a legit top 6 winger / power-play specialist.

Edited by krsmith17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Dabura said:

Despite the team’s desperate need for a rebuild, Zadina is their lone prospect in the top 50.

Only because you stupidly omitted Rasmussen. But ok.

... and Veleno... Nah, not surprised Veleno isn't there, but he WILL be on this list in his draft +1 year, unlike Rasmussen... :lol:

I agree though, I think Rasmussen should probably be there ahead of a couple guys on this list. I'm okay with him being underrated though, and like I said, hopefully he proves a lot of people wrong, including Scott f***ing Wheeler... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Dallas had taken Veleno at 13, or whatever position he was "supposed to go at" he would be on that list.

Rasmussen not making the list is also extremely suspect.

Just like with draft rankings, most of these ranks are likely super inaccurate relative to where these players actually turn out in the league. But it's fun to look at and cool to see Zadina so high up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, krsmith17 said:

... and Veleno... Nah, not surprised Veleno isn't there, but he WILL be on this list in his draft +1 year, unlike Rasmussen... :lol:

I agree though, I think Rasmussen should probably be there ahead of a couple guys on this list. I'm okay with him being underrated though, and like I said, hopefully he proves a lot of people wrong, including Scott f***ing Wheeler... 

The name Veleno sounds too similar to another player we used to have.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, krsmith17 said:

... and Veleno... Nah, not surprised Veleno isn't there, but he WILL be on this list in his draft +1 year, unlike Rasmussen... :lol:

I agree though, I think Rasmussen should probably be there ahead of a couple guys on this list. I'm okay with him being underrated though, and like I said, hopefully he proves a lot of people wrong, including Scott f***ing Wheeler... 

2 hours ago, ChristopherReevesLegs said:

If Dallas had taken Veleno at 13, or whatever position he was "supposed to go at" he would be on that list.

Rasmussen not making the list is also extremely suspect.

Just like with draft rankings, most of these ranks are likely super inaccurate relative to where these players actually turn out in the league. But it's fun to look at and cool to see Zadina so high up.

yeh.

It's just the way that line is worded, it made me chuckle.

"Despite the team’s desperate need for a rebuild"

The team is rebuilding. It's not a teardown, but it is indeed a rebuild.

"Zadina is their lone prospect in the top 50."

  1. The team committed to a rebuild in the second half of the 2016-17 season; they've had two drafts in their new rebuild era. One of those drafts got them Zadina.
  2. Rasmussen could fit comfortably in this list. Could make a case for Hronek.

Pundits are sophists. Hack frauds, the whole lot of them.

KOBoQG.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Dabura said:

yeh.

It's just the way that line is worded, it made me chuckle.

"Despite the team’s desperate need for a rebuild"

The team is rebuilding. It's not a teardown, but it is indeed a rebuild.

"Zadina is their lone prospect in the top 50."

  1. The team committed to a rebuild in the second half of the 2016-17 season; they've had two drafts in their new rebuild era. One of those drafts got them Zadina.
  2. Rasmussen could fit comfortably in this list. Could make a case for Hronek.

Pundits are sophists. Hack frauds, the whole lot of them.

KOBoQG.gif

It's not a rebuild until we trade or buyout every single player from the "streak". Don't you know how this works??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. The dawgs will likely regret not drafting BPA at #5.

Frankly I liked Veleno as the best center of the draft, despite his mediocre shot, but he or Kotkaniemi I could kind of understand that high, but Hayton...I just don't get that pick at all.

Edited by solarion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there's any question that Hayton was an off the board pick at 5, but it's probably a little too early to say he's going to be a bust... I'm sure there will be quite a few players drafted outside of the top 5 that will be better than him though.

Keep in mind, this is just one man's rankings though. I'm sure there are others that would consider Hayton a top 50 prospect. I doubt many would consider him better than (m)any that went in this year's top 10 though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, krsmith17 said:

I don't think there's any question that Hayton was an off the board pick at 5, but it's probably a little too early to say he's going to be a bust... I'm sure there will be quite a few players drafted outside of the top 5 that will be better than him though.

Keep in mind, this is just one man's rankings though. I'm sure there are others that would consider Hayton a top 50 prospect. I doubt many would consider him better than (m)any that went in this year's top 10 though.

I am not saying that he's the next Stefan, just that I don't think he'll ever turn out to be a good enough player to justify taking him at #5. Especially considering the guys picked after him. If he was picked in the 2nd half of the 1st round, my opinion would be different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, solarion said:

Agree. The dawgs will likely regret not drafting BPA at #5.

Frankly I liked Veleno as the best center of the draft, despite his mediocre shot, but he or Kotkaniemi I could kind of understand that high, but Hayton...I just don't get that pick at all.

Hayton was such Arizona thing to do. Things were looking too sweet so they just had to shoot themselves in the foot. Idk about Hayton busting though... I just don't think you pull a Rasmussen with a top 5 pick. The spread isn't open yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In ARI's defense, they've badly needed an infusion of high-end talent at the center position since time immemorial. I don't know that Hayton is quite what the doctor ordered on that front, but Keller, Strome, Hayton (and maybe Galchenyuk) is a promising collection of young centermen. Pretty similar to our set, actually. Keller~Larkin, Strome~Rasmussen, Hayton~Veleno (and Galchenyuk~Athanasiou).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dabura said:

In ARI's defense, they've badly needed an infusion of high-end talent at the center position since time immemorial. I don't know that Hayton is quite what the doctor ordered on that front, but Keller, Strome, Hayton (and maybe Galchenyuk) is a promising collection of young centermen. Pretty similar to our set, actually. Keller~Larkin, Strome~Rasmussen, Hayton~Veleno (and Galchenyuk~Athanasiou).

But who better? Veleno or Hayton?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, Dabura said:

In ARI's defense, they've badly needed an infusion of high-end talent at the center position since time immemorial. I don't know that Hayton is quite what the doctor ordered on that front, but Keller, Strome, Hayton (and maybe Galchenyuk) is a promising collection of young centermen. Pretty similar to our set, actually. Keller~Larkin, Strome~Rasmussen, Hayton~Veleno (and Galchenyuk~Athanasiou).

Truedat, but they also need guys that can finish. To leave Zadina on the board to take Hayton at #5 is just stoopid. This is a team that managed even to outstink the Wings in GF last year. ...yuck. Take. The. Shooter.

If Galchenyuk gets even a whiff of success at center in the desert, I'm expecting riots in Montreal.

Edited by solarion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this