Empty Netterburg 0 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 With Mrazek showing he is good enough to be a NHL goalie, do we move Howard at the draft?? I see two options. The first option is to keep both goalies and have a healthy competition. If either one gets hurt, we have an above average backup. The negatives will be that there is no longer a solid number one and Howard's days are numbered. Is that fair to Howard? Do we want the highest paid backup in the game if Mrazek takes over? Option number 2 (which I prefer) would be to move Howard for a top 4 Dman. i feel like to the right team he would fetch a good return. There are plenty of teams who will need an improvement in goal (Toronto? Buffalo? Philidelphia? Oilers?) that i think would like Howard. Personally, I'd package Weiss with Howard so we can move that awful contract. I think it would be plausible to move him at the draft. One potential trade I could imagine working is to Toronto for Phanuef. We move Howard, Weiss (withhold 1.5 mil a year of contract) and a pick for Phanuef (they withold 2.0 mil a year of contract), Bernier/Reimer (for backup), and a prospect or pick (I don't know Toronto's system well enough). I think this would be an improvement simply because we wouldnt lose anything, and this is a great way to get Weiss gone which is going to a tough task for Howard. Do you guys think its time to move on from Howard? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Datsyukian-Deke 722 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) No. It's stupid to trade a player of his caliber when his stock is so low. He is better than he is playing right now. When he finds his game again then trade him and go with Mrazek. Trading him after this season would be a panic move. Edited April 2, 2015 by Datsyukian-Deke 4 wings4thecup06, Ally, Hockeymom1960 and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nightfall 871 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 Its time to give Mrazek a chance to carry the team, and its also time to see what happens when it comes to Howard. He isn't a top 5 goalie in the league, but he is still a good netminder. His career numbers carry a .916 save percentage and a 2.42 GAA. I really believe that Mrazek can equal or exceed those numbers, but I am not willing to bet the farm on him until he gets a full season under his belt. Keep Mrazek as the #1 through the playoffs this year and next year. Keep Howard as the backup. Have them compete against each other. Evaluate as needed. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,129 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 This thread could be EPIC! LOL! I am in the court of at least entertaining the idea of trading him, ONLY if it comes down to a cap issue. If there is no need to clear cap space, at least this off season, may as well keep him...BUT if Mrazek gets near $3M, is it wise to keep over $8M in goalies? I guess it all depends on which teams he'd waive his NTC to go to AND which above average back up goalies are available come July 1st. It would be nice if he'd waive his NTC to a team that we'd could score a #1/#2 defender from... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cnot19 191 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 I don't think Toronto would want him at this point by the time the team would be good his game would most likely be falling Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 Mrazek is a fresh 23. He should go back to the minors and work on his consistency, or split time with Jimmy until he's ready. 4 wings4thecup06, yztheman, Ally and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GMRwings1983 8,803 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 No. It's stupid to trade a player of his caliber when his stock is so low. He is better than he is playing right now. When he finds his game again then trade him and go with Mrazek. Trading him after this season would be a panic move. What caliber is that? Average caliber? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WingsallTheway 383 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 At the rate Mrazek plays regarding his consistency, he would finish the season 25-25 with 15 shutouts. We wouldnt make the playoffs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 5,129 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 Like I said, I'd entertain moving him only if the cap dictated and there was an above average back up out there to sign. But wouldn't it be great to move Weiss/Howard/Smith to Toronto for Phaneuf? Something tells me though, TO would NOT want all that contract money back! Who is on the blueline in Buffalo? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marcaractac 3,963 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 No. He needs to steal the jib and leave no doubt first. When we have a season with two clear number ones, our Mrazek just absolutely clearly and consistently becoming the better goalie, then move Howard. Sending Mrazek down to learn to be consistent is also a backwards option. He is dominant at the ahl leve. He can only learn at the the nhl level at this point. Hence why I think he should start in the playoffs if he finishes the season strong. For that experience. 1 roboturner reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cnot19 191 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 Like I said, I'd entertain moving him only if the cap dictated and there was an above average back up out there to sign. But wouldn't it be great to move Weiss/Howard/Smith to Toronto for Phaneuf? Something tells me though, TO would NOT want all that contract money back! Who is on the blueline in Buffalo? I think Toronto is more willing to push for some actual nhl players if the somehow win the lottery Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chaps80 1,591 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 LOL Holland would probably trade Mrazek first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WingsallTheway 383 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 LOL Holland would probably trade Mrazek first. I guarantee this 1 chaps80 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Greek 323 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 I would prefer to let him bring his stock back up, then we could trade him at next year's deadline. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DRW Dominance 255 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) Mrazek is a fresh 23. He should go back to the minors and work on his consistency, or split time with Jimmy until he's ready. i kinda agree but i don't see them splitting time. it's not like howard is 36 and ready to retire. i'd love to know what management is actually thinking regarding the tending right now Edited April 2, 2015 by DRW Dominance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nawein 324 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 He has a no move clause. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yztheman 29 Report post Posted April 2, 2015 No.!#@& (lolz) Jimmy has moments in the season where he doesn't perform as well as hoped but in D town we keep our guys turn them into tools instead of mercenaries..I have complete faith that Jimmy has 3 years left in him at least we may not see no Hasek performances for a couple more years when Maz is really ready but Jimmy still has game I sense the frustration with the lack of moves (until recently) is giving us an upgrade hangover..face it we slumped at the end instead of Dec/Jan/Feb as previous years...the boys will get in 8th seed or better remember the ssstttttttttrrrreeeeaaaaakkkkkkkkkk +++ we aren't legit contenders anyway no need for desperate measures retoool on the fly................... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aethernum 276 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 You can't move Howard (no move clause), and even if you could, why trade an asset when its worth has bottomed out? That's an illogical panic move; Holland has kept this franchise in the playoffs for two+ decades specifically by avoiding panic moves. Mrazek isn't ready for full-time, every night starts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hack & Whack Rule! 160 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 I read "Time to move Howard?" I thought "Why, is it 2013?" That was when I last really liked him. Since then he's just been okay, and only at times. Unfortunately, right now he sucks @$$ through a straw, so if anybody wants him, they'll offer a bag of warm pucks in trade. For now, I think his crappiness needs to be ridden out, and turf him when he's worth something. This is my opinion only, and should not be considered a truly educated view on the subject. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 I read "Time to move Howard?" I thought "Why, is it 2013?" That was when I last really liked him. Since then he's just been okay, and only at times. Unfortunately, right now he sucks @$$ through a straw, so if anybody wants him, they'll offer a bag of warm pucks in trade. For now, I think his crappiness needs to be ridden out, and turf him when he's worth something. This is my opinion only, and should not be considered a truly educated view on the subject. Jimmy Howard? The 2014/15 all star? 1 DSM reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hack & Whack Rule! 160 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 (edited) Jimmy Howard? The 2014/15 all star? Oh, I thought we were talking about Ron Howard. Yes, him. There have been a few "all stars" that didn't do much for me. Being in an all star game, even more than once, doesn't make you a superstar. I just haven't had the warm fuzzies for him for a couple seasons. To be fair, the comment about him only being okay, may be more of a bias towards his inconsistency, and the fact that he irritates the crap out of me with that. Edited April 3, 2015 by Hack & Whack Rule! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
number9 3,297 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 Oh, I thought we were talking about Ron Howard. Yes, him. There have been a few "all stars" that didn't do much for me. Being in an all star game, even more than once, doesn't make you a superstar. I just haven't had the warm fuzzies for him for a couple seasons. To be fair, the comment about him only being okay, may be more of a bias towards his inconsistency, and the fact that he irritates the crap out of me with that. Yeah, I don't think anyone thinks he's a superstar. Sorry about your warm fuzzies Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hack & Whack Rule! 160 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 Yeah, I don't think anyone thinks he's a superstar. Sorry about your warm fuzzies Well then, you've convinced me to change my mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kliq 3,763 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 With Mrazek showing he is good enough to be a NHL goalie, do we move Howard at the draft?? I see two options. The first option is to keep both goalies and have a healthy competition. If either one gets hurt, we have an above average backup. The negatives will be that there is no longer a solid number one and Howard's days are numbered. Is that fair to Howard? Do we want the highest paid backup in the game if Mrazek takes over? Option number 2 (which I prefer) would be to move Howard for a top 4 Dman. i feel like to the right team he would fetch a good return. There are plenty of teams who will need an improvement in goal (Toronto? Buffalo? Philidelphia? Oilers?) that i think would like Howard. Personally, I'd package Weiss with Howard so we can move that awful contract. I think it would be plausible to move him at the draft. One potential trade I could imagine working is to Toronto for Phanuef. We move Howard, Weiss (withhold 1.5 mil a year of contract) and a pick for Phanuef (they withold 2.0 mil a year of contract), Bernier/Reimer (for backup), and a prospect or pick (I don't know Toronto's system well enough). I think this would be an improvement simply because we wouldnt lose anything, and this is a great way to get Weiss gone which is going to a tough task for Howard. Do you guys think its time to move on from Howard? I'll be the first to admit, Howard's recent play has been very frustrating, but dont forget it was only 2 months ago that this guy was an all star and in the conversation for the Vezina. He got hurt and hasn't been the same since. Mrazek does appear to be our goalie of the future, but I'm not ready to go with him as "the guy" without a safety net just yet. I would want at least a full season of Mrazek playing high level hockey before I would even consider trading Howard. Plus, his value right now is at an all time low. Not the right time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Datsyukian-Deke 722 Report post Posted April 3, 2015 What caliber is that? Average caliber? The caliber of a player voted to the all-star team before getting injured. So All-star goalie caliber. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites