Louisville 112 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 (edited) They have been crying a lot about the Shaw no goal, and even Yahoo sports has decided to question it. I'd just like to say, welcome to our world!!! Yahoo article http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/blackhawks-robbed-refs-no-goal-game-3-vs-020920646.html Edited May 21, 2013 by Louisville 2 Z Winged Dangler and Vladifan reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BleedRed&White25 36 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol 3 wingslogo19, dropkickshanahans and Louisville reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
8 Legged RedWing 367 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol I don't even want to watch it because I remember how pissed off I was lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joesuffP 1,746 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Wings will get some sort of goalie interference or a goal called back on Thursday you can bank on it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Louisville 112 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 (edited) I got through about 5 minutes of that video and had to stop watching because I was getting too pissed off. lol Check out @ 5:45... I never remember Mickey getting that angry. Hands down though, the worst one is definitely around the 12:30 mark, it's disgusting. Edited May 21, 2013 by Louisville Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crispychris 45 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 That's the way she goes boys..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MabusIncarnate 5,359 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 His skate was in the crease! NO GOAL! Fact is that first goal doesn't happen if that boarding on Franzen is called. The influence isn't there when the 2nd goal gets scored because the first goal didn't count. Point being, FINAL SCORE 3-1. Even if they both count, guess what, FINAL SCORE 3-2. We win either way, it wasn't like Datsyuks filthy snipe was on an empty net. A call goes in the wings favor for once, deal with it Hawks fans and stop being sore losers. 4 Vladifan, Hockeymom1960, sjr2012 and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtlantaHotWings 1,124 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Brad Watson made the call!! Wasnt it Watson who screwed us with the Hossa goal back in 09? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xtrememachine1 795 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I hope the Blackhawks players are as focused on the no-goal interference call as their fans. That means they're not focused on what's really beating them. We are swarming all over their best players with our speed, which means the role players have to step it up and at this point, they're not. Since the Wings got that extra day of rest after Game 1, we look much quicker and Chicago is going to have to figure out a way to deal with that because we're getting another extra day of rest before Game 4. Playing like goons and whining about calls won't cut it either. 3 55fan, Vladifan and sjr2012 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cusimano_brothers 1,655 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Who do they think he is, Brett Hull? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sprsquirt7 45 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 NHL Network had the proper take on it, essentially the blue crease is the goalies and you cant literally camp out there, which shaw did. he made no effort to get out of the crease when the puck wasnt there. it was a bordeline call but the missed call on the franzen hit was too. i say it was all fair in playoff hockey. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smite 399 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 (edited) http://www.nhl.com/ice/page.htm?id=26480 69.3 Contact Inside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates contact with a goalkeeper, incidental or otherwise, while the goalkeeper is in his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. If a goalkeeper, in the act of establishing his position within his goal crease, initiates contact with an attacking player who is in the goal crease, and this results in an impairment of the goalkeeper’s ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. If, after any contact by a goalkeeper who is attempting to establish position in his goal crease, the attacking player does not immediately vacate his current position in the goal crease (i.e. give ground to the goalkeeper), and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. In all such cases, whether or not a goal is scored, the attacking player will receive a minor penalty for goalkeeper interference. If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeeper’s vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. For this purpose, a player “establishes a significant position within the crease” when, in the Referee’s judgment, his body, or a substantial portion thereof, is within the goal crease for more than an instantaneous period of time. TSN's TH2N pointed this out, I think Quinville needs to read the rule book. Good call by the ref. Edited May 21, 2013 by Smite 2 Vladifan and Dabura reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TigerDan 20 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I say, let the Blackhawks fans whine. Based on attendence, most of them have only been watching hockey for about 5 years and have nothing but biased, homer calls and announcers as the basis of their judgement. I said it in the GDT, Homer in the crease and that goal is waved off every time. If it was the Wings in the crease and their goal stood, Hawks fans would be screaming bloody murder. So, you can't have it both ways. If anything, at least it's been consistently called that way for the last 20 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rrasco 1,312 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Well they can't admit we are outworking them, so they have to put the blame somewhere. When in doubt, question the officiating. