"We know the future is extraordinarily bright," said Bettman, who referred to the Blues as a member of the NHL's "Original 12" franchises. "The balance sheet looks much, much better, much, much stronger.
Bettman wants to tout the "Original 12" now, haha
#1
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:30 PM
#2
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:59 PM
Well...some respect has to go out to the second wave of teams like the Flyers, Blues and Sabres...but I hope this doesn't become a marketing gimmick. The Original 6 is elite and WAY older than the extra teams that make up the "Original 12."
- Drake_Marcus, Z Winged Dangler, Nev and 1 other like this
New e-book: The Spanish-American War: A Brief History. Relatively short, introductory read for casual history buffs and people who want to learn more about a forgotten war that changed America. Available at BN.com, Smashwords, Kobo, and Diesel E-Books right now. Same link as above.
#3
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:26 PM
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
#4
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:30 PM
- thegerkin, Hockeymom1960, roboturner and 1 other like this
Pavel Datsyuk - "Pasha" - #13
"Got no fun if you got no puck"
'"I like ladies" - Towards the Lady Byng trophy
"Hannnnnnnnnnk"
"Okay $5 now"
I'm Don Cherry and Danny DeKeyser is my Kadri.
#5
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:25 PM
This would be the biggest slap in the face to the O6 teams.... I can't even equate words right now....
Don't get your panties in a wad
- P. Marlowe and Dave like this
#6
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:11 PM
This feels like an appropriate quote for Gary Bettman.
Why am I a fan of the Detroit Red Wings?
The NHL tweeted my son and I at the 2012 NHL Draft!
#7
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:34 AM
Don't get your panties in a wad
"Original 12 buddies"
Fine. We can be "original 12 buddies" but I'm not wearing this charm bracelet.
- Frozen-Man, HadThomasVokounOnFortSt and Byorski like this

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#8
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:43 AM
St. Louis is one of the first 12 NHL teams, just like Vancouver and Buffalo are part of the original 14, and so on and so forth. He isn't claiming to change the historical original six to the original twelve, I think the quotation was taken very out of context if you read it again, all that's being stated here is St. Louis was one of the first 12 teams to join the NHL, which in fact they were.
Guys I know it's the offseason and we are really bored, but come on. If I can be honest, they can market whatever they want, I remember growing up and there being a lot of speculation if there would even be an NHL in the future because of the lack of fan base and it was a struggling sport for a long time. Anything he does to improve the status of the sport, bring in more fans, and keep it afloat doesn't bother me in the slightest, but I don't even think it will go as far as a marketing scheme or anything like that. I think it was just a completely misinterpreted quotation from an article.
Just because, here's a timeline of the NHL teams and when they entered the NHL.
1917- Montreal, Toronto
1924- Boston
1926- Chicago, NYR
1932- Detroit
1967 (Expansion)- Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Dallas (Minnesota and California)
1970- Vancouver, Buffalo
1972- NYI, Caroliona (Hartford),Calgary (Atlanta)
1974- Washington, New Jersey (Kansas City and Colorado)
1979- Colorado (Quebec), Edmonton, Phoenix (Winnipeg)
1991- San Jose
1992- Ottawa, Tampa Bay
1993- Anaheim, Florida
1998- Nashville
1999- Atlanta
2000- Minnesota, Columbus
- haroldsnepsts, T-Ruff, Uncle Danny and 2 others like this
#9
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:10 AM
California Seals. f*** yeah!
Edit: image resize, holy s***.
Edited by Drake_Marcus, 11 May 2012 - 01:12 AM.

Thanks TeeMan!
"We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas
of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage" --H.P. Lovecraft
#10
Posted 11 May 2012 - 01:44 AM
Just because, here's a timeline of the NHL teams and when they entered the NHL.
1917- Montreal, Toronto
1924- Boston
1926- Chicago, NYR
1932- Detroit
1967 (Expansion)- Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Los Angeles, St. Louis, Dallas (Minnesota and California)
1970- Vancouver, Buffalo
1972- NYI, Carolina (Hartford), Calgary (Atlanta)
1974- Washington, New Jersey (Kansas City and Colorado)
1979- Colorado (Quebec), Edmonton, Phoenix (Winnipeg)
1991- San Jose
1992- Ottawa, Tampa Bay
1993- Anaheim, Florida
1998- Nashville
1999- Atlanta
2000- Minnesota, Columbus
Detroit entered the league in 1926 with Chicago and NYR, and Hartford joined with the other WHA teams in 1979
- sherwood40 and Rick D like this
#11
Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:05 AM
I'm not offended, I'm actually tired of the megalomania of many O6 fans who think their team is 2nd coming of Jesus Christ and everything outside the O6 is just pretenders to produce decent hockey. if you look at playoff results from recent years - those other un-original 6 have as much if not more success. and many of newer franchises are doing more than good job, often in much worse economy.
mind you... I'd rather support Predators or Lightning with their solid job overall but limited history and fanbase, than Maple Laughs or Canadiens with their giant d* about their history and brutal product on the ice.
- Frozen-Man likes this
#12
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:52 AM
- Nev, SaCkaveli20, sherwood40 and 1 other like this
We need someone like Parise that can penetrate the box.-blueadams
#13
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:01 AM
Edited by frankgrimes, 11 May 2012 - 06:06 AM.

Thank you so much perfect human being #5
Welcome to hockeytown Jonas aka Lundquist 2 Gustavsson!
N ational
#14
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:50 AM
It's not so much that it's insulting (which it is) but that in saying it, he looks like a complete idiot who knows nothing about the history of the sport (which he is).
Now that I think of it... I guess this isn't anything we didn't already know.
Perhaps we could call them the "O6:TNG".
- Travis, Hockeymom1960 and Nev like this
My money on the board pledge:
$1 for each goal scored by a player after whom I have named a hamster.
An additional $5 for each hat trick scored by a player after whom I have named a hamster.
An additional $10 if any of the above goals is the GWG goal that gives us the series win.
An additional $50 if it is the GWG that wins us the Cup.
$5 for a SO by Jimmy.
Hamsters' names (current players in RED): Henrik Pavel Tomas Nicklas Dominik
Niklas Matthieu Daniel Robert
Johan Andreas Valtteri Jonathan
Andrew Patrick Ian Todd
And introducing: Jordin Damien Gustav James
TOTAL SO FAR: $30
#15
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:05 AM
Oh, f*** NO. Doing this disrespects Detroit, Toronto, Chicago, Boston, New York and Montreal.
How?
#16
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:23 AM
- Hockeymom1960 likes this
Money of the Board-2013 Playoff Edition: Current $31 ($5 per series win {1}, $5 per series sweep, $5 per Kronwalling {2}, $2 per Jimmy shutout or fight, $2 per Tootoo goal or fight, $2 per Mule or Brunner goal {8})
#17
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:26 AM
He needs to read a book about the history of the League. That way, he'll find out how many cities had original teams (the answer is three). Perhaps Bill Daly can read it to him.
"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".
- Harry James Benson, CBE.
#18
Posted 11 May 2012 - 08:47 AM
- 55fan, Hockeymom1960 and roboturner like this

Thanks Offsides
"If I could sum up my career in Detroit, I was a perfect goalie for the team at the perfect time. I just wanted to be a Red Wing, that's it." Chris Osgood, July 19, 2011
#19
Posted 11 May 2012 - 09:36 AM
Perhaps we could call them the "O6:TNG".
Ha! Nice!
#20
Posted 11 May 2012 - 12:08 PM
this lawyer seems different, he is making a hell of career in marketing
- Drake_Marcus likes this
Similar Topics
| Topic | Forum | Started By | Stats | Last Post Info | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any tips on ways to tolerate the NBC media? |
General Discussion | Red Wings Addict |
|
|
|
Dan McNeil on the Score 670 Now! |
General Discussion | Manny>Ozzie(by a long shot) |
|
|
|
Babcock tells players they are soft. Pushes them to play better. |
General Discussion | drumnj |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















