RusDRW 155 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 I just took a look at the last two goals Pulkkinen scored. Those are unbelievable shots. We saved ourselves a better player in this trade. 3 nyqvististhefuture, wingedominance13 and DatsyukianDekes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wings_Toledo 233 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 The Wings desperately needed a center, Holland went out and got the best one available for this team. We don't know if he had to add Jarnkrok or that 3rd rounder because some other team also made an offer and that was what it took to make the trade. What's done is done and now this team has a fighting chance to make the playoffs. I just hope Legwand re-signs after this season because that would give this team incredible center depth when healthy. 3 sjr2012, DatsyukianDekes and wingedominance13 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 I just took a look at the last two goals Pulkkinen scored. Those are unbelievable shots. We saved ourselves a better player in this trade. Not a question of saving a player over the other .... Jarnkrok pulkkinen "coulda" been a nice duo ....we'll likely have to draft his future center linemate now unless sheahan keeps progressing and becomes a top 6 but I don't see him as a playmaking center .... Maybe we can target backstrom if he ever becomes a ufa 1 drw138 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Echolalia 2,961 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 (edited) I don't know how much stock is put into Khan on the boards but I personally think he's one of the more reputable sports writers in the area. Anyway, he mentioned that the deal was finalized one minute before the deadline in this article: http://www.mlive.com/redwings/index.ssf/2014/03/david_legwand_excited_to_retur.html Excerpt: "[Legwand] said he first heard of the potential deal at 12:30 p.m. Wednesday and it was completed a minute before the 3 p.m. deadline." If that's the case it sounds like there wasn't much room for haggling. It may have been Jarnkrok, 2nd/3rd and Eaves or no deal. Edited March 9, 2014 by Echolalia Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DickieDunn 2,571 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 Yeah, it was finished right before 3:00, but Holland said he called Poile around 12:30. That's plenty of time to talk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Echolalia 2,961 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 Yeah, it was finished right before 3:00, but Holland said he called Poile around 12:30. That's plenty of time to talk.I'm sure there was lots of talking, but even if these talks started two weeks ago, if a deal isn't finalized until the last possible minute, it tells me one side isn't happy with what's on the table, and is agreeing only from necessity. If Holland was truly happy settling with Jarnkrok, 2nd/3rd and Eaves, the deal probably would have been submitted sooner. In all likelyhood, Holland was trying to work Polie down and Polie wasn't budging. Of course this is all speculation on my part, so who knows what actually happened, but I still think the last minute deal submission is telling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DickieDunn 2,571 Report post Posted March 9, 2014 Or Poile was set on getting Sproul or one of the younger guys on the Wings roster instead of Jarnkrok and Holland wouldn't budge so Poile caved at the last minute. The people unhappy with the deal are basing it on the idea that because Jarnkrok is going to be a top line center because he was their best center prospect and the idea that Holland didn't work Poile down from what was asked for. We don't know either is true, but based on Holland's comments the Wings didn't necessarily view him as likely to reach that high end potential. 1 Internet.Unknown reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uncle ovipositor 6 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 And at least 6 of the trades in that chart are for Samuelson. The Wings have done pretty well as a team focussed on drafting, not trading. The last couple of years they've needed some trades, but they haven't pulled it off well - I mean, I'm sure Tootoo was a bargain, but he's also still Jordin Tootoo. Legwand seems like a good deal to me, and even if he's not a fix for everything that's wrong with the team he might be a sign that Holland's getting better at that part of the job. Having a cap makes where players are willing to go a bigger factor (see: Edmonton), and while a lot of players might not want to live in Detroit, this is the sort of hockey team that can make a move worth it just based on that. That said, missing the playoffs would adversely affect that formula. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Or Poile was set on getting Sproul or one of the younger guys on the Wings roster instead of Jarnkrok and Holland wouldn't budge so Poile caved at the last minute. The people unhappy with the deal are basing it on the idea that because Jarnkrok is going to be a top line center because he was their best center prospect and the idea that Holland didn't work Poile down from what was asked for. We don't know either is true, but based on Holland's comments the Wings didn't necessarily view him as likely to reach that high end potential. Doubt Nashville went for a defensemen seeing as there main area of concern is scoring ... Defensemen wise there more than fine I won't pay attention to Hollands comments obviously he's gonna make it sound like we didn't give up much .... You think people would be happy if he said we think jarnkrok is gonna be a big time player in this League but we needed immediate help now due to pav being out as well as helm and hank .... People would of been pissed off Tis way it's like we gave up some chump bottom 6 guy and people are like ya cool whatever then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Doubt Nashville went for a defensemen seeing as there main area of concern is scoring ... Defensemen wise there more than fine I won't pay attention to Hollands comments obviously he's gonna make it sound like we didn't give up much .... You think people would be happy if he said we think jarnkrok is gonna be a big time player in this League but we needed immediate help now due to pav being out as well as helm and hank .... People would of been pissed off Tis way it's like we gave up some chump bottom 6 guy and people are like ya cool whatever then Because maybe he's not ? He will most likely be a 40-60 point 2nd line center. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Because maybe he's not ? He will most likely be a 40-60 point 2nd line center. Ok Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dave 324 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Because maybe he's not ? He will most likely be a 40-60 point 2nd line center. Dude, don't even try. It's like slamming your head against a brick wall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) Because maybe he's not ? He will most likely be a 40-60 point 2nd line center. Doubt Nashville went for a defensemen seeing as there main area of concern is scoring ... Defensemen wise there more than fine I won't pay attention to Hollands comments obviously he's gonna make it sound like we didn't give up much .... You think people would be happy if he said we think jarnkrok is gonna be a big time player in this League but we needed immediate help now due to pav being out as well as helm and hank .... People would of been pissed off Tis way it's like we gave up some chump bottom 6 guy and people are like ya cool whatever then I don't know how any of you could possibly know what type of player he's going to be one way or another. People used to have the same arguments about Tatar and Nyquist, and before that Filppula and Hudler. Fact is, you just don't know this early in his career what type of player he's going to be. Secondly, it's entirely possible that he could be BOTH a big time player in the NHL as one of you suggested and a 40-60 pt. player as the other suggested. If Jarnkrok was scoring 25-30 goals a season and another 25-30 assists PLUS good defense wouldn't that make him a "big time player"? Stop arguing, neither of you know what he'll turn into and truthfully you're both pretty close to each other when you decide to speculate what he'll be. Truth is, we traded long term potential for short term gain. Apparently Holland believed it was preferable to lose the potential of a top flight center (Jarnkrok's upside) for a chance to sneak into the playoffs this year. Personally, I think it's a bad decision but you're welcome to disagree. But to try and make it seem like Jarnkrok was a B prospect, or that Legwand is a horrible trade (or a savior of one), is both incorrect and intellectually beneath each of you. Edited March 10, 2014 by kipwinger 2 nyqvististhefuture and Wingsfan72 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NYC Wings Fanatic 23 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) I don't know how any of you could possibly know what type of player he's going to be one way or another. People used to have the same arguments about Tatar and Nyquist, and before that Filppula and Hudler. Fact is, you just don't know this early in his career what type of player he's going to be. Secondly, it's entirely possible that he could be BOTH a big time player in the NHL as one of you suggested and a 40-60 pt. player as the other suggested. If Jarnkrok was scoring 25-30 goals a season and another 25-30 assists PLUS good defense wouldn't that make him a "big time player"? Stop arguing, neither of you know what he'll turn into and truthfully you're both pretty close to each other when you decide to speculate what he'll be. Truth is, we traded long term potential for short term gain. Apparently Holland believed it was preferable to lose the potential of a top flight center (Jarnkrok's upside) for a chance to sneak into the playoffs this year. Personally, I think it's a bad decision but you're welcome to disagree. But to try and make it seem like Jarnkrok was a B prospect, or that Legwand is a horrible trade (or a savior of one), is both incorrect and intellectually beneath each of you. I am of the camp that believes that prospects, as tantalizing as they are, are never a sure thing. The Wings are trying desperately to keep the playoff appearance streak