Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Hey Hawks fans....


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

#1 Louisville

Louisville

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,513 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 12:40 AM

They have been crying a lot about the Shaw no goal, and even Yahoo sports has decided to question it. I'd just like to say, welcome to our world!!!

 

 

 

 

Yahoo article http://ca.sports.yah...-020920646.html


Edited by Louisville, 21 May 2013 - 02:02 AM.


#2 BleedRed&White25

BleedRed&White25

    Salty Dog

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 105 posts
  • Location:Northville

Posted 21 May 2013 - 01:27 AM

I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol


Hostile to the past, impatient of the present, and cheated of the future.


#3 8 Legged RedWing

8 Legged RedWing

    Arms... Legs... Whatever.

  • Bronze Booster
  • 1,281 posts
  • Location:Farmington Hills, MI

Posted 21 May 2013 - 01:46 AM

I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol

 

I don't even want to watch it because I remember how pissed off I was lol.



#4 joesuffP

joesuffP

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,296 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 01:58 AM

Wings will get some sort of goalie interference or a goal called back on Thursday you can bank on it

#5 Louisville

Louisville

    1st Line All-Star

  • Silver Booster
  • 1,513 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 02:05 AM

I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol

 

Check out @ 5:45... I never remember Mickey getting that angry. Hands down though, the worst one is definitely around the 12:30 mark, it's disgusting.


Edited by Louisville, 21 May 2013 - 02:17 AM.


#6 crispychris

crispychris

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 281 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 04:16 AM

That's the way she goes boys.....

#7 MabusIncarnate

MabusIncarnate

    The Truth Is Out There

  • Silver Booster Mod
  • 2,233 posts
  • Location:Monteagle, Tennessee

Posted 21 May 2013 - 04:49 AM

His skate was in the crease! NO GOAL!

 

Fact is that first goal doesn't happen if that boarding on Franzen is called. The influence isn't there when the 2nd goal gets scored because the first goal didn't count. 

 

Point being, FINAL SCORE 3-1. Even if they both count, guess what, FINAL SCORE 3-2. We win either way, it wasn't like Datsyuks filthy snipe was on an empty net. A call goes in the wings favor for once, deal with it Hawks fans and stop being sore losers.


13585921555_24551f5658.jpg


#8 AtlantaHotWings

AtlantaHotWings

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 284 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 06:50 AM

Brad Watson made the call!! Wasnt it Watson who screwed us with the Hossa goal back in 09?


"Wakie, wakie hands off Snakie" - Jason Lee of Earl

#9 F.Michael

F.Michael

    Old School Dynamic Duo

  • HoF Booster
  • 7,685 posts
  • Location:Wisconsin

Posted 21 May 2013 - 07:07 AM

I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol

 

 

I don't even want to watch it because I remember how pissed off I was lol.



'Evolution' created by Offsides

#10 xtrememachine1

xtrememachine1

    1st Line All-Star

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,434 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh

Posted 21 May 2013 - 07:17 AM

I hope the Blackhawks players are as focused on the no-goal interference call as their fans.  That means they're not focused on what's really beating them.  We are swarming all over their best players with our speed, which means the role players have to step it up and at this point, they're not.  Since the Wings got that extra day of rest after Game 1, we look much quicker and Chicago is going to have to figure out a way to deal with that because we're getting another extra day of rest before Game 4.  Playing like goons and whining about calls won't cut it either.



#11 cusimano_brothers

cusimano_brothers

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,615 posts
  • Location:Niagara Falls, ON

Posted 21 May 2013 - 07:23 AM

Who do they think he is, Brett Hull?


"Mess up tomorrow, don't mess up now".

- Harry James Benson, CBE.


#12 Sprsquirt7

Sprsquirt7

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 246 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 07:54 AM

NHL Network had the proper take on it, essentially the blue crease is the goalies and you cant literally camp out there, which shaw did. he made no effort to get out of the crease when the puck wasnt there. it was a bordeline call but the missed call on the franzen hit was too. i say it was all fair in playoff hockey.

#13 Smite

Smite

    4th Line Grinder

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 210 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 08:00 AM

http://www.nhl.com/i...ge.htm?id=26480

 


 

69.3 Contact Inside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates contact with a goalkeeper, incidental or otherwise, while the goalkeeper is in his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If a goalkeeper, in the act of establishing his position within his goal crease, initiates contact with an attacking player who is in the goal crease, and this results in an impairment of the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

If, after any contact by a goalkeeper who is attempting to establish position in his goal crease, the attacking player does not immediately vacate his current position in the goal crease (i.e. give ground to the goalkeeper), and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. In all such cases, whether or not a goal is scored, the attacking player will receive a minor penalty for goalkeeper interference.

