Will there be an impact trade by the wings?
#1
Posted 08 February 2012 - 11:25 PM
#3
Posted 08 February 2012 - 11:39 PM
Also, I believe they might go after a back end DMan
Edited by HockeytownRules19, 08 February 2012 - 11:39 PM.
#4
Posted 08 February 2012 - 11:50 PM
#5
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:10 AM
#6
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:19 AM
I think they'll just say bringing back Eaves from injury is our major move. In all seriousness though, I could see us chasing a top 9 forward, although the asking price for any top 6 forward would be very high due to the parity in the league and the lack of sellers. This trade deadline looks to be a fairly uneventful and even boring (compared to usual) trade deadline. I would love to see us chase Ruutu, Stewart, maybe even Hemsky, but with the asking price so high, I doubt Ken Holland will be willing to part with much for a rental player...
I don't know if we'll be seeing Eaves at all this year. Kenny and Mick alluded to him having nagging concussion problems today during the game, in addition to the busted jaw.
#7
Posted 09 February 2012 - 04:32 AM
#8
Posted 09 February 2012 - 05:57 AM
Come on dude we're #1 in the league, the team does not need a major wake-up call. Even if Holland does NOTHING we'll still be one of the teams that have a good shot at the cup this year.Id say that a big trade might wake up this team, every player knows their job is safe no matter how badly they play.
Now personally I think, and hope, Holland will do something, add a guy or two that can increase our chances of success in the playoffs. But a major trade is a gamble for a team that is doing as well as we are, and Holland has not shown to be a guy that gambles and gives up a lot just for a big-name player.
So yes I think there will be an 'impact' trade, but I don't think Holland will go after Nash or Parise as the prize will most likely be too high.
#10
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:17 AM
I think we need to go after a 2nd line forward. Someone who will replace and be an upgrade over the Todd. Ruutu is a good target other than his injury history and the current status of his price tag. The real dilemma is Lidstroms status tho. If were going to send some prospects packaging, it should probably be for a defender. Our unwillingness to pay market price in free agency means we'll probably go the trade route for a good player and that's where we should spend our assets. I believe in Holland's ability to fill our forward spot without spending too much tho, so we'll see.
- Rick D and IllinoisRedWingsFan like this
#11
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:56 AM
I want a reliable back up goalie. Maybe JMac is the one but I don't have a lot of confidence in him.
JMac has looked pretty good the past few games. Part of that is the fact that he's getting a lot of D support.
This team isnt built to win the Cup
Det is 1st in the league. This statement is bewildering. The team is .500 on the road, and .875 at home. If they lock up a top spot and have home ice then they have every chance of winning.
- 55fan likes this
#12
Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:10 AM
#13
Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:23 AM
Money of the Board-2013 Playoff Edition: Current $33 ($5 per series win {1}, $5 per series sweep, $5 per Kronwalling {2}, $2 per Jimmy shutout or fight {1}, $2 per Tootoo goal or fight, $2 per Mule or Brunner goal {8})
#14
Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:50 AM
Yeah seriously, if we place 1st in the West or even in the league and get home-ice throughout the playoffs.. we have a real good opportunity.Det is 1st in the league. This statement is bewildering. The team is .500 on the road, and .875 at home. If they lock up a top spot and have home ice then they have every chance of winning.
Especially if we don't have to go all the way out to Phoenix and San Jose for the first two rounds. Something like Minnesota 1st round and Chicago 2nd round would be much better.
#15
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:11 AM
On a serious note, No .. The last trade that had a impact on the Wings was aquiring Stuart and somehow Holland grabbed him for picks. I don't see that happening this year at all. To many teams in the thick of the playoff race and not a deep rental pool. Moen will not just go for picks, Hemsky will not go for picks, and idk what Nabakov would go for cuz im not sure how many goalie rentals there are.
#16
Posted 09 February 2012 - 10:17 AM
Det is 1st in the league. This statement is bewildering. The team is .500 on the road, and .875 at home. If they lock up a top spot and have home ice then they have every chance of winning.
This is essentially the same team that's been less than motivates to win in the playoffs the last two years. St. Louis got Hitcock and Elliot, SJ got another #1 defenseman and replace the His Heartlessness Dany Heatley, Chicago has more depth on offense and defense and Toews, Kane, and Leddy are just gonna keep getting better, Nashville plays like they want to win every game. We replaced Brian Rafalski with a player who, even in a career year, is arguably not as good as Rafalski. Our other addition is a borderline 6th defenseman, who is a terrible fighter and and even more terrible skater in Commodore. Zetterberg is playing like he's 40, Bertuzzi is not a top six forward, our bottom six forwards have the least potential for offense of any Wings team in 15 years, our backup goalie may be the worst goalie in the league right now. Cleary, Helm, Holmstrom have all regressed. Ericsson is as horrible as ever.
Pittsburgh just won 9 in a row with an AHL roster...but do you think that'll happen in the playoffs? If regular season success meant anything San Jose would be a dynasty. Its almost a given that they will choke but they have ousted us the last two years with what I thought was beatable play. We only play when we want and the last two years we turn it on too late. Every year we've won the Cup we've had a reason and drive. '97-Duh, 52 years, '98-Konstantinov, '02- Maybe the best team ever (Robitaille and Duschene), '08-Dallas Drake, Cleary, most the players hadn't won. Now? You get the picture.
I believe, because I've seen it for 15 years, that the Wings always have a chance and better than most teams. But only when they play like they really want it and we don't do that consistantly anymore.
- Detroit # 1 Fan, Rick D, stinky fish taco and 1 other like this
#17
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:05 AM
#18
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:17 AM
Toews, Kane, and Leddy are just gonna keep getting better
Who's to say that our players aren't getting better?
We replaced Brian Rafalski with a player who, even in a career year, is arguably not as good as Rafalski.
So you're saying he's arguably better than Rafalski? That sounds like a good thing.
our bottom six forwards have the least potential for offense of any Wings team in 15 years
We're ranked 5th in goals per game, yet we only have 1 top 20 goal scorer in the league. Sounds like we're getting production out of everyone.
Ericsson is as horrible as ever.
Not even remotely true.
If regular season success meant anything San Jose would be a dynasty.
I'm pretty sure that Detroit has had the most regular season success out of every team the past 10 years. Just looked it up, they've won the President's Trophy 4 times in the last decade. No other team has won it twice within that span. Within those years the team that won the trophy made it to at least the conference finals 50% of the time.
Its almost a given that they will choke but they have ousted us the last two years with what I thought was beatable play. We only play when we want and the last two years we turn it on too late.
Last year was the closest playoffs series ever played (as far as goal diff).
Every year we've won the Cup we've had a reason and drive. '97-Duh, 52 years, '98-Konstantinov, '02- Maybe the best team ever (Robitaille and Duschene), '08-Dallas Drake, Cleary, most the players hadn't won. Now? You get the picture.
Drake is not the reason they won. Team defense, and Z and Dats playing superbly is the reason they won. Drake was nothing more than a nice story that has been blown way the f*** out of proportion.
I believe, because I've seen it for 15 years, that the Wings always have a chance and better than most teams. But only when they play like they really want it and we don't do that consistantly anymore.
I disagree.
- Travis, GoWings1905, Z Winged Dangler and 2 others like this
#19
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:32 PM
Edited by Wingydingy19, 09 February 2012 - 12:33 PM.
#20
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:51 PM
I don't see a big move happening because it's a sellers market now & will probably stay that way going into the trade deadline. I just don't see Kenny mortgaging the future to make a big splash. I don't doubt though that what Kenny might pull off is picking up a player off another team's scrap heap (think like a Brad Boyes in Buffalo) that flies under the radar at first but turns into a great deal at the end of the day.
exactly.
I could however see us getting a decent pickup in hemsky or ruutu or someone because we have much more cap space than usual but under the radar trades/signings that turn out to be great deals are more kenny's style.
Either way, with whatever happens at the deadline, we have a great chance at the cup. no doubt
Datsyukian
Dat·syu·ki·an [dat-soo-kee-uh n]
adjective
1. When your moves are so amazing and beyond reason, the only way to describe them is "datsyukian."
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Datsyuk has reportedly made decision on where we will sign after next |
Trade Rumors & Free Agent Talk | chances14 |
|
|
|
trade idea for next year |
General Discussion | nyqvististhefuture |
|
|
|
The person below me game...
|
Water Cooler | SouthernWingsFan |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
















