Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/24/2015 in all areas

  1. 5 points
  2. 5 points
  3. 4 points
    They had this wrapped up, then sat back and played like garbage for the last five of regulation.... They have no one to blame but themselves.
  4. 3 points
  5. 3 points
    Bring back Marchenko, sit Ericcsson. Sole reason we lost.
  6. 3 points
    Jonathan Ericsson should issue an apology to his team during this intermission. He is single-handedly responsible for us not being up 3-1.
  7. 3 points
    The dive scores 9.5, 9, 8.5, 9, and 3 from the Russian judge.
  8. 3 points
  9. 3 points
    That's what Nyquist thinks about all your bitching.
  10. 2 points
    If you said with Jonathan Ericsson on the top pair I may have agreed with you. He definitely shouldn't be there.
  11. 2 points
    I've avoided posting it, though I've thought it a thousand times, but I've never felt that it was more relevant than tonight... This team will never win a Stanley Cup with Jonathan Ericsson.
  12. 2 points
    So everyone that says that's the series, please don't watch or post because we wouldn't want you to be disappointed.
  13. 2 points
    The series is tied. Its nowhere near over boys and girls. Let's all have some faith, if it doesn't work, then we all have plenty of time to bitxh and moan.
  14. 2 points
    Man, you really want to start s***ting on him now the way he's been playing??? It'd be one thing if there weren't mistakes in front of, but there were. And he's been outstanding the last couple of games. He isn't the one dropping the ball right now, it's the ******* defense, in particular that s***ty ass pylon wearing number 52.
  15. 2 points
    Either they chorked away a giant advantage in this series or they didn't... Brendan Smith jumps in and wins it.
  16. 2 points
    keith jones just lit ericsson up in the studio
  17. 2 points
  18. 2 points
  19. 2 points
  20. 2 points
    It means you've been taking regular showers.
  21. 2 points
    Statistics are exactly what they are, they provide a compelling argument, and if you don't like it you should come up with a better explanation, what you've done is make an ad hominem attack. Doesn't make you look real good. Now, I'd like to see the stats they are using . I will bet that the statistics can prove some of the intangibles. Like looking at the success of shifts after winning fights, etc. I bet there is proof to some of the "momentum."
  22. 2 points
    Put one straight up BoS's bunghole!
  23. 2 points
  24. 2 points
    That right there is what they call puck luck. That was awesome.
  25. 2 points
    Also not mine, but fits the theme...