Blueliner 69 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 They need to win. Howard has looked terrible. 11 goals in three games doesn't get it done in the playoffs. Osgood is a proven winner in the playoffs. 74 career wins to 1. What do you think? 2 Zeowingsfan and Frozen-Man reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted April 18, 2010 They need to win. Howard has looked terrible. 11 goals in three games doesn't get it done in the playoffs. Osgood is a proven winner in the playoffs. 74 career wins to 1. What do you think? Bryzgalov has let in only two less goals, and he has not been repeatedly hung out to dry by his defense. 3 Hockeymom1960, Drake_Marcus and majoturc reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Osgood is not playoff-ready. Howard is the Wings' only shot at this point, and even if he pulls a Legace he will be the man we have to rely on in the playoffs. Thread over. 4 Hockeymom1960, Green Wing, Hossa4Life and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MCleveland89 122 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 I knew this thread was coming. Hard to say what is going to happen though. That 4th goal Jimmy should of had for sure. I don't know if we should experiment right now though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Four Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Wont make a difference if Detroit continues to play like the ******* Leafs. 2 Hockeymom1960 and Green Wing reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carman 387 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Not a chance. Sorry the Wings aren't a s***ty ran team like Washington that just changes goalies day to day. Jimmy needs to prove himself, and the Wings actually need to come to play in front of him. 4 Hockeymom1960, lookalive07, Hossa4Life and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 If Howard repeats this s*** next game, then I wouldn't mind. Too early yet to give up completely on the series. That's what putting in Ozzie would be like. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b.shanafan14 733 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Flashes of "No OsSuck, screw him" over the last 4 months are running in my head... To the OP's question, I wish I could say 'yes', I honestly don't think Howard could have a worse go his first playoffs, but Babcock "retired" Osgood in January and there is literally no chance Osgood would be able to shake off that much rust in order to turn it around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Howard will start game 4. If Howard doesn't improve, Osgood will finish that game and the series most likely. I get that the teams been rough as a whole, but Howard gave up some total backbreaker goals. The first in the first 20 seconds is brutal for a teams momentum, then the end of the 2nd and the worst, that 4th goal...he's gotta be making more of these saves. He absolutely hasn't been theJimmy Howard of the regular season. He had to do it all himself plenty of times, and now is is the playoffs. You need your goalie to be great in the playoffs. Any way you shake it, Howard hasn't been great at all in the playoffs. 1 GoWings1905 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RedLightGoesOn 81 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Our D can suck, but our goalie has to rob someone. I SAY OSGOOD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Howard He Do It?! Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Howard doesn't get to 74 playoff wins if you give up on him now. Ozzie wasn't always Mr. Playoff's you know. Not every goalie is going to pull a Ken Dryden in their rookie season. Extreme overreaction. 4 wings7, zettie85, Hockeymom1960 and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drake_Marcus 890 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 (edited) Bryzgalov has let in only two less goals, and he has not been repeatedly hung out to dry by his defense. On top of that this was Jimmy's first playoff home game-- we'll have to see how he bounces back. He's been able to bounce back really well so far in the regular season so I can only assume he will in game 4. The point is that Howard is our goaltending future-- hiding him on the bench won't solve anything long-term. Edited April 18, 2010 by Drake_Marcus 3 AARedWingFan, Hockeymom1960 and redwings4life reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gcom007 1,465 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Howard doesn't get to 74 playoff wins if you give up on him now. Ozzie wasn't always Mr. Playoff's you know. Not every goalie is going to pull a Ken Dryden in their rookie season. Extreme overreaction. There's a difference between trading him ASAP and sitting our rookie goalie on the bench to watch in exchange for the best playoff goalie of the last two years with 3 Cups to his name. 2 Frozen-Man and GoWings1905 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b.shanafan14 733 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Howard doesn't get to 74 playoff wins if you give up on him now. Ozzie wasn't always Mr. Playoff's you know. Not every goalie is going to pull a Ken Dryden in their rookie season. Extreme overreaction. As far as I'm concerned, I really understand that Howard is green in the playoffs and he was going to get some lumps. I'm more pissed off that Babcock bet the farm on Howard since December and now we have the best playoff goaltender in the last two seasons rusted pass the point of no return. Babcock doesn't seem to inspire the team, he plays favorites constantly, and now he has a rookie goaltender that is looking pretty sad between the pipes while the one he owns a ring to is taking stats. 