kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) Saw this topic over at Hfboards and thought it was interesting. Who's the one player that you think would put us over the top, and who would you give to get him. Over there, they put everyone in the league in play and the only stipulation was that you had to give fair value to get him. I'm changing that. Has to fit under the cap, has to be "reasonably" available (so basically no elites like Stamkos, Crosby, Malkin, etc.), has to get fair value in return, and try as best you can to meet the other team's needs as well. Also, assume that Eaves and Tootoo are gone as well. Giving us an extra 3.2 million toward the cap. As such, we'd be sitting 2.4 million below the cap. Mine? Evander Kane for Franzen, Mrazek, 1st. Zetterber-Datsyuk-Kane Alfie-Weiss-Sammy Tatar-Andersson-Nyquist Miller-Helm-Abby Bert Kronwall-Ericsson Dekeyser-Kindl Smith-Quincey Lashoff Howard Gustavsson Edited August 28, 2013 by kipwinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motown4013 350 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Saw this topic over at Hfboards and thought it was interesting. Who's the one player that you think would put us over the top, and who would you give to get him. Over there, they put everyone in the league in play and the only stipulation was that you had to give fair value to get him. I'm changing that. Has to fit under the cap, has to be "reasonably" available (so basically no elites like Stamkos, Crosby, Malkin, etc.), has to get fair value in return, and try as best you can to meet the other team's needs as well. Also, assume that Eaves and Tootoo are gone as well. Giving us an extra 3.2 million toward the cap. As such, we'd be sitting 2.4 million below the cap. Mine? Evander Kane for Franzen, Mrazek, 1st. Zetterber-Datsyuk-Kane Alfie-Weiss-Sammy Tatar-Andersson-Nyquist Miller-Helm-Abby Bert Kronwall-Ericsson Dekeyser-Kindl Smith-Quincey Lashoff Howard Gustavsson I like Kane....but thats a LOT to give up for him. Mule, a first and Mrzek (goalie if the future)???.....I think that might be too much for PATRICK Kane. 5 Hockeymom1960, Namingway, Z Winged Dangler and 2 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 I like Kane....but thats a LOT to give up for him. Mule, a first and Mrzek (goalie if the future)???.....I think that might be too much for PATRICK Kane. I was talking about Evander Kane, so you're probably going to be MUCH more disappointed haha. Originally I had Sammy, Mrazek, 1st, but thought that was underpayment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Euro_Twins 4,485 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Ty Conklin!!!! for real though, I wouldn't mind snagging Clifford, I would send over Tootoo and a 4th/5th round pick for him. or a 3rd round pick and one of our prospects, like sheehan. Ryan Clowe, or Yandle would be good choices too. (although I know we will never get Yandle, someone I know, has a source very close to Holland and apparently the asking price for yandle was, a 1st round pick, Mrazek, tatar/nyquist, smith and possibly someone else, I don't remember now, and Holland basically hung up on him when he he heard that) I was talking about Evander Kane, so you're probably going to be MUCH more disappointed haha. Originally I had Sammy, Mrazek, 1st, but thought that was underpayment. I think that was why he bolded Patrick, he was saying it would be too much to give up for Patrick kane, let alone evander. Thats how I took it at least 1 Motown4013 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) Ty Conklin!!!! for real though, I wouldn't mind snagging Clifford, I would send over Tootoo and a 4th/5th round pick for him. or a 3rd round pick and one of our prospects, like sheehan. Ryan Clowe, or Yandle would be good choices too. (although I know we will never get Yandle, someone I know, has a source very close to Holland and apparently the asking price for yandle was, a 1st round pick, Mrazek, tatar/nyquist, smith and possibly someone else, I don't remember now, and Holland basically hung up on him when he he heard that) I think that was why he bolded Patrick, he was saying it would be too much to give up for Patrick kane, let alone evander. Thats how I took it at least You're definitely right, I wasn't reading carefully. While I realize it might be an overpayment, you're getting a 22 year old stud power forward, for a good forward (Franzen), and really good prospect (Mrazek), and the first. The reason I'm ok with it is because I don't think Mrazek will be the goalie of the future. Not because he isn't good enough, but because Jimmy is still young and is on a five year contract. The Wings can't keep Mrazek as a AHLer and backup for that long, he's too good, and you're not likely to get anybody better than Kane down the road anyway. But I do understand why some might think that's too much. Edited August 28, 2013 by kipwinger Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GoWings1905 2,694 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) I think the Red Wings biggest need right now is a top-pairing d-man. Less necessary because of the DeKeyser emergence, but I still believe someone to complement Kronwall would really solidify the defense. Granted, most teams aren't willingly going to give up such an asset. I'm sure the asking price was/would be insane, but the one name that comes to mind for me is Alex Edler. There were rumors earlier in the summer of his availability and the Red Wings being interested, so he was at that point reasonably available. Again, without question one of Nyquist or Tatar is going the other way for starters. Beyond that, I would just be guessing at what it would take to acquire Edler. Edited August 28, 2013 by GoWings1905 1 marcaractac reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nevermind 363 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Dan Girardi from the Rangers. He's a UFA after this season--so it might not be that unreasonable if the Rangers fall out of contention and feel they likely can't re-sign him. Plus, Glen Sather's an idiot. I'd trade Quincey away somehow to make room for him. NYR probably wouldn't want Quincey since he's also a UFA next offseason. But I'd overpay a bit for Girardi--a right handed guy who's extremely solid defensively. Certainly better than Q. Kronwall-Girardi DeKeyser-Kindl Smith-Ericsson Lashoff That would be awesome... 2 Z Winged Dangler and Detroit \# 1 Fan reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Dan Girardi from the Rangers. He's a UFA after this season--so it might not be that unreasonable if the Rangers fall out of contention and feel they likely can't re-sign him. Plus, Glen Sather's an idiot. I'd trade Quincey away somehow to make room for him. NYR probably wouldn't want Quincey since he's also a UFA next offseason. But I'd overpay a bit for Girardi--a right handed guy who's extremely solid defensively. Certainly better than Q. Kronwall-Girardi DeKeyser-Kindl Smith-Ericsson Lashoff That would be awesome... I really like Girardi, don't get me wrong. But do you think he's the one guy that would put us over the top? I'm not so sure. He's a stud though, I'll give you that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motown4013 350 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 I really like Girardi, don't get me wrong. But do you think he's the one guy that would put us over the top? I'm not so sure. He's a stud though, I'll give you that. She DID know you were talking about Evander... and yes, Girardi would be great in the winged wheel!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 She DID know you were talking about Evander... and yes, Girardi would be great in the winged wheel!! Again, Girardi is a really good player. I'm just not sure that he's the missing piece in a cup run. I think our defense was fine in the playoffs last year, I just don't think we were deep enough in our top six. Adding a young, goal scoring, power forward would make the difference in my opinion. Basically I view us like the 1995 Wings, tons of skill, but in need of a big body with scoring potential. I also view Kane as a poor man's Shanahan, i.e. just what the doctor ordered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Can't think of anyone we could "realistically" get that would put us over the top. As in just one player. Maybe a top line winger with size and skill, but how the hell do we acquire one of those? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nevermind 363 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) I really like Girardi, don't get me wrong. But do you think he's the one guy that would put us over the top? I'm not so sure. He's a stud though, I'll give you that. I agree--he's not going to transform us into Cup favorites. But I definitely think he'd strengthen our chances and allow Kronwall more freedom (not that Ericsson's been bad...he's just no Girardi). Regardless, I'm guessing the Rangers extend him for $5M+ per during the season anyways (he plays over 25 minutes a night for them and would be a huge loss). For "over-the-top", it's tough to be realistic. Even then, who could be traded? Vanek is the only elite forward that jumps out to me. So perhaps Vanek for a Franzen + picks/prospects package. Buffalo gets a solid goal-scorer in return for someone they probably can't re-sign. Obviously, to make the deal we'd have to be pretty sure Vanek would re-sign with us for a fair price. But then again, we'd be more over the top with both Franzen and Vanek. Franzen is too old for a rebulding Buffalo anyways. I'll let you know how this goes when NHL 14 comes out haha (somehow we don't trade Nyquist/Tatar for Vanek)... Zetterberg-Datsyuk-Vanek Franzen-Weiss-Alfredsson Nyquist-Helm-Tatar Miller-Andersson-Abdelkader (Scratches: probablyEmmertonbecausehe'sacenter and hopefullynotSamuelssonbutmaybeBertuzziorTootooorEaves) In reality though, hopefully this is the guy who puts us over the top by stepping up his game on a much better team. Edited August 28, 2013 by Nevermind 2 Motown4013 and Wingsfan72 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
luvmnger 125 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 coulda had burmistrov for "free".....(khl) BTW...winnipeg switched with us...no compete team. kid lost his confidence behind coach. needed russian stud to learn from***cough***dats***cough. day 2 of free agency i would have made this happen. lose tootoo, emmer, sammy, cleary. get brunner back. 4 out...2 in. would have been my play. z-pav-burmi mule-weiss-alfie brunner-nyquil-andersson eaves-helm?-bert miller-tatar rotation spread mins out over 4 lines and keep balanced attack also...E.Kane would be a great piece...but expensive. kids got moxie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wingsfan72 198 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Up front? I'd say Thomas Vanek or Kris Versteeg On D, Dustin Byfuglien or Yandle. I'd say the most realistically attainable player out of these four would be Vanek. We could use a big top line, right handed shot. A right handed dman like Buf would be pretty awesome. I feel like our D is more inclined defensively and don't really contribute too much, goal-scoring wise. Also, Versteeg's favorite player is Steve Yzerman so he's got that going for him.... I couldn't possibly come up with a realistic trade for any of these guys though... I haven't been able to watch too many non-Wings games, especially Eastern Conference teams, so I wouldn't really know what would fit the other team's needs. I know that Vanek has publicly said that he would welcome a trade and he is on the last year of his contract, so he might be a relatively cheap pick up. http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nhl/184861/sabres-thomas-vanek-fuels-trade-speculation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cnot19 191 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 If give up everyone minus dats and z for Lucic or Wayne simmonds. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Crymson Report post Posted August 28, 2013 coulda had burmistrov for "free".....(khl) BTW...winnipeg switched with us...no compete team. Burmistrov is an RFA. The Jets still own his rights. On D, Dustin Byfuglien or Yandle. Two overrated defensemen who are bad at actual defense? Why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 If give up everyone minus dats and z for Lucic or Wayne simmonds. Lucic, Clarkson those are the type of players every team needs but I honestly think defense is more needed than offense. The DetroitRedWings lack that clutch number 1 defenseman we've become so used to for almost two decades, the only one who might be available soon is Alex Pietrangelo he fixes a lot of needs and Babcock himself has stated, that Alex reminds him of the perfect human in terms of hockey IQ. If not him, then Shattenkirk. Vanek would be another nice option but the DetroitRedWings don't have the assets required to get him, the Sabres are going to ask for the moon and giving up that much for a rental is a gamble, I wouldn't want to take. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
krsmith17 7,191 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 To DET - Zach Bogosian To WPG - Jakub Kindl, Jordin Tootoo, Alexei Marchenko, 2014 2nd. Kronwall - Ericsson DeKeyser - Bogosian Smith - Quincey Lashoff AND / OR To DET - Jarret Stoll To LAK - Patrick Eaves, Joakim Andersson, 2014 3rd. Zetterberg - Datsyuk - Alfredsson Bertuzzi - Weiss - Stoll Nyquist - Franzen - Tatar Abdelkader - Helm - Miller Emmerton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dirtydangles 1,328 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Bogosian and James Neal. No time to set up trade possibilities - we don't have the assets for both either. 1 96warrior reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Burmistrov is an RFA. The Jets still own his rights. Two overrated defensemen who are bad at actual defense? Why? Care to make a suggestion of your own that meets the OP's requirements? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RyanBarnes! 293 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 I think we need a solid energy player if Helm does not return and if he does even better. Ryan Callahan or Shawn Mattias would be nice, both probably too expensive, but I would give up Nyquist + Tatar/Ouellet/pick for either. If I could dream, yeah then Evander Kane or maybe Mika Zibanejad would be nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
amato 3,210 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Lucic, Clarkson those are the type of players every team needs but I honestly think defense is more needed than offense. The DetroitRedWings lack that clutch number 1 defenseman we've become so used to for almost two decades, the only one who might be available soon is Alex Pietrangelo he fixes a lot of needs and Babcock himself has stated, that Alex reminds him of the perfect human in terms of hockey IQ. If not him, then Shattenkirk. Vanek would be another nice option but the DetroitRedWings don't have the assets required to get him, the Sabres are going to ask for the moon and giving up that much for a rental is a gamble, I wouldn't want to take. if we don't have the assets required to get vanek.. then we sure as hell don't have the ones to get pietrangelo. though i'd absolutely love to get him in the winged wheel. he's going to be one of the best dmen for years to come Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,232 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 We need goals. More than that, though, we need a top-flight defenseman. Going into this season, we can all agree: if we have an Achilles' heel, it's our D. That's not good. Here are four defensemen who might be able to help our cause: [/bleacherreport] Dan Girardi had a rough year, I guess. Some would say brutal. And yet, the Rags did pretty well for themselves, all things considered. (Even though they were a crushing disappointment, and Brad Richards died in that terrible accident, etc.) This makes me think maybe Giradi's kinda sorta expendable tradable able-to-be-parted-with. OK, not really, but this is all pretend anyway. Dan Girardi for one or two or three of the following: - A roster defenseman who isn't Kronwall or DeKeyser (or maybe Smith) - A non-first-round pick (maybe a first-rounder. Depends) - A solid prospect/youngin' - Franzen Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Euro_Twins 4,485 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 I think we need a solid energy player if Helm does not return and if he does even better. Ryan Callahan or Shawn Mattias would be nice, both probably too expensive, but I would give up Nyquist + Tatar/Ouellet/pick for either. If I could dream, yeah then Evander Kane or maybe Mika Zibanejad would be nice. That's why I suggested Clifford Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Z Winged Dangler 2,082 Report post Posted August 28, 2013 Dan Girardi from the Rangers. He's a UFA after this season--so it might not be that unreasonable if the Rangers fall out of contention and feel they likely can't re-sign him. Plus, Glen Sather's an idiot. I'd trade Quincey away somehow to make room for him. NYR probably wouldn't want Quincey since he's also a UFA next offseason. But I'd overpay a bit for Girardi--a right handed guy who's extremely solid defensively. Certainly better than Q. Kronwall-Girardi DeKeyser-Kindl Smith-Ericsson Lashoff That would be awesome... I really like the idea of Girardi for Quincey and maybe even throw in a guy like Almqvist. That would wrap things up on D quite well. I think the real thing we're missing as well on forward is a guy like Milan Lucic. I would be willing to give up Franzen and Mrazek for him in a heartbeat. I may even throw in the 1st round pick as well. I'd take him over Evander Kane. Kane has the same issues that Seguin does, which is why Loui Eriksson is a much better all around player than he is. He doesn't have the off ice crap going on and his game is exceptional. Eriksson is also another guy I really wanted, but I'll settle for him on the B's. Lucic on a line with Dats and Z would be monstrous. Weber wouldn't turnbuckle smash Z with Lucic on the ice and neither would anyone else. He's also an annoying net presence. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites