Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/30/2016 in Posts

  1. 7 points
    Just a friendly refresher as it's early in the season. Per forum guidelines... · DON'T incite flame wars by purposely baiting ("trolling") other members into an online flame war. Members caught doing so will be disciplined appropriately. Baiting, trashing the team with no intent other than to get a rise out of others after a loss, and trolling is against forum rules. I don't want to hand out warnings tonight after it's been such a pleasant start to the season. Thanks.
  2. 3 points
  3. 3 points
    Haha what? Let me help you, top right, there is this X.. click it.
  4. 3 points
    We are on a back to back, Mrazek will be in tomorrow i'm sure.
  5. 2 points
    Good morning, LGW'ers! Thanks for getting the GDT started, Mikey. Expect a much better effort tonight against a most-likely surly bunch of FL Panthers. Buffalo embarrassed them last night, so I expect they won't be happy and will try to seek revenge on us. If I know that, I bet the Wings do, too. Let's give them a trick (of the hat variety!) and not a treat, like we gave Boston last night, shall we? LGRW!!
  6. 2 points
    By no means did Boston dominate. Both teams played like hot garbage. All night it was: Turnover the puck, turnover the puck, turnover the puck... eventually that'll lead to a costly mistake ending with a puck in the back of the net. Unfortunately it was ours. Off night. I thought it might be a letdown game. Let's bounce back tonight.
  7. 2 points
    It wasn't my intention, I'm sorry I'm just frustrated
  8. 2 points
    Yzerfan87

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    Florida is the better team. Better goalie plays against the better team. That's why Jimmy is playing tonight. Because Boston is not as good as Florida. And Jimmy isn't as good as Petr. So, Petr is playing tomorrow. Against the better team.
  9. 2 points
    1 goal in 2 games is impressive. Why wear Mrazek down so early? Only Lundquist played back to back (and I think they lost one game). Pretty much every team plays the backup on one of the back to back games. We have 2 very good goalie, we should take advantage of that.
  10. 2 points
    It would help enormously if the Wings would score a goal, and not get outshot 25-15, and stop making terrible mistakes... then Jimmy letting in one goal would not seem quite so heinous. Poor guy....
  11. 2 points
    sjr2012

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    well Rask is getting a SHUTOUT right now and normally when he SHUTSOUT he will SHUTOUT ........................... SHUTOUT..... chemistry
  12. 2 points
    Is Vanek this important to our offensive success? They seem lost without him.
  13. 2 points
    kliq

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    Where's Bill? Its like the 3 faces of Foley.
  14. 1 point
    Isnt it the first time in ages we are shutout this early in a season. Usually we are one of the last team to be shutout in a season. Envoyé de mon SM-A310F en utilisant Tapatalk
  15. 1 point
    Huh? Do explain? Or is this the wrong forum your typing on? Think we miss vanek's front net presence. Hope he heals up soon.
  16. 1 point
    kickazz

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    The organization is trying to win games, not groom goalies in back to backs. Competition is tight in the league, not to mention we have two starting goaltenders on paper and salary. It would be foolish to waste one of them when he's playing well.
  17. 1 point
    *claws eyes out* Honestly, I don't think it has anything to do with Vanek. I mean, we're definitely missing him, especially on the power play. But what we're seeing tonight is a number of team-wide issues that go far beyond any one player.
  18. 1 point
    sjr2012

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    true but wings basically have a 1A 1B with jimmy mrazek
  19. 1 point
    It does seem that without Vanek our offence has disappeared. I also think Blashill's lines have something to do with that. Last game Z and AA did some good work together, but now I don't think they've been together at all tonight. (Actually has AA even played - haven't noticed him. Then Helm Nyquist were good with Vanek. Why not keep that line and put Larkin in Vanek's spot.
  20. 1 point
    One consolidation, Devils are beating the Bolts 3-0
  21. 1 point
    sjr2012

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    poor jimmy
  22. 1 point
    e_prime

    10/29 GDT: Bruins 1, at Red Wings 0

    Turnovers. Turnovers. Turnovers. Going to eventually lead to a bad goal. Was hoping that it was one of Boston's turnovers that was going to lead to the goal... Alas.
  23. 1 point
    What a horrible goal. Jimmy's been really good too.
  24. 1 point
    Recap - YAAAAWWWWNNN
  25. 1 point
    Ya, I sure hope Detroit wins its 7th in a row, unlike Michigan's 1 in a row. Detroit will be 7-2 much like Michigan State is 7-2 the last 9 against Michigan...oh the similarities!