Leaderboard

It is in our terms of service, and part of your agreement to post on this site. No politics. Period. No Trump jokes, no calling each other liberals, the only thing far right that should be discussed is the position of a winger. This is a strict policy that will be enforced after this warning. We want no part of it here, at all, anywhere. Stick to hockey and non-political discussion, this will be strictly enforced going forward. Keep it entirely off of these forums. Thank you.

Yikes, I know you start low and come to a agreement, but I think $4M is an insult to Trouba. IMO not a very good way to treat one of your best D. Just trade him to us already!

While I believe Faulk would be the best D on our team, I also believe 100% he would be testing the market in two years, unless we miraculously won a Cup within the next two years and he felt there was a great need to stay and continue the winning. If we were to acquire a player to lead our D it would have been better to target Hamilton, Hanifin or Trouba. Two of those guys are already gone (although Hanifin has not been signed yet) and I don't believe that Trouba is going to be traded. We may as well stick with our guys and promote from within over the next couple of seasons. It would be nice to get a young star like those mentioned above, I'd even be ok with over-paying for one of them, but as good as Faulk would be here, I would NOT overpay for him, and including a player like Larkin PLUS a protentional 1ST OVERALL LOTTERY pick in insane overpayment. That's even overpayment for any of the three I mentioned above. If we were including the 2019 1st, the player going back would have to be either a prospect or a player along the lines of Nyquist or Helm. Depending on the prospect, that still might be overpayment. I'm not even interested in Skinner, he too would more than likely test the market after this season and jump to a contender. Here's what I think would be acceptable (it may not be market, but I'd find it acceptable) for Faulk. At the VERY most: Svech and 2019 2nd. They may not like it, but again, I am not trading AA or a potential Jack Hughes for Faulk. If they wanted to swap Skinner out, I'd trade them Nyquist straight up, maybe throw in a conditional pick, but basically a UFA for a UFA. Again, not giving up AA or a higher prospect/pick for a potential rental.

Like you should go back to harassing goats on bridges. Your proposal is worse than his, considering it's not at all the type of package that Carolina is reportedly looking for. I think Faulk would be a good addition, and I wouldn't be worried about re-signing him, so I'd be willing to pay a bit more...even overpay a little. But if you want to mock KRS for lowballing, you need to make a better proposal than "old guy they don't want, young guy they don't want, and pick-too-far-in-the-future-to-know-if-it's-any-good". Given the return Carolina is reportedly expecting from Chicago, I don't have much hope of any good deal for a defenseman any time soon. Damn you, Chiarelli!

No the vast majority of the voters, knowingly voted for a guy that's a racist bigot which makes them promoters of racism and hate. You represent who you vote.

Swastika fan trumpsters probably account for less than .01% of his supporters. Just like, I assume/hope, antifa accounts for less than .01% of trump haters. The vast majority of the public is somewhere in the middle. Hell, I've voted democrat twice in my lifetime. You didn't vote for Trump? ******* phony. You disgrace Mike Pence's name. Last time I was on one? 3 days ago. Last time I attended a Uni class? About 5 years ago, thinking about going back again soon though. What's your point?

Yeah, not at all what I was saying. Zetterberg is the last person (player) I'd expect to be spiteful and stiff the team with the recapture penalty just because. I'm sure if he does decide to hang them up, it will be for good reason, and on a mutual understanding. It will also be via LTIR not official retirement until after the contract is up.