Leaderboard

It's good to see fleury in post season form already.

No. You didn't miss anything. You simply lack the super-human ability to see the future that some other LGWs members are blessed with. With this power also comes greater hockey knowledge and an inflated value of one's own opinion.

Right now, it looks like Mrazek's style suits this Wings team better. Other team's game plans vs Detroit boils down to dumping the puck, getting on the grind, shooting from the point, and getting deflections and dirty goals. Mrazek's puck-handling and quickness in tight make that game plan hard to execute. But being THE guy, and playing all the time, is different than being the backup, obviously.

IMO there’s nothing controversial about having two good goalies. 2008 says “hi”.

They have an official SJ Sharks dinner set. It has plates and bowls but no cups, and if you use it in May or June, everything falls apart

He's got everything to be the star elite goalie I dont think we ever had ... We had hasek(who's happens to be my fav all time goalie)but he was in the end of his career Now if it was up to me if let's say mrazek goes on a tear to end the season and he backstops us till say game 7 2nd round or eastern conference finals type playoffs I'm willing to get a veteran backup goalie who can play half the games if need be and strongly consider trading howard in a blockbuster deal and getting some pieces back that will help us contend for the cup next few years with hank and pav still here I know it won't happen but I'd be more than willing to trade howard if mrazek goes nuts the rest of the way

"After last game," he said, "we had a players' only meeting and we just said, 'enough is enough. We've got to go out and play and enjoy playing.' It was like everyone was a little afraid out there." - Zetterberg http://www.freep.com/story/sports/nhl/red-wings/2015/03/15/detroit-red-wings-pittsburgh-penguins/24807125/ Looks like a players only meeting worked. Hopefully they can keep it going.

2015 is the year of Mrazek!

Hey! #pulkkamania is trending on Twitter! Get out there and make it wonderous! #Pulkkamania is Running Wild!

Other than if the Griffins go further in the playoffs, there is NO reason that Pulkkinen should EVER see Grand Rapids again! He IS going to be a Calder candidate next season, as long as the new coach utilizes with the correct line mates all the time! Same goes with Mraz. Othe than playoffs, there is no way he should ever go back down to GR. Jimmy better have eyes in the back of his head, because Mraz is here! If Jimmy isn't traded in the off season, he will ose his job eventually to Petr next season. I know it's only been a few games, but I think Zitz should get a serious look at a contract re-sign come July.

Game Stars: #1 Mraz #2 Ziddy #3 Pookie I am satisfied.

At last!!!!!!

Good solid decisive win. Thank you Mrazek.

You mean one average and one good. I meant two good goalies.

Agreed. It's nice the offense has been able to capitalize but Mrazek deserves some credit here for stopping some extremely high quality chances.

It was cute how Wisniewski thought he was too good for Detroit.

At some point people in charge might start correlating wins and Mrazek starts. I don't hate Howard but Mrazek is the best goalie we have going.

Something tells me that the Howard supporters, regardless of how the offence was or wasn't playing, wouldn't be giving Mrazek a pass if he had a 4-6 record, a .898 SV%, and a 3.XX Goals against his past 13 appearances. And yet, those are Howard's numbers since coming back.

LOL exactly the same as in a shootout.

Yeah it's never Howard's fault.

Quit blaming the line combos on Babcock's perceived insanity. Pavel ASKED for Glendening. Can we all just trust that the PROFESSIONALS usually have a really good idea what they're doing? Edit: forgot the link: http://redwings.nhl.com/club/news.htm?id=757736&navid=DL|DET|home

Cleary could sue half of Red Wings nation.

He apologized as soon as he seen it offended lupul.

I wouldn't dare make assumptions about their fidelity. However, I am curious about what they are claiming in the suit. Slander? Defamation of character? As if "being a Maple Leaf" wasn't enough to defame or injure their respective characters. Personally, I'd rather be unjustly thought and adulterer, and rightfully be thought a member of, (or worse) captain of, the Toronto Maple Leafs.