If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeeper’s vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

For this purpose, a player “establishes a significant position within the crease” when, in the Referee’s judgment, his body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the goal crease for more than an instantaneous period of time.

 

 

 

 

TSN's TH2N pointed this out, I think Quinville needs to read the rule book. Good call by the ref. 


Edited by Smite, 21 May 2013 - 08:00 AM.

"When the cast comes off, I ask my doctor, 'Have I recovered so I can play the violin?' The doctor says, 'But of course you can play the violin.' I say, 'Wow, this is great. Before this injury, I could never play violin at all. I must break the other hand so I can play guitar.'" –Pavel Datsuk on breaking his hand

#14 TigerDan

TigerDan

    Goon

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 65 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 08:38 AM

I say, let the Blackhawks fans whine.  Based on attendence, most of them have only been watching hockey for about 5 years and have nothing but biased, homer calls and announcers as the basis of their judgement.   I said it in the GDT, Homer in the crease and that goal is waved off every time.  If it was the Wings in the crease and their goal stood, Hawks fans would be screaming bloody murder.  So, you can't have it both ways.  If anything, at least it's been consistently called that way for the last 20 years. 


"This young man has had a very trying rookie season. What with the litigation, the notoriety, his subsequent deportation to Canada and that country's refusal to accept him? Whhelll, I guess that's more than most 21 year olds could handle."


#15 rrasco

rrasco

    Hall-of-Famer

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,107 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted 21 May 2013 - 08:43 AM

Well they can't admit we are outworking them, so they have to put the blame somewhere.  When in doubt, question the officiating.


Kronwalled.net - Keep Yer Head up Kid


#16 wingslogo19

wingslogo19

    Legend

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,234 posts
  • Location:Victoria BC Canada

Posted 21 May 2013 - 09:11 AM

Hawk fans need to stop whinning


IPB Image

#17 Rhah

Rhah

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 503 posts
  • Location:Champaign, IL

Posted 21 May 2013 - 09:19 AM

I'd respect them more if they brought it up as an inconsistency of the refs when it followed a goal that should have been whistled dead before by a no call penalty. But, they are only acting like the refs have only been screwing them.

 

Also, the bitching about us roughing them up seems to fall flat too considering Bickell and Shaw have been hitting our guys in the head since game 1.


  • DBR likes this

#18 RedWingsDad

RedWingsDad

    Bigot

  • Restricted
  • PipPip
  • 437 posts

Posted 21 May 2013 - 09:22 AM

I just... I just.... *head explodes*

 

Holmstrom was my favorite player... it's a crime what they did to him.


Tim Thomas - Patriot and generally awesome human being.
 
Romans 10:13 - For whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.

#19 Rhah

Rhah

    2nd Line Scorer

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 503 posts
  • Location:Champaign, IL

Posted 21 May 2013 - 09:23 AM

I just... I just.... *head explodes*

 

Holmstrom was my favorite player... it's a crime what they did to him.

 

I am curious when the rule changed allowing players to have more than 1 millimeter of their skate in the crease, Holmstrom would have dominated in this day and age of Hockey. 50 goal scorer for multiple years.



#20 SouthernWingsFan

SouthernWingsFan

    Legend

  • HoF Booster
  • 24,609 posts
  • Location:Mandeville, Louisiana (Greater New Orleans area)

Posted 21 May 2013 - 09:51 AM

Well they can't admit we are outworking them, so they have to put the blame somewhere.  When in doubt, question the officiating.

 

 

Hawk fans need to stop whinning

 

 

Yall make it sound like people in here haven't done the same.  There have been plenty crybabies about the officiating in here in the past, myself included.  You can write a novel on it if you dug deep long enough for posts in here.  Same in pretty much any fan forum.
 
Flip the teams in reverse with the interference/no-goal call, I guarantee the majority in here throws a hissy fit, understandably so.
 
The officiating was terrible for both teams last game.  Did the better team ultimately win last night?  I think so, but officials played a bigger hand than necessary in determining the outcome.  Like anybody else, I don't like when that occurs.
 
With that said, I've learned that despite that stuff there it is stupid in using the officials as a scapegoat in the result.  Fans of ANY TEAM shoud drop the officiaiting stinks card.
 
There's no point to it. Is it right that there is the potential/risk for bad officiating like this?  No.  But given that we've seen this so much over the years (i.e. Holmstrom no goals alone due to interference), why should we expect anything different anytime soon?






Similar Topics Collapse

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users