DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 I'd love to agree but I just can't. Yes, we probably could and should have beaten Tampa, but they've really progressed a lot since the Detroit series, and have played much better to get to where they are. I'm dubious about Detroit getting over the line against any of Montreal, New York or Chicago. Edit: And FWIW - I'm still supremely confident the Bolts will take the Cup with much less trouble than everyone thinks. So only Tampa can get better as the playoffs go along? Also, what makes you think Detroit didn't have any part in shutting down Tampa instead of Tampa just not playing well at the beginning of the playoffs? If I remember Detroit took out Anaheim and almost Chicago a couple years ago and we heard the same thing then. We have two elite two way players, maybe just maybe that had something to do with containing most of Tampa's offense. 1 rick zombo reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xtrememachine1 795 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Tampa bay > Chicago.. You could say this the whole series actually... Yeah, kind of surprising actually. If it wasn't for the Game 1 collapse, TB's up 3-0. I thought the Hawks talent and especially experience would have given them a better start to this series. I was expecting a Wings/Pens 2008 type of series. Which is all great, except they're a bunch of dix. I'm pulling for Chicago. If Chicago wins, it will be gross, but I'll except it because that's what they've been doing and that's what's supposed to happen. It will be really painful if Tampa wins this series because it could have been Detroit. It'll be less painful for our most bitter rival to win their 3rd championship in 6 years than to have our Captain get his name on the Stanley Cup again, all because they beat us and it could have been us there? I suppose anything could happen, we could have made it to the Finals, but it was the first round. Its not like it was the Conference Finals or something. A lot would have had to happen for us to get that far. The Wings matched up well with TB. Can't say the same about Montreal, they were a team that TB owned. I'm over our loss. I'm even over Cooper and his whining and their fanbase. The Lightning have had their moments of jerkiness during these playoffs, but it's nothing compared to Chicago that chants "Detroit sucks" in their sleep. 2 krsmith17 and roboturner reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Yeah, kind of surprising actually. If it wasn't for the Game 1 collapse, TB's up 3-0. I thought the Hawks talent and especially experience would have given them a better start to this series. I was expecting a Wings/Pens 2008 type of series. It'll be less painful for our most bitter rival to win their 3rd championship in 6 years than to have our Captain get his name on the Stanley Cup again, all because they beat us and it could have been us there? I suppose anything could happen, we could have made it to the Finals, but it was the first round. Its not like it was the Conference Finals or something. A lot would have had to happen for us to get that far. The Wings matched up well with TB. Can't say the same about Montreal, they were a team that TB owned. I'm over our loss. I'm even over Cooper and his whining and their fanbase. The Lightning have had their moments of jerkiness during these playoffs, but it's nothing compared to Chicago that chants "Detroit sucks" in their sleep. For me? Yes. The Chicago - Detroit rivalry will eventually die. Just like the Colorado - Detroit rivalry did. Tampa should be as much or more of a rivalry as the Hawks. The Wings are already playing more important games against Tampa. That's not going to change. 2 kipwinger and e_prime reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
e_prime 1,936 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 For as much as I hate Chicago fans. I don't hate their team. 1 Ram reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladdy16 2,154 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 For me? Yes. The Chicago - Detroit rivalry will eventually die. Just like the Colorado - Detroit rivalry did. Tampa should be as much or more of a rivalry as the Hawks. The Wings are already playing more important games against Tampa. That's not going to change. The Chicago rivalry will never die, much like the Detroit/Toronto rivalry never did. We pass it from generation to generation. 4 amato, haroldsnepsts, Hockeymom1960 and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 The Chicago rivalry will never die, much like the Detroit/Toronto rivalry never did. We pass it from generation to generation. Well perhaps it should die, because what they do as an organization has little bearing on the Wings. Caring a hate-torch for the Hawks is petty. It's what Chicago did when they were jealous of Detroit for 20 years. I don't want that going the other way while they're on top as Detroit retools. So, unless they're beating the Wings in the Cup final, or keeping them from making the playoffs, I'll reserve my loathing for teams like Tampa, Montreal, Boston, and eventually Florida and Buffalo. But this is just how I feel. Personal preference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
haroldsnepsts 4,826 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Well perhaps it should die, because what they do as an organization has little bearing on the Wings. Caring a hate-torch for the Hawks is petty. It's what Chicago did when they were jealous of Detroit for 20 years. I don't want that going the other way while they're on top as Detroit retools. So, unless they're beating the Wings in the Cup final, or keeping them from making the playoffs, I'll reserve my loathing for teams like Tampa, Montreal, Boston, and eventually Florida and Buffalo. But this is just how I feel. Personal preference. How is hating the Blackhawks more petty than hating any other team in the league? Hatred isn't rational. It's part of being a fan and having rivalries. For me it's not only deeply ingrained from the longstanding Wings rivalry, but it's also that their current roster has several players who are pretty easy to hate compared to the Lightning. Then throw their fanbase on top of it and it comes pretty easily. If I'm picking a team I'd want to win the Cup that's not the Wings, between the Blackhawks and Tampa, it's a pretty easy choice. If only to make Eddie Olczyk shed tears that subtly interfere with his happiness. 5 McAwesome, Hockeymom1960, krsmith17 and 2 others reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladdy16 2,154 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Well perhaps it should die, because what they do as an organization has little bearing on the Wings. Caring a hate-torch for the Hawks is petty. It's what Chicago did when they were jealous of Detroit for 20 years. I don't want that going the other way while they're on top as Detroit retools. So, unless they're beating the Wings in the Cup final, or keeping them from making the playoffs, I'll reserve my loathing for teams like Tampa, Montreal, Boston, and eventually Florida and Buffalo. But this is just how I feel. Personal preference. You're confusing a rivalry with petty jealousy. They have nothing to do with each other. One is a long-standing competitive, contentious relationship and the other is just being a ******. I'm old enough to appreciate our rivalries with Chicago and Toronto. You're obviously not, and weren't raised by hockey fans I'm guessing? Trust me - any hockey fan from my generation in Detroit, Toronto and Chicago has taught their children about these rivalries, just as Red Sox fans and Yankee fans have taught their children. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
martinezsvsu 240 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Just because we changed our conference doesn't mean we should just forget everything 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 You're confusing a rivalry with petty jealousy. They have nothing to do with each other. One is a long-standing competitive, contentious relationship and the other is just being a ******. I'm old enough to appreciate our rivalries with Chicago and Toronto. You're obviously not, and weren't raised by hockey fans I'm guessing? Trust me - any hockey fan from my generation in Detroit, Toronto and Chicago has taught their children about these rivalries, just as Red Sox fans and Yankee fans have taught their children. I'm 40. Played hockey for 15 years and was born into a Red Wings household. Way to make it pesonal even after I went out of my way to say that it was just my opinion and personal preference. I expected more out of a mod. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladdy16 2,154 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Oh. My. God. That was not personal at all. It was a guess based on your perceptions. Apparently I was wrong. That's not even in the ballpark of being a personal attack and certainly wasn't meant to insult you. And I have to ask, what does you playing hockey have to do with anything I said? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 Oh. My. God. That was not personal at all. It was a guess based on your perceptions. Apparently I was wrong. That's not even in the ballpark of being a personal attack and certainly wasn't meant to insult you. And I have to ask, what does you playing hockey have to do with anything I said? It has as much to do with anything as my age, family hockey orientation, favourite brand of bell-bottom jeans, the amount of Kiss records I have stashed under my coffee table, or whatever else you seem to think applies to my qualifications to speak substaintially about hockey rivalries. I didn't say it was an attack. But you defintely tried to make your point my including assumptions about my age and up-bringing. Both of which are personal things. It would be like me saying this: "you must be like 60 if you remember the last time Toronto and Detroit played for anything more important than that one series in 1992". But I don't assume this. 2 jimmyemeryhunter and Echolalia reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Helmethead 235 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 (edited) It was 1993. I still have nightmares of Nick Borshevsky. 92 the Wings were swept by the Hawks. Edited June 9, 2015 by Helmethead Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rick zombo 3,739 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 It was 1993. I still have nightmares of Nick Borshevsky. 92 the Wings were swept by the Hawks. You're right. My bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr Dubya 32 Report post Posted June 9, 2015 So only Tampa can get better as the playoffs go along? Also, what makes you think Detroit didn't have any part in shutting down Tampa instead of Tampa just not playing well at the beginning of the playoffs? If I remember Detroit took out Anaheim and almost Chicago a couple years ago and we heard the same thing then. We have two elite two way players, maybe just maybe that had something to do with containing most of Tampa's offense. I never said any of that lol. Take it easy. But Tampa's roster is far and away better than Detroit's. So I would guess they'd generally fare better than Detroit would. Surely you can't seriously think Detroit has a Stanley Cup roster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DatsyukianDekes 2,428 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 I never said any of that lol. Take it easy. But Tampa's roster is far and away better than Detroit's. So I would guess they'd generally fare better than Detroit would. Surely you can't seriously think Detroit has a Stanley Cup roster. Why do they need to have a Stanley Cup roster? Many teams get hot at the right time and go to the finals; Devils just did it three years ago. How many teams in the past beat Detroit that didn't have a Stanley Cup roster? Plenty. That's just how the game works. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr Dubya 32 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 Why do they need to have a Stanley Cup roster? Many teams get hot at the right time and go to the finals; Devils just did it three years ago. How many teams in the past beat Detroit that didn't have a Stanley Cup roster? Plenty. That's just how the game works. The Devils had a decent roster in a terrible conference. Kinda like the Hawks this year. The East was stacked with contendors this year. Detroit wasn't one of them. Sorry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhah 195 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 Just in case you forgot about the Hawks/Wings.. some images from 2013 playoffs. Bickell plastering Hank Rozsival smashing Abby's head: Slewfoot-gate: Shaw elbowing Kindl: Let me know when you are sufficiently mad at the Hawks again. Thanks. 1 Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmyemeryhunter 2,747 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 Ha. I still hate the hawks. But I also hate Tampa. The hating of the hawks is etched into me, which I'm working on. I do like Toews, honestly. His playoff beard, not so Much. I guess I don't care about this series as much as I care about hockey lasting as long as possible into the summer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frankgrimes 1,836 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 This isn't even a question for me, I do like guys like Keith, Toews but I hate the hawks plus I really like Tampa but boy the style in the finals is boring they lack physicality and hatred for the opponent Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ram 240 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 Pulling for the Yzerbolts to take a 3-1 lead tonight. I do not hate the Hawks as a team - they are phenomenal. I just simply do not want to deal with them in dynasty talk if they win 3 of 5. They deserve it, but I will never root for them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrasco 1,312 Report post Posted June 10, 2015 Just in case you forgot about the Hawks/Wings.. some images from 2013 playoffs. Slewfoot-gate: I forgot about that slew foot. Fil missed the rest of game 7 from that too IIRC. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marcaractac 3,963 Report post Posted June 11, 2015 CBC is gone all Vince Vaughn theme night with this game. Ughhhhhh....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HadThomasVokounOnFortSt 878 Report post Posted June 11, 2015 Kinda nice to see a couple blue in the stands... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hockeytown0001 7,652 Report post Posted June 11, 2015 What's Bishop's injury? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
