Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/21/2017 in Posts

  1. 8 points
  2. 4 points
    these are two of my favourite jerseys that happen to be yellow First Go Walleye! Geeky jerseys are AAmazing. I own this one lol and both are fish related
  3. 3 points
    An entire Hawks series with no "Chelsea Dagger". Wow!
  4. 3 points
  5. 3 points
    it sure does suck to miss the playoffs, but the Hawks crashing and burning so spectacularly brings a grin to my face; bye, hawks! biggest (pleasant) surprise of the first round
  6. 3 points
    Looks like that tank job didn't work too good
  7. 3 points
    We need Eichel to come here so he can clean house.
  8. 2 points
    Awesome... The Blackhawks won as many playoff games as the Wings did this year The Blackhawks become the first #1 seed to be swept by a #8 seed Preds are going deep!
  9. 2 points
    I'm just glad Martin Havlat won't be one of the voters.
  10. 1 point
    Empty netter by. Arvidsson 4-1 Preds. Bye bye Hawks!
  11. 1 point
    are you declaring shenanigans?
  12. 1 point
    Break out the brooms! That $10 million cap hit for Toews is looking pretty good right about now, eh?
  13. 1 point
  14. 1 point
    Alright, broke out of my shameless marathon just in time for OT go habs go! It makes sense.. they do have a Gallagher after all.
  15. 1 point
  16. 1 point
    oh how sweet it would be to see Chicago swept from the first round. Frankgrimes would have a fit.
  17. 1 point
    Please please please take the job! Anything to get that ****** off my TV! Is this a shot at me for starting the thread?
  18. 1 point
    Let me preface this by saying, I would never speak negatively of the Detroit Red Wings #1 starting goalie Jimmy Howard. He is a superior athlete and fantastic goal tender. I will love him and praise his name always. However, with this sweep and Elliot's season... This may be an opportunity to move Jimmy Howard...
  19. 1 point
    I'm not advocating signing a "Gagner type". We've already got a better center on our team. Helm. And I never once advocated "promoting Bertuzzi to the 3rd line". I advocated putting Frk and Svech on the 3rd line. If you're going to argue with me maybe you should actually read my previous posts. Just to reiterate. Nyq-Z-Mantha Tatar-Larkin-AA Frk-Neilsen-Svech Glen-Helm-Abby Bertuzzi Sheahan
  20. 1 point
    I would prefer to see the Wings do what Columbus did with its fourth line this season. Get rid of all the useless "grinders" on the 4th, replace them with guys who had formerly been top 9 guys, and replace THOSE guys' spots in the top 9 with young skilled players on entry level contracts. Sam Gagner and Scott Hartnell replaced guys like Jared Boll and Gregory Campbell (who were SUPER MEGA TOUGH), and all they accomplished was a combined 31 goals and 56 assists from the FOURTH LINE. You know what's really super duper hard to play against? A line that can actual control the puck and score goals instead of just hitting and blocking shots. Novel idea I know. Here's an article that helps explain the philosophy. I think it makes way more sense for improving our team. Or we could just keep doing what we did this season, with essentially the same personnel, and expect a different outcome. https://www.fanragsports.com/nhl/blue-jackets/blue-jackets-fourth-line-taking-nhl-storm/
  21. 1 point
    Nope. I'm saying whether or not we had Steve Ott made no difference at all to our winning and losing. So why sign him again? Why not try to find a solution that actually IMPROVES your team rather than one that does nothing at all? Again, this isn't theoretical. If having Ott made us better, as you're suggesting, then we would have been better when we had him. But we weren't. We were the same crappy team with or without his "hardness to play against" or whatever other stupid intangible you're suggesting he brings to the table.
  22. 1 point
    Because they're overpaid they're unlikely to be "shed". So you'd just be adding Ott's salary on top of theirs, and all of those guys are better players than he is. I can't believe I actually have to explain this. And even if you should shed one of those guys contracts, it would still be better to plug that hole with Bertuzzi since you'd ideally like him to be on the big club anyway.
  23. 1 point
    Agreed. We've already got 3 guys that forecheck well, have 4th line level offense, and are already under contract. Glendening-Helm-Abby. Why do we need someone like Ott? Oh right, because he occasionally punches people. Ugh. Nyq-Z-Mantha Tatar-Larkin-AA Frk-Neilsen-Svech Glen-Helm-Abby
  24. 1 point
    We need a better player who does that. Not Ott. Sent from my LGLS676 using Tapatalk
  25. 1 point
    Had they gotten a single point out of their final game, they would've finished above us in the standings. Instead, they blew a tie with, like, 30 seconds left in regulation, got no points from that game, and finished below us in the standings. A true jerk move.