which is why, IMO, that Holland should've went with D instead of Zadina. I get the whole "Zadina was projected #3" stuff, I get it, but you don't get a shot at a Quinn Hughes/Evan Bouchard at every draft. The draft usually has more quality forwards available in the teens and 20's than D, I feel our team would've been in a better situation by drafting, let's say, Hughes, Veleno, McIsaac instead of Zadina. He has a lot of nets to fill to make up for us not taking D. With my history, I feel that I am going to scrutinize him for his entire career if he doesn't. I hope not, , but you all know how bad I was with Hossa v. Franzen! To me, my unfair high expectations is going to be 35+ goals a year and 10+ per playoff year(s) in order to make up for not drafting D. But again, that is just going by my past, I hope that I am not that critical anymore and when/if he does well, I just enjoy the 6 out of 9 Stanley Cups we'll be celebrating in the coming years! (wouldn't that be nice!)
Bottom line is, life is full of "what-ifs" we have to move forward no matter what. What if we were able to draft Bure when we tried to, what if Gretzky chose Detroit instead of LA, what if the limo hadn't crashed, what if Marty Lapointe took less money to stay here, what if The Isles took Heatley instead of DePietro, what if they didn't take LaFontaine and Devellano did..what if the moon were made of cheese (would you eat it?) what if life was fair to everyone....you get it. In the history of drafts, there have been more busts than booms.
Here's to hoping that Zadina IS filling nets in the NHL SOON and that the four D you mentioned above ARE legit NHL starters and a couple of stars too! We only need ONE "Elite" D along with 2 or 3 2nd tier stars, we've proven that already. Establish who is elite, build him a nice cast of supporting talented line-mates and we're golden.