4 mb94, GoWings1905, shoe and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BuckeyeWingsfan80 209 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 I'll say no, but Howard might have a short leash in Game 4. That said, if the guys in front of whoever is the goalie in game 4 doesn't sack up and ******* play hockey instead of soccer on ice it really won't matter much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Someone should start a "30 posts for a game 4 win" thread. You know, 30 as in Ozzie's number. 1 BuckeyeWingsfan80 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dynheart 42 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 You'd figure people around here would think twice before they count Osgood out. How many times does this guy need to shut up media and fans alike? But alas. As far as Ozzie in for Howard? Tough one. Ozzie in the Philly game look horrible the first period (to be expected...hardly plays). But the 2nd and 3rd period he was getting better and better. Only let in 3 goals that game...rusty... I mean RUSTY. But the play-offs are a diffrent beast. Ozzie has proven he can handle it, but would it be enough? Honestly none of us know, not even the self proclaimed couch coaches. After todays game, there's a time a time where a player has to step up big. It was Howies time to shine...he dropped the ball with that 4th goal. He knew it, just look at the body language after the goal. I say one more game. If we win next game 6-4 or 7-5, I say play Osgood. Even rusty, against a high scoring philly team, he let in 3 goals rusty. If we lose big next game I say play Ozzie. If we lose 1-0 or 2-1..then I say keep playing Howie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Doc Holliday 1,888 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 On top of that this was Jimmy's first playoff home game-- we'll have to see how he bounces back. He's been able to bounce back really well so far in the playoffs so I can only assume he will in game 4. The point is that Howard is our goaltending future-- hiding him on the bench won't solve anything long-term. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 1,049 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 As I mentioned in the GDT, I believe Babcock's married to him. This may be a bit out of left field, but I think if Osgood had responded with a solid or spectacular effort when he made his start in Philadelphia then Babcock may look more toward him if Howard continues to falter in Game 4. As it stands, I'd be shocked to see Osgood in anything other than mop-up duty. 2 GoWings1905 and haroldsnepsts reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 Not a chance. Sorry the Wings aren't a s***ty ran team like Washington that just changes goalies day to day. Jimmy needs to prove himself, and the Wings actually need to come to play in front of him. This. Howard would have to let in several Legace-like backbreaking goals before they should yank him to put in Ozzy. And even then it would be a desperate move. The Wings would probably get a delay of game penalty as they waited for Ozzy to get all the dust off his pads. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dat's sick 1,002 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 If Howard lets in a couple of softies early in Game 4, yes it's Ozzie time. No way does Ozzie start Game 4 though. In Howard we have to trust. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Matt 1,049 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 The biggest thing with Howard is confidence. I think once he gets it he's unflappable, but Game 4 will be the ultimate determining factor of that. The 4th goal was situationally devastating but the other three I'd blame more on his defense (with a dash of inability to control rebounds). 1 haroldsnepsts reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
b.shanafan14 733 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 On top of that this was Jimmy's first playoff home game-- we'll have to see how he bounces back. He's been able to bounce back really well so far in the playoffs so I can only assume he will in game 4. The point is that Howard is our goaltending future-- hiding him on the bench won't solve anything long-term. I agree with some points, I guess. But bounce back REALLY WELL so far?? By that do you mean letting in 4 goals, 2 of which came right after Wings goals to kill momentum in the womb?? If Bryzgalov had played to half of his potential, this series would be 3-0 'Yotes with a chance to sweep. I said it after Game 2, if the Wings need to get 6 goals passed Bryzgalov to win, they are screwed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Howard He Do It?! Report post Posted April 18, 2010 There's a difference between trading him ASAP and sitting our rookie goalie on the bench to watch in exchange for the best playoff goalie of the last two years with 3 Cups to his name. To watch Osgood do just as bad? This team has one option in goal and his name is Jimmy Howard. It's glaringly obvious and it doesn't matter who you have allegiances to. Two Cups while playing, one while watching. 1 Gordie Howe hat trick reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
digitaljohn88 4 Report post Posted April 18, 2010 This is why people calling for Ozzy to start more than 1 game in the last few months weren't just blind Ozzy homers. It'd be nice to have the OPTION to go to him, but we really don't have that. Howard should start game 4 anyway. If he sucks and we lose, I'd go to Ozzy for game 5. Not that it would really matter after that. 3 mb94, DSM and GoWings1905 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites