Leaderboard

Other than that fact that Lidstrom is still 9th among defensemen in points and 8th in +/-, I'm not saying that Lidstrom doesn't need to take a paycut. I'm just saying you're an idiot and your ideas for next year's salary seem to be drug-induced.

Except Boogaard doesnt do that kind of stuff, and neither do most heavys. Its the Avery, Ott, Tucker, Cooke and Tootoo's of the league this is aimed at.

A better move would be to get rid of the instigator rule, to weed out ******* like Matt Cooke from the NHL.

-29, this is great! I'm so flatted to have garnered so much attention. Apparently some in here are pretty self conscious of status or trying to be elite or really making a point of showing that they dislike some people.

Remember when Z could create on his own? You're talking about him like he's a 2nd line caliber player...

One second its blue, the next click its back to vintage LGW...lookin good! THanks

Crash the plane. That's too mean.

That experiment with the Sedins has worked. I admit I harped on ole Sammy everyonce and a while, but he was ******* money in the playoffs and talked and looked so funny you couldnt dislike the guy.

I'm not surprised this was the outcome. And watch - when they play next week, Cooke will mysteriously come up with an injury so he doesn't play in the game. How much do you wanna bet???

I agree, I thought Ericsson was very good last game.

I'd love to go to Boca Raton. That's as much as I want to contribute to the conversation.

Take away the instigator rule. Make players accountable, Cooke does this in the 70's to a talented player and he doesnt play again. Players have no respect for one another anymore, and it isnt just the instigator rule, but that's a part. Oh and the NHL is crap, Boogaard and Lapierre do similar things and face suspension but f***face Matt Cooke takes Savard out for the season and it's all fine and good?

1. Steve 2. Nick 3. Hank 4. Pavs 5. Drapes 6. D-Mac 7. Vladdy 8. Ozzie 9. Hasek 10. The Professor

Sammy is having a good year and anyone that wouldn't like to have him back needs to look at the standings. I hated his consistent PP shots into the shins of opposing defensemen, but he did score a lot of timely goals.

Wow, a -114 rating for myself presently. Seriously, I'm not all that special. Somebody honestly really needs to find better use of their time instead of just marking and spamming people's reputations on here up and down a bajillion points a day. I'll restate like on the previous page, I really don't care about my own status/rep thingy on here, it's just pretty pitiful and humorous the attention somebody is giving me regarding it. More of me being curious. Are there different filters or rules you can set on the reputation level if it is kept, or is this the best way the Web site environment works as it is presently laid out Matt? Because I wouldn't be too shocked if every now and then you're just going to have members who just don't like others (or overly like some people perhaps), and want to spam somebody's rep level to absurd numbers. It's happened to me two days in a row now. And I personally don't care and am not crying about it in terms of bad reputation, I think it could actually be a fun feature if used better/not spammed, just something else possibly worth considering whenever you get close to wrapping the Web site up. EDIT: To further and quickly add after I skimmed a few threads I typically go in most days being naturally curious, it's sad when you are the only one getting - rep posts, or reputation posts of any kind, in the Water Cooler when there is no other activity in there regarding the reputation status, either + or -. Random threads in the water cooler that have pretty much nothing to do with anything and are about as unharmful and non-offensive to people as it can get. There's no reason to really use the reputation feature in those threads over and over again since those threads aren't offending or don't have much to do with hockey talk typically.

In which he proceeded to tell you this: "Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk I'm a woman's man: no time to talk"

Negative 1 now... yay! now I don't feel left out. P.S. Love the new smiley/emoticons window.

None, as they're all US born. Isn't there enough glow in Canada to bask in? Nevermind that the teams went 1-1 in the tournament and the second game was close enough that either team could have taken it at any second, let's talk about how inferior the US team was. Christ.

You want some too?

Darn right. Suspensions will be doled out like candy to anyone who rates us negatively. (And before anyone asks, No, of course I'm not serious, = joking)

What will a bronze membership look like and I can I have mine?

I don't know where to find my reputation....oh well. I don't care about it enough either way to dig too deep.

Wow, -16 now. This is funny!

I don't think Kimmy played that good / confident since the OG. Why not give Chris Osgood a game ? And why do some people keep talking about " a risk " when it comes to Ozzie. The man is able of winning some games, have we forgotten that ? And please stop talking about his form or achievements, because his last full game was somewhere in december. Whatever the outcome of this season is, Babcock has handled this poorly.