Jump to content

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
- - - - -

The Hudler Factor

  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 Dabura



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,399 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 30 January 2014 - 01:47 PM

So I was talking with a Flames fan. At one point in our conversation he playfully trolled me about how the Flames "stole" Hudler from us, and how his absence will be the end of us. I played along, wink wink, but I slowly realized he was actually semi-serious. Not because he's especially fond of Hudler (though "Happy" has, in fact, been one of the Flames more valuable players), but because of our troubles this season. Shootout woes? Hudler. Goal-scoring woes? Hudler. Second-line center hole? Hudler.


Wouldn't it be something if we miss the playoffs because of our total incompetence in shootouts? Should that come to pass, do we hang the first person who says, "Should've kept Hudler"? Or would he have a point? And, if so, does the universe implode?


I hated Hudler as a Wing. To me, he encapsulated everything that was misguided and wrong about our team. I was glad to see him go. But let's talk about him, knowing full well that Kenny will bring him back, sooner or later.


Do we miss Jiri Hudler?

"If I were to wish for anything, I should not wish for wealth and power, but for the passionate sense of the potential, for the eye which, ever young and ardent, sees the possible. Pleasure disappoints, possibility never. And what wine is so sparkling, what so fragrant, what so intoxicating, as possibility!" - Kierkegaard

#2 stillwater


    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 829 posts
  • Location:ontario

Posted 30 January 2014 - 01:52 PM

Hudler would only be one more thing to complain about. Don't miss him at all. The Flames can have him.

It must be pathetic to be a Flames fan, when Hudler is one of the things you puff your chest out about.

Edited by stillwater, 30 January 2014 - 02:13 PM.

#3 sleepwalker


    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,146 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 01:54 PM

No, I don't miss him.  He wasn't a good fit here, and was often a detriment to the team due to his small size and getting constantly knocked off the puck by everyone else on the ice.


But hey, Sammy and Quincey were OK here and then left and we brought them back only for them to suck.  Maybe it'll  be the opposite with Hudler. 

#4 Euro_Twins


    Healthy Scratch

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,952 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario

Posted 30 January 2014 - 01:58 PM

Hudler was not good in the shootout, he was very inconsistent and he wasn't good defensively. He wasn't physical at all, and he wouldn't have fixed anything if he was still here

#5 rick zombo

rick zombo


  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,500 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 02:07 PM

I miss Filpulla a bit.


Hudler? Not at all. Although he was good for a laugh.

"In Detroit, every day is a good day to win"

#6 jimmyemeryhunter



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,949 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 30 January 2014 - 02:12 PM

I'm with rick on this.
Fil was always one I had high hopes for, I was a little sad to see him go, and never cared for hudler.
I met him when I played for belle tire, he was goofy as hell,and kind of an ass, he wouldn't sign my practice jersey.
And flames fans are crazy.
I was on a flames board lookin to see what they thought of cammaleri and they said jurco, sheahan,aand someone else were fourth borderline 3rd line players.

#7 DickieDunn



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,960 posts
  • Location:Belding

Posted 30 January 2014 - 03:49 PM

I liked Hudler, and always thought that he got way too much crap.  But, they had Tatar and Nyquist coming, and you only need so many small wingers on your team, so I wasn't really upset that he left. 


I couldn't wait to see Filppula leave town.  He had one season of over 40 points despite playing in the top 3 or 4 ice time for forwards and I always thought his defense, while pretty good, was overblown by his defenders.  Last year he acted like he just plain didn't care.

I bought some Maple Lea Tea.  It cost a fortune and didn't come with a Cup.

#8 b.shanafan14


    One good Swede deserves another!

  • Silver Booster
  • 2,883 posts
  • Location:Upper Peninsula, Michigan

Posted 30 January 2014 - 04:01 PM

Hudler could have helped with scoring, but so would any of the players who are currently or have previously been injured for long stretches this season (Datsyuk, Zetterberg, Franzen, Helm, Alfredsson, etc.) Hudler was never over-overwhelmingly good in the shootout either, so I don't see how he is a game-changer there. His skating and defense were both weak, and he never really played much center when he was here if I recall correctly, nor would he now when we're healthy.


I don't really see how Hudler helps us this season. Our problems scoring and with the second-line center position have to do with injuries to players who are better than Hudler (especially how he was when he was here). Our problem in the shootout should be remedied by playing stronger in regulation and OT to close out games before the skills competition. As bleak as things look at times, we are tied in points for the last playoff spot in the East despite missing significant players, subpar goaltending at times, being unable to gain any momentum or chemistry, and all the while during what was bound to be the big transition year we've all been dreading.


Get healthy, get settled down and familiar (read: gain consistent lineup and establish chemistry), and make a push for the playoffs, then anything can happen - as we saw again last season when we went from getting a spot the last day and sticking around 14 games and several OTs against two teams that should have been head-and-shoulders better than us.


EDIT: Sorry, started with the Hudler thread and got sidetracked. The point, however, should be in tact. Of all the things we need to be better, losing Hudler is hardly the cause, nor would it be resolved if he was still here.

Edited by b.shanafan14, 30 January 2014 - 04:12 PM.

#9 jimmyemeryhunter



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,949 posts
  • Location:Michigan

Posted 30 January 2014 - 04:05 PM

Don't we have a game or two in hand too?

#10 kipwinger



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,919 posts
  • Location:Washington, District of Columbia

Posted 30 January 2014 - 04:08 PM

I think if we had Hudler back Babcock's head might explode.  He'd stick Huds on the third line with Tatar and some center, and they'd be the highest scoring 3rd in the league and Babs would be sooooooooooo pissssssssssssssssed.

GMRwings:  "Well, in other civilized countries, 16 years old isn't considered underage.  For instance, I believe the age of consent is 16 in Canada.  There's some US states where it's 16 as well.  


Get off the high horse.  Not like she was 10."


"Some girls are 17 even though they look 25."



#11 MabusIncarnate


    The Truth Is Out There

  • Silver Booster Mod
  • 2,402 posts
  • Location:Monteagle, Tennessee

Posted 30 January 2014 - 05:06 PM

Hudler would never have the same role here and ice time that he is receiving in Calgary. Over there he is a top 2 forward. Here he barely cracks the top 6. His success is based around their need for him in Calgary and having no other options.


I do miss the freaky happy face and the humorous photoshop options.

$1 for every game won including BottleOfSmoke butt pats in the GDT

$5 for every series win

$1 for every Photoshop War submission I post

A flat donation of $10 regardless of what happens in addition to any conditions met above because it's for a good cause. 

Current Total - $13

#12 Dabura



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,399 posts
  • Location:In an octopus's garden

Posted 30 January 2014 - 06:24 PM

I guess my memory of Hudler is warped. I remember him being a beast in the shootout, spending time as a center, and having a knack for scoring clutch goals that we all wished someone else on our team had scored.

"If I were to wish for anything, I should not wish for wealth and power, but for the passionate sense of the potential, for the eye which, ever young and ardent, sees the possible. Pleasure disappoints, possibility never. And what wine is so sparkling, what so fragrant, what so intoxicating, as possibility!" - Kierkegaard

#13 NitzGuy


    Jr. Prospect

  • Member
  • 21 posts

Posted 30 January 2014 - 06:53 PM

I remember thinking that paying 4 mill a season for him and 5 for fill was way overpayment. Now I think we may have just been spoiled. I know I'd much much rather have hudler than Sammy and tootoo. I always liked fill and I really liked the fill hank huds line.

I just can't stop picturing our roster with those two on it instead of all the garbage that replaced them. But hindsight is 20/20. I just wish fill had found his shot while he was in Detroit.

#14 55fan


    All mine 'til 2-0-1-9

  • HoF Booster
  • 13,066 posts
  • Location:Fargo, ND

Posted 30 January 2014 - 08:16 PM

No one served bench minors like Happy.

Money on the board!  Current total: $2

$1 for each goal scored by a current Wing after whom I've named a hamster.  +$5 if one scores a hat trick.

+$1 if a GWG.  +$5 if it is a GWG in a series-winning game.+$50 if it is the GWG that wins us the Cup.

$5 for each time a goalie after whom I've named a hamster prevents all opposing shots from going in the net.

The hamsters names are as follows (current Wings in red)

Henrik Pavel Tomas Nicklas Dominik

Niklas Matthieu Daniel Robert

Johan Andreas Valtteri Jonathan

Andrew (Drew) Patrick Ian Todd

Jordin Damien Gustav James


#15 cnot19


    1st Line Sniper

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 753 posts
  • Location:New Jersey

Posted 30 January 2014 - 08:25 PM

Lol way too sift and small for my liking
Get me a real fourth line Kenny!

#16 hooon



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,292 posts
  • Location:Denver

Posted 30 January 2014 - 11:46 PM

Tatar is a better version of what Hudler is, and Tatar tries harder too. 


Now, would I rather have Hudler than, say, Cleary? Or Bert? Yes. But if Hudler was here it would just mean one of Tatar or Nyquist wouldn't be on the team.

Posted Image

#17 nyqvististhefuture


    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,729 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 01:55 AM

Don't miss hudler , he was a contributor in our back to back cup finals but was just time to let him go , same as filppula who never became what we hoped he would .....so long to both

Our problems aren't cause we let them go .... Our problems is because we kept bringing back players that had no business ever coming back (Samuelson,cleary,bertuzzi) and always keep delaying bringing in some prospects 1-2 at a time and let them develop here and learn from the veterans while they can

Nyquist and Tatar should of been here last Season and if they were they'd be better players right now and we'd be better off

Edited by nyqvististhefuture, 31 January 2014 - 01:55 AM.

#18 fixxxer


    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 603 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 02:54 AM

Don't miss Hudler or Fil both don't fill the type of players we need at least in my perspective.

#19 frankgrimes



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,044 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 06:36 AM

Wish him all the best but glad, he's gone. This team nees bigger bodies. I'm sure the Flames are happy with him, but he just didn't fit here



The Offseason of truth ...

Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!

blank cheque for The Captain or Jim Star Nil please..

<< Win it for Mr. Hockey ! f*** this league

#20 amato



  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts

Posted 31 January 2014 - 08:58 AM

last night i had a dream nightmare that huds was actually re-aquired by the wings.... this thread must be why. so Dabura, it's all your fault :P


Dat·syu·ki·an [dat-soo-kee-uh n]


          1. When your moves are so amazing and beyond reason, the only way to describe them is "datsyukian."

Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users