alive, and in many ways, aside from this being hockey credentials based, I think that they also see this as a business /marketing goal in promoting the Wings "brand". Granted, Jarnkrok seems to have excellent skills, but we all know how far skill alone takes a player (Jiri Hudler, Ville Leino, Damien Brunner, Fabian Brunnstrom, etc). There are many players who on paper look incredibly intriguing, with lots of potential that never gets realized due to all kinds of X factors that we are never aware of as fans. I do think that KH did "overpay" in pure value for value, but I also think that he felt that his hands were tied, and that the need for a good, although not great center who was available and resignable was too great need at this time. The perfect storm of injuries this year was discouraging to see, but maybe the Wings can put on a burst like last year and give us some degree of consolation going into these playoffs. Edited March 10, 2014 by NYC Wings Fanatic 1 Internet.Unknown reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslionstigers 12 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Please tell more more about how Jarnkrok in the past 2 years was showing any signs of becoming a top six forward. Sweden WC-A stats over two years, 2 points in 19 games. Probability of success C, Talent 7.5. A couple years ago he was highly praised for his potential, he hasn't lived up to his potential so far. WHY do you people think he was SO good? Please give me legit sources claiming he was going to take Zetterbergs spot or be anything close to that.He was worth Legwand, especially the situation the team is in needing a center so badly if we have any hope of making the playoffs. You guys just don't understand the side effects of this team missing the playoffs for the first time in 23 years and how it will affect our young guys. Who we are training to become winners. You really want this teams mindset next year to get back into the playoffs? Or do you want it to be make the playoffs for the 24th time and continue and hand off that tradition to our young guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 I don't know how any of you could possibly know what type of player he's going to be one way or another. People used to have the same arguments about Tatar and Nyquist, and before that Filppula and Hudler. Fact is, you just don't know this early in his career what type of player he's going to be. Secondly, it's entirely possible that he could be BOTH a big time player in the NHL as one of you suggested and a 40-60 pt. player as the other suggested. If Jarnkrok was scoring 25-30 goals a season and another 25-30 assists PLUS good defense wouldn't that make him a "big time player"? Stop arguing, neither of you know what he'll turn into and truthfully you're both pretty close to each other when you decide to speculate what he'll be. Truth is, we traded long term potential for short term gain. Apparently Holland believed it was preferable to lose the potential of a top flight center (Jarnkrok's upside) for a chance to sneak into the playoffs this year. Personally, I think it's a bad decision but you're welcome to disagree. But to try and make it seem like Jarnkrok was a B prospect, or that Legwand is a horrible trade (or a savior of one), is both incorrect and intellectually beneath each of you. Again nothing against legwand he was the forward I was aiming at us getting but what really pissed me off is how everyone's acting like jarnkrok was some useless bum and not one of our top prospects for yrs and yes again I'm happy legwand is here but I do think we overpaid and my own personal believe is we could of found another way to of landed him ... It's clear he wanted to come here Now like you said he might be a nobody or he might be a star or a 50-60 pt guy ..... Which I'd take btw ... Isn't that what we're hoping to get from filppula all these years? If janrkrok becomes a 15goals 50-60 pt type player we lost And like you also mentioned management were iffy on nyquist and Tatar and wasn't sheahan suppose to e a 3rd-4th line guy? Still way too early but he's sure as he'll showing he can play way better than they expected Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Please tell more more about how Jarnkrok in the past 2 years was showing any signs of becoming a top six forward. Sweden WC-A stats over two years, 2 points in 19 games. Probability of success C, Talent 7.5. A couple years ago he was highly praised for his potential, he hasn't lived up to his potential so far. WHY do you people think he was SO good? Please give me legit sources claiming he was going to take Zetterbergs spot or be anything close to that. He was worth Legwand, especially the situation the team is in needing a center so badly if we have any hope of making the playoffs. You guys just don't understand the side effects of this team missing the playoffs for the first time in 23 years and how it will affect our young guys. Who we are training to bec ome winners. You really want this teams mindset next year to get back into the playoffs? Or do you want it to be make the playoffs for the 24th time and continue and hand off that tradition to our young guys. He was one of the better players in the swedish elite league for a few yrs and helped win the championship for his team ....and one thing no one seems to have mentioned is this is his first year in North America it takes times for European players to adjust to the smaller rinks Our own lidstrom said it took him a whole year to adjust to the nhl and he's a hall of fame player and a legend and were ready to say jarnkrok is a bust after 40 or so games? I just think it's a big risk to ship him when he's finally turning things around As for his weight there's nhl players who are shorter and weight less who are pretty good Anyways like Kip said only time will tell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslionstigers 12 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 I do think we overpaid and my own personal believe is we could of found another way to of landed him Yeah because the trade didn't finish and submit to the league within 1 minute of the dead line. Now like you said he might be a nobody or he might be a star or a 50-60 pt guy ..... Which I'd take btw ... Isn't that what we're hoping to get from filppula all these years? If janrkrok becomes a 15goals 50-60 pt type player we lost At base case scenario he becomes as good as Legwand is now? Yeah we really lost that one. He was one of the better players in the swedish elite league for a few yrs and helped win the championship for his team ....and one thing no one seems to have mentioned is this is his first year in North America it takes times for European players to adjust to the smaller rinks Our own lidstrom said it took him a whole year to adjust to the nhl and he's a hall of fame player and a legend and were ready to say jarnkrok is a bust after 40 or so games? I just think it's a big risk to ship him when he's finally turning things around As for his weight there's nhl players who are shorter and weight less who are pretty good Anyways like Kip said only time will tell No I'm judging him because he didn't perform at the world cup and was a 4th line player. You know that thing were all great NHL players performed well at? That's where you get a look at your players for the first time and how they compete with and against other highly praised NHL prospects. That's where Jarnkrok lost value and its for good reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslionstigers 12 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Who else do you think we could have traded? You want to trade Mantha, Tatar, Jurco? Who? You have to at least give some value. You can't trade a player that has absolutely no chance of becoming an NHL player. We don't have to much left for forwards that have any trade value. We have D but we can't afford to give up D prospects. Jarnkrok was one of the lower prospects on forward we had that has some value and some potential. Jarnkrok was expendable. We have 600 centers that are going to be around for a few years. I don't think we are going to have all of them injured again like this. This year has been a real unlucky season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) The trade came in at 259 cause Poile did his job and holland caved just like snow did with vanek .... Legwand is 33 and a ufa , jarnkrok is 22 .... Yes we lost that one You said it yourself he was on the 4th line and he was one of the younger players so I doubt he got much ice time Legwand is a 33 yr old ufa who's clearly not a top liner and of those 3 you mentioned as well as jarnkrok is over payment .... If Matt moulson fetched 2 2nd rounders i think it would of fetched legwand as well .... A 3rd round pick becomes a 2nd if we miss the playoffs .... 2 2nd rounders and eaves would of been more than enough in my opinion Well never know now If jarnkrok is expendable as you say we would of been better off putting Him in a package deal for a defensemen we needed not for legwand Edited March 10, 2014 by nyqvististhefuture Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslionstigers 12 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 If jarnkrok is expendable as you say we would of been better off putting Him in a package deal for a defensemen we needed not for legwand I'm done arguing with you about the rest of the stuff because we been over it all 10 times.. But this part shows you clearly have no credibility in knowing what your talking about. It won't get the point across to you but everyone else reading will see it. We WERE going to get a defense-men until we lost all of our centers to injury. A center is MUCH more important than a D in order for this team to make the playoffs. The D we have now can get the job done just like they did last year, the centers we are left with could not. Franzen was being used as a our first line center and Andersson was centering our second line. You do realize how little games are left and our centers are going to be out most of the season if not all of it. You do realize how important centers are right? You do realize center is the most important role on the team to have quality players filling the position? You cannot win in the NHL without decent centers. We have no choice but to get a very capable center if we are going to make the playoffs. Picking up a D would have not helped us much. Our D isn't the best but it's an NHL caliber core that can get the job done. The centers we had left injury free were not NHL caliber. Do you understand hockey? Do you understand how important it is for this franchise to make the playoffs? Whether we make it or not we had to make a move to give ourselves a chance. Holland did exactly that, he made a move that gives us a chance and he made a good one. It was a move that HAD to be made. We don't trade often like the chart on the last page indicates, but we had to do this. It is a business and this business has a lot on the line. 2 sjr2012 and wings4thecup06 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,755 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 Yeah because the trade didn't finish and submit to the league within 1 minute of the dead line. At base case scenario he becomes as good as Legwand is now? Yeah we really lost that one. No I'm judging him because he didn't perform at the world cup and was a 4th line player. You know that thing were all great NHL players performed well at? That's where you get a look at your players for the first time and how they compete with and against other highly praised NHL prospects. That's where Jarnkrok lost value and its for good reason. He didn't perform well in 19 games in the World Championships (which is made up of junior players) but did perform well in more than 19 games in the AHL (made up of professionals). I'm not sure what your point is here? That a couple years ago, in a small sub-sample, he didn't perform well? Agreed. But it's equally true that he's now playing much better hockey in a much more difficult league. Any value he lost (not sure he did), he regained by being a stud over his last 36 games with the Griffins. 2 nyqvististhefuture and Dabura reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nyqvististhefuture 1,002 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 He didn't perform well in 19 games in the World Championships (which is made up of junior players) but did perform well in more than 19 games in the AHL (made up of professionals). I'm not sure what your point is here? That a couple years ago, in a small sub-sample, he didn't perform well? Agreed. But it's equally true that he's now playing much better hockey in a much more difficult league. Any value he lost (not sure he did), he regained by being a stud over his last 36 games with the Griffins. Nice to see we agree on something for once lol I'm done arguing with you about the rest of the stuff because we been over it all 10 times.. But this part shows you clearly have no credibility in knowing what your talking about. It won't get the point across to you but everyone else reading will see it. We WERE going to get a defense-men until we lost all of our centers to injury. A center is MUCH more important than a D in order for this team to make the playoffs. The D we have now can get the job done just like they did last year, the centers we are left with could not. Franzen was being used as a our first line center and Andersson was centering our second line. You do realize how little games are left and our centers are going to be out most of the season if not all of it. You do realize how important centers are right? You do realize center is the most important role on the team to have quality players filling the position? You cannot win in the NHL without decent centers. We have no choice but to get a very capable center if we are going to make the playoffs. Picking up a D would have not helped us much. Our D isn't the best but it's an NHL caliber core that can get the job done. The centers we had left injury free were not NHL caliber. Do you understand hockey? Do you understand how important it is for this franchise to make the playoffs? Whether we make it or not we had to make a move to give ourselves a chance. Holland did exactly that, he made a move that gives us a chance and he made a good one. It was a move that HAD to be made. We don't trade often like the chart on the last page indicates, but we had to do this. It is a business and this business has a lot on the line. Like you I'm done we will never agree with one another . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 If you'd like to guarantee that your post gets deleted, please be sure to include statements about people crying and complaining. If you'd like to actually discuss the trade, feel free and keep it within forum rules. On the other hand if you feel the topic has been beat to death, simply don't post in the thread. 1 wingedominance13 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nawein 324 Report post Posted March 10, 2014 If you'd like to guarantee that your post gets deleted, please be sure to include statements about people crying and complaining. If you'd like to actually discuss the trade, feel free and keep it within forum rules. On the other hand if you feel the topic has been beat to death, simply don't post in the thread. My apologies. My point was simply that the trade was of a benefit to us now because our C group looks substantially better with Legwand as opposed to entirely taken from GR. 1 DatsyukianDekes reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites