Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 I feel like you guys don't take the red wings seriously anymore and im pretty just PO'ed about it, c'mon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dabura 12,207 Report post Posted February 21 14 minutes ago, Troy McClure said: I feel like you guys don't take the red wings seriously anymore and im pretty just PO'ed about it, c'mon Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios (Chelios, Chelios) Chelios Chelios Chelios Lebda Chelios Chelios (Chelios) Chelios (Chelios) 1 Motor City Mullets reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 10 minutes ago, Dabura said: Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios (Chelios, Chelios) Chelios Chelios Chelios Lebda Chelios Chelios (Chelios) Chelios (Chelios) Someone is overly prepared for Sunday 1 Dabura reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,015 Report post Posted February 21 Dreger saying Dallas, Wings, Jersey are in on Tanev. Detroit's looking at D. Chris Johnston saying Hanifin will go to an American team. https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/insider-trading-noah-hanifin-expected-to-be-dealt-south-of-the-border-1.2078826 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 11 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: Dreger saying Dallas, Wings, Jersey are in on Tanev. Detroit's looking at D. Chris Johnston saying Hanifin will go to an American team. https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/insider-trading-noah-hanifin-expected-to-be-dealt-south-of-the-border-1.2078826 I guess I'm not surprised. We need RHD more than we do LHD. Tanev is just a pure rental thou... hoping the price is low. I read oilers and leafs refused to offer their 1st for him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,015 Report post Posted February 21 2015 Tampa were a bubble team nearing TDL but Yzerman threw them a bone and traded for Coburn. They went to the finals Coburn also score the game 7 winner vs Wings in 16. So f*** him really and my story. 1 Dabura reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 29 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: 2015 Tampa were a bubble team nearing TDL but Yzerman threw them a bone and traded for Coburn. They went to the finals Coburn also score the game 7 winner vs Wings in 16. So f*** him really and my story. Conburn also stayed for 5+ more years and became a burden for them about half way into that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,015 Report post Posted February 21 Just now, Troy McClure said: Conburn also stayed for 5+ more years and became a burden for them about half way into that like I said f*** that guy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 3 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: like I said f*** that guy So do you want to trade for the guy you compared him to or not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 4,967 Report post Posted February 21 Meh, I'm Luke warm on Tanev. 1 Motor City Mullets reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 4,967 Report post Posted February 21 (edited) This is why I don't see a rental coming here. Tanev just doesn't make sense at this time, but Chychrun or Hanifin does. I'm still adding Andersson in there, although I never hear his name out there as a trade target. Again, G's are different. Markstrom wouldn't be a rental with 2 years left, but he probably won't be part of a nucleus either. He would be a great goalie to have while we wait and see where Cossa and Augustine top out. My D choices in order are Andersson(if available,) then Chychrun, then Hanifin IF he'll re-sign. No thanks to Tanev. Edited February 21 by LeftWinger 1 mackel reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 54 minutes ago, LeftWinger said: This is why I don't see a rental coming here. Tanev just doesn't make sense at this time, but Chychrun or Hanifin does. I'm still adding Andersson in there, although I never hear his name out there as a trade target. Again, G's are different. Markstrom wouldn't be a rental with 2 years left, but he probably won't be part of a nucleus either. He would be a great goalie to have while we wait and see where Cossa and Augustine top out. My D choices in order are Andersson(if available,) then Chychrun, then Hanifin IF he'll re-sign. No thanks to Tanev. I agree with you on Tanev. SY aint giving up assets for pure rentals, unless its beyond cheap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Scott R Lucidi 481 Report post Posted February 21 1 hour ago, LeftWinger said: This is why I don't see a rental coming here. Tanev just doesn't make sense at this time, but Chychrun or Hanifin does. I'm still adding Andersson in there, although I never hear his name out there as a trade target. Again, G's are different. Markstrom wouldn't be a rental with 2 years left, but he probably won't be part of a nucleus either. He would be a great goalie to have while we wait and see where Cossa and Augustine top out. My D choices in order are Andersson(if available,) then Chychrun, then Hanifin IF he'll re-sign. No thanks to Tanev. Agreed. There is something about this year that tells me we're going to the Conference Finals anyways. I don't think we're as far away from being a competitive playoff team as everybody thinks. Our second pairing is absolutely KILLING us against the best competition in the league, but we're only 2-3 young, good rookies replacing 2-3 old, bad stop gap guys away from being a really quick team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeftWinger 4,967 Report post Posted February 21 I guess we have to ask ourselves then if we trade Berggren for a top 4 D, are we taking a bigger step forward in the NHL, or are we taking a bigger step back when it comes to prospects. Chychrun being 25 definitely becomes one of our core players, but is there enough fwd prospects to make up for the potential loss of Berggren? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 210 Report post Posted February 21 13 hours ago, Dabura said: Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios Chelios (Chelios, Chelios) Chelios Chelios Chelios Lebda Chelios Chelios (Chelios) Chelios (Chelios) 14 hours ago, Troy McClure said: I feel like you guys don't take the red wings seriously anymore and im pretty just PO'ed about it, c'mon All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy... All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy... All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy...All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy... All Work And No Play Makes Chris Chelios A Dull Boy... 1 Dabura reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 210 Report post Posted February 21 4 hours ago, LeftWinger said: Meh, I'm Luke warm on Tanev. If we were guaranteed a spot in the playoffs and Tanev was a depth signing then I'd be all over it, but it's not 2010 anymore 34 minutes ago, LeftWinger said: I guess we have to ask ourselves then if we trade Berggren for a top 4 D, are we taking a bigger step forward in the NHL, or are we taking a bigger step back when it comes to prospects. Chychrun being 25 definitely becomes one of our core players, but is there enough fwd prospects to make up for the potential loss of Berggren? Yes and yes. We're certainly better - however it's not because of our young players Holland/Yzerman drafted - it's the 'Misfit Toys' that had been signed, or traded for these past few summers. It's a rather unique rebuild, but the results are there. 1 Rick D reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The 91 of Ryans 3,015 Report post Posted February 21 Just now, Motor City Mullets said: If we were guaranteed a spot in the playoffs and Tanev was a depth signing then I'd be all over it, but it's not 2010 anymore Yes and yes. We're certainly better - however it's not because of our young players Holland/Yzerman drafted - it's the 'Misfit Toys' that had been signed, or traded for these past few summers. It's a rather unique rebuild, but the results are there. You eat those shrooms? Take Seider, Raymond, and to a lesser extend Rasmussen off this team and they are bottom 5- 8 in the league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 210 Report post Posted February 21 (edited) 1 hour ago, Scott R Lucidi said: Agreed. There is something about this year that tells me we're going to the Conference Finals anyways. I don't think we're as far away from being a competitive playoff team as everybody thinks. Our second pairing is absolutely KILLING us against the best competition in the league, but we're only 2-3 young, good rookies replacing 2-3 old, bad stop gap guys away from being a really quick team. What's rather unusual/perplexing is how we're winning games when the Wings are being outshot and/or outplayed...I'm not gonna complain about it too much because at the end of the game the Wings have won more than they lost and at this rate there's a damn good chance of finishing in a Wild Card spot. 7 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: Take Seider, Raymond, and to a lesser extend Rasmussen off this team and they are bottom 5- 8 in the league. Those same players were there last season and look where the Wings finished...This team is doing things by committee - Sprong, Compher, Kane, DeBrincat, Ghost say 'hi' ...If any one player stands out - to me it's Lyon. 7 minutes ago, The 91 of Ryans said: You eat those shrooms? Yessss! Edited February 21 by Motor City Mullets Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 The boomerz have discovered 9gag hooray for us all 1 Akakabuto reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 210 Report post Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Troy McClure said: The boomerz have discovered 9gag hooray for us all Unlike you I create most of my own memes... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Troy McClure 346 Report post Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Motor City Mullets said: Unlike you I create most of my own memes... Chatgpt AI does it for me Work harder, not smarter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Motor City Mullets 210 Report post Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, Troy McClure said: Chatgpt AI does it for me Work harder, not smarter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kipwinger 8,544 Report post Posted February 21 I'd flip a 2nd and depth prospect (Cross Hanas) for Chris Tanev. Why not? He's not going to command a 1st and the value of a 2nd (in terms of moving our rebuild forward) is pretty minimal. I think Chiarot-Tanev would be a pretty tough 2nd pair to deal with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Axl Foley 230 Report post Posted February 22 10 hours ago, LeftWinger said: I guess we have to ask ourselves then if we trade Berggren for a top 4 D, are we taking a bigger step forward in the NHL, or are we taking a bigger step back when it comes to prospects. Chychrun being 25 definitely becomes one of our core players, but is there enough fwd prospects to make up for the potential loss of Berggren? Trading Berggren still makes no sense to me. The kid has proven he can score. We have a need for scoring in the top 6 as Kane, Perron, and Fabbri wont be around forever. And we have plenty of D prospects to fill the roster for years to come. Make it make sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diehardredwingsfan58 129 Report post Posted February 22 7 hours ago, kipwinger said: I'd flip a 2nd and depth prospect (Cross Hanas) for Chris Tanev. Why not? He's not going to command a 1st and the value of a 2nd (in terms of moving our rebuild forward) is pretty minimal. I think Chiarot-Tanev would be a pretty tough 2nd pair to deal with. I was thinking the exact same thing 2024 2nd and Hanas for Chris Tanev at 3 x $3,500,000 he'd be solid 2nd pairing RHD for us until ASP is ready. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