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslogo19 281 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Hawk fans need to stop whinning Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhah 195 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I'd respect them more if they brought it up as an inconsistency of the refs when it followed a goal that should have been whistled dead before by a no call penalty. But, they are only acting like the refs have only been screwing them. Also, the bitching about us roughing them up seems to fall flat too considering Bickell and Shaw have been hitting our guys in the head since game 1. 1 DBR reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RedWingsDad Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I just... I just.... *head explodes* Holmstrom was my favorite player... it's a crime what they did to him. 3 Hockeymom1960, Louisville and T.Low reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhah 195 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I just... I just.... *head explodes* Holmstrom was my favorite player... it's a crime what they did to him. I am curious when the rule changed allowing players to have more than 1 millimeter of their skate in the crease, Holmstrom would have dominated in this day and age of Hockey. 50 goal scorer for multiple years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernWingsFan 854 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Well they can't admit we are outworking them, so they have to put the blame somewhere. When in doubt, question the officiating. Hawk fans need to stop whinning Yall make it sound like people in here haven't done the same. There have been plenty crybabies about the officiating in here in the past, myself included. You can write a novel on it if you dug deep long enough for posts in here. Same in pretty much any fan forum. Flip the teams in reverse with the interference/no-goal call, I guarantee the majority in here throws a hissy fit, understandably so. The officiating was terrible for both teams last game. Did the better team ultimately win last night? I think so, but officials played a bigger hand than necessary in determining the outcome. Like anybody else, I don't like when that occurs. With that said, I've learned that despite that stuff there it is stupid in using the officials as a scapegoat in the result. Fans of ANY TEAM shoud drop the officiaiting stinks card. There's no point to it. Is it right that there is the potential/risk for bad officiating like this? No. But given that we've seen this so much over the years (i.e. Holmstrom no goals alone due to interference), why should we expect anything different anytime soon? 1 Valas19 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wingslogo19 281 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Yall make it sound like people in here haven't done the same. There have been plenty crybabies about the officiating in here in the past, myself included. You can write a novel on it if you dug deep long enough for posts in here. Same in pretty much any fan forum. Flip the teams in reverse with the interference/no-goal call, I guarantee the majority in here throws a hissy fit, understandably so. The officiating was terrible for both teams last game. Did the better team ultimately win last night? I think so, but officials played a bigger hand than necessary in determining the outcome. Like anybody else, I don't like when that occurs. With that said, I've learned that despite that stuff there it is stupid in using the officials as a scapegoat in the result. Fans of ANY TEAM shoud drop the officiaiting stinks card. There's no point to it. Is it right that there is the potential/risk for bad officiating like this? No. But given that we've seen this so much over the years (i.e. Holmstrom no goals alone due to interference), why should we expect anything different anytime soon? It happend to them 1 game last night. That's my point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernWingsFan 854 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 It happend to them 1 game last night. That's my point Just because it might have happened to them 1 game (and it's probably happened to them more - just like any other team) doesn't make it any more right to yank on their fans when our fan base would be throwing the same hissy fit. Whining about the refs is stupid no matter how much/little they have too much of an influence. Those are my points. 1 Resetti reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RedWingsDad Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Just because it might have happened to them 1 game (and it's probably happened to them more - just like any other team) doesn't make it any more right to yank on their fans when our fan base would be throwing the same hissy fit. Whining about the refs is stupid no matter how much/little they have too much of an influence. Those are my points. I disagree. It's fun to rip on their fans... it's also therapeutic and helps to heal our wounds inflicted by all the Holmstrom interference and no goal calls. Also... someone should tell Micky how stupid he is to "whine" about bad call's.... that idiot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SouthernWingsFan 854 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 I disagree. It's fun to rip on their fans... it's also therapeutic and helps to heal our wounds inflicted by all the Holmstrom interference and no goal calls. Also... someone should tell Micky how stupid he is to "whine" about bad call's.... that idiot. It may be fun, but it's hypocritical beyond the max for when the next time you or one of our fans whine about officiating and trying to justify about why in our case it's okay to do so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freshy 181 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 Poor Hawks "fans". They just don't understand that was a blatant in the crease no-goal. Shaw was camped out there. It's not like he had half a boot in the blue for a couple seconds. We all realize it because we have the experiance of Homer getting called for those in the past at critical times. Hawks haven't had any critical games to draw experiance from except in the last 4 years. We wouldn't even be questioning that no-goal call if it was Homer. 2 TigerDan and Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brett 1,029 Report post Posted May 21, 2013 someone should make a video of all the holmstrom goals that were waived off 2 Z Winged Dangler and Hockeymom1960 